Tissue regeneration in vivo within recombinant spidroin 1 scaffolds

Biomaterials

Volumn 33, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 3887-3898

  Moisenovich, Mikhail M ^a   Pustovalova, Olga ^a   Shackelford, Julia ^b   Vasiljeva, Tamara V ^a   Druzhinina, Tatiana V ^a   Kamenchuk, Yana A ^a   Guzeev, Vitaly V ^a   Sokolova, Olga S ^a   Bogush, Vladimir G ^c   Debabov, Vladimir G ^c   Kirpichnikov, Mikhail P ^a   Agapov, Igor I ^d  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c STATE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND SELECTION OF INDUSTRIAL MICROORGANISMS   (Russian Federation)

^d SHUMAKOV NATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER OF TRANSPLANTOLOGY AND ARTIFICIAL ORGANS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Fibroin; In vivo regeneration; Recombinant spidroin; Silk based polymer scaffolds; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

BALB/C MICE; BOMBYX MORI; BONE DEFECT; CONNECTIVE TISSUES; DEGRADATION BEHAVIOR; FIBROIN; GIANT CELLS; IN VIVO REGENERATION; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; INNER STRUCTURE; INTERGROWTH; INTERNAL MICROSTRUCTURE; MICROPORES; NEPHILA CLAVIPES; NERVE FIBERS; POLYMER SCAFFOLDS; POROUS SCAFFOLD; RECOMBINANT SPIDROIN; SILK PROTEINS; SILK-BASED POLYMER SCAFFOLDS; TISSUE GRAFTS; TISSUE REGENERATION; VASCULARIZATION; WISTAR RAT;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; COLLAGEN; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SILK; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

POROUS POLYMER; RECOMBINANT SPIDROIN 1; SILK FIBROIN; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE DEFECT; BONE REMODELING; CELL GROWTH; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GIANT CELL; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MACROPHAGE; MICROENVIRONMENT; MONONUCLEAR CELL; MOUSE; NEPHILA CLAVIPES; NERVE FIBER; NONHUMAN; OSTEOCLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; RAT; SILKWORM; TISSUE REGENERATION; VASCULARIZATION;

3T3 CELLS; ANIMALS; BOMBYX; BONE AND BONES; BONE REGENERATION; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; FEMALE; FIBROINS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; OSTEOGENESIS; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; POLYMERS; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RATS; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

COLLAGEN; POLYMERS; PROTEINS; SCAFFOLDS; SILK; TISSUE;

BOMBYX MORI; MUS; NEPHILA CLAVIPES; RATTUS NORVEGICUS;

EID: 84858293708     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Hardy J.G., Scheibel T.R. Silk-inspired polymers and proteins. Biochem Soc Trans 2009, 37:677-681.
2. Altman G.H., Diaz F., Jakuba C., Calabro T., Horan R.L., Chen J., et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 2003, 24:401-416.
3. Sehnal F., Sutherland T. Silks produced by insect labial glands. Prion 2008, 2:145-153.
4. Kluge J.A., Rabotyagova O., Leisk G.G., Kaplan D.L. Spider silks and their applications. Trends Biotechnol 2008, 26:244-251.
5. Mandal B.B., Mann J.K., Kundu S.C. Silk fibroin/gelatin multilayered films as a model system for controlled drug release. Eur J Pharm Sci 2009, 37:160-171.
6. Bhumiratana S., Grayson W.L., Castaneda A., Rockwood D.N., Gil E.S., Kaplan D.L., et al. Nucleation and growth of mineralized bone matrix on silk-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2812-2820.
7. Heim M., Keerl D., Scheibel T. Spider silk: from soluble protein to extraordinary fiber. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2009, 48:3584-3596.
8. Peltola S.M., Melchels F.P., Grijpma D.W., Kellomaki M. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Ann Med 2008, 40:268-280.
9. Huttunen M., Tormala P., Godinho P., Kellomaki M. Fiber-reinforced bioactive and bioabsorbable hybrid composites. Biomed Mater 2008, 3:034106.
10. Subramanian A., Krishnan U.M., Sethuraman S. Development of biomaterial scaffold for nerve tissue engineering: Biomaterial mediated neural regeneration. J Biomed Sci 2009, 16:108.
11. Ge Z., Jin Z., Cao T. Manufacture of degradable polymeric scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomed Mater 2008, 3:022001.
12. Kuo C.K., Li W.J., Mauck R.L., Tuan R.S. Cartilage tissue engineering: its potential and uses. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006, 18:64-73.
13. Mandal B.B., Kundu S.C. Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2956-2965.
14. Gao J., Crapo P.M., Wang Y. Macroporous elastomeric scaffolds with extensive micropores for soft tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2006, 12:917-925.
15. Guehrs K.H., Schlott B., Grosse F., Weisshart K. Environmental conditions impinge on dragline silk protein composition. Insect Mol Biol 2008, 17:553-564.
16. Grip S., Johansson J., Hedhammar M. Engineered disulfides improve mechanical properties of recombinant spider silk. Protein Sci 2009, 18:1012-1022.
17. Bogush V.G., Sokolova O.S., Davydova L.I., Klinov D.V., Sidoruk K.V., Esipova N.G., et al. A novel model system for design of biomaterials based on recombinant analogs of spider silk proteins. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2009, 4:17-27.
18. Agapov, Pustovalova O.L., Moisenovich M.M., Bogush V.G., Sokolova O.S., Sevastyanov V.I., et al. Three-dimensional scaffold made from recombinant spider silk protein for tissue engineering. Dokl Biochem Biophys 2009, 426:127-130.
19. Vezy C., Hermanson K.D., Scheibel T., Bausch A.R. Interfacial rheological properties of recombinant spider-silk proteins. Biointerphases 2009, 4:43-46.
20. Moisenovich M.M., Pustovalova O.L., Arhipova A.Y., Vasiljeva T.V., Sokolova O.S., Bogush V.G., et al. In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility studies of a recombinant analogue of spidroin 1 scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011, 96:125-131.
21. Sokolov O.S., Bogush V.G., Davydova L.I., Polevova S.V., Antonov S.A., Neretina T.V., et al. The formation of a quaternary structure by recombinant analogs of spider silk proteins. Mol Biol (Mosk) 2010, 44(1):162-169.
22. Agapov, Moisenovich M.M., Vasilyeva T.V., Pustovalova O.L., Kon'kov A.S., Arkhipova A.Y., et al. Biodegradable matrices from regenerated silk of Bombix mori. Dokl Biochem Biophys 2010, 433:201-204.
23. Gellynck K., Verdonk P., Forsyth R., Almqvist K.F., Van Nimmen E., Gheysens T., et al. Biocompatibility and biodegradability of spider egg sac silk. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008, 19:2963-2970.
24. Camilla Fredriksson M.H., Feinstein Ricardo, Nordling Kerstin, Gunnar Kratz J.J., Huss Fredrik, Rising Anna Tissue response to subcutaneously implanted recombinant spider silk: an in vivo study. Materials 2009, 2:1908-1922.
25. Baoyong L., Jian Z., Denglong C., Min L. Evaluation of a new type of wound dressing made from recombinant spider silk protein using rat models. Burns 2010, 36:891-896.
26. Sangwaiya M.J., Kalra M.K., Sharma A., Halpern E.F., Shepard J.A., Digumarthy S.R. Dual-energy computed tomographic pulmonary angiography: a pilot study to assess the effect on image quality and diagnostic confidence. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010, 34:46-51.
27. Sobajo C., Behzad F., Yuan X.F., Bayat A. Silk: a potential medium for tissue engineering. Eplasty 2008, 8:e47.
28. Zhou C.Z., Confalonieri F., Jacquet M., Perasso R., Li Z.G., Janin J. Silk fibroin: structural implications of a remarkable amino acid sequence. Proteins 2001, 44:119-122.
29. Guhrs K.H., Weisshart K., Grosse F. Lessons from nature-protein fibers. J Biotechnol 2000, 74:121-134.
30. Stark M., Grip S., Rising A., Hedhammar M., Engstrom W., Hjalm G., et al. Macroscopic fibers self-assembled from recombinant miniature spider silk proteins. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:1695-1701.
31. Lazaris A., Arcidiacono S., Huang Y., Zhou J.F., Duguay F., Chretien N., et al. Spider silk fibers spun from soluble recombinant silk produced in mammalian cells. Science 2002, 295:472-476.
32. Jin H.J., Kaplan D.L. Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature 2003, 424:1057-1061.
33. Winkler S., Wilson D., Kaplan D.L. Controlling beta-sheet assembly in genetically engineered silk by enzymatic phosphorylation/dephosphorylation. Biochemistry 2000, 39:14002.
34. Zhang P., Yamamoto K., Aso Y., Banno Y., Sakano D., Wang Y., et al. Proteomic studies of isoforms of the P25 component of Bombyx mori fibroin. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2005, 69:2086-2093.
35. Meinel L., Hofmann S., Karageorgiou V., Kirker-Head C., McCool J., Gronowicz G., et al. The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2005, 26:147-155.
36. Wang Y., Rudym D.D., Walsh A., Abrahamsen L., Kim H.J., Kim H.S., et al. In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. Biomaterials 2008, 29:3415-3428.
37. Hedhammar M., Rising A., Grip S., Martinez A.S., Nordling K., Casals C., et al. Structural properties of recombinant nonrepetitive and repetitive parts of major ampullate spidroin 1 from Euprosthenops australis: implications for fiber formation. Biochemistry 2008, 47:3407-3417.
38. Rising A., Johansson J., Larson G., Bongcam-Rudloff E., Engstrom W., Hjalm G. Major ampullate spidroins from Euprosthenops australis: multiplicity at protein, mRNA and gene levels. Insect Mol Biol 2007, 16:551-561.
39. Padera R.F., Colton C.K. Time course of membrane microarchitecture-driven neovascularization. Biomaterials 1996, 17:277-284.
40. Campbell C.E., von Recum A.F. Microtopography and soft tissue response. J Invest Surg 1989, 2:51-74.
41. Brauker J.H., Carr-Brendel V.E., Martinson L.A., Crudele J., Johnston W.D., Johnson R.C. Neovascularization of synthetic membranes directed by membrane microarchitecture. J Biomed Mater Res 1995, 29:1517-1524.
42. Miyauchi A., Kanje M., Danielsen N., Dahlin L.B. Role of macrophages in the stimulation and regeneration of sensory nerves by transposed granulation tissue and temporal aspects of the response. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1997, 31:17-23.
43. Anderson J.M. Multinucleated giant cells. Curr Opin Hematol 2000, 7:40-47.
44. Sengupta S., Park S.H., Seok G.E., Patel A., Numata K., Lu C.L., et al. Quantifying osteogenic cell degradation of silk biomaterials. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:3592-3599.
45. Loesberg W.A., Walboomers X.F., van Loon J.J., Jansen J.A. The effect of combined hypergravity and micro-grooved surface topography on the behaviour of fibroblasts. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2006, 63:384-394.
46. Bogush V.G., Sazykin A.Y., Davydova L.I., Martirosyan V.V., Sidoruk K.V., Glazunov A.V., et al. Obtaining, purification and silking of recombinant analog of spidroin 1. Biotekhnologia 2006, 4:3-12.
47. Cheng Q., Peng T.Z., Hu X.B., Yang C.F. Charge-selective recognition at fibroin-modified electrodes for analytical application. Anal Bioanal Chem 2005, 382:80-84.
48. Sugimoto Y., Hagiwara A. Cell locomotion on differently charged substrates. Effects of substrate charge on locomotive speed of fibroblastic cells. Exp Cell Res 1979, 120:245-252.
49. Peyton S.R., Ghajar C.M., Khatiwala C.B., Putnam A.J. The emergence of ECM mechanics and cytoskeletal tension as important regulators of cell function. Cell Biochem Biophys 2007, 47:300-320.
50. Salvi J.D., Lim J.Y., Donahue H.J. Increased mechanosensitivity of cells cultured on nanotopographies. J Biomech 2010, 43:3058-3062.