In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility studies of a recombinant analogue of spidroin 1 scaffolds

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 96 A, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 125-131

  Moisenovich, M M ^a   Pustovalova, O L ^a   Yu Arhipova, A ^a   Vasiljeva, T V ^a   Sokolova, O S ^a   Bogush, V G ^b   Debabov, V G ^b   Sevastianov, V I ^c   Kirpichnikov, M P ^a   Agapov, I I ^c  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b STATE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND SELECTION OF INDUSTRIAL MICROORGANISMS   (Russian Federation)

^c SHUMAKOV NATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER OF TRANSPLANTOLOGY AND ARTIFICIAL ORGANS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

biocompatibility; biodegradable scaffold; biopolymer; spidroin

Indexed keywords

BALB/C MICE; BIODEGRADABLE SCAFFOLD; CONNECTIVE TISSUES; GENETICALLY ENGINEERED PROTEIN; GLASS SURFACES; IN-VITRO; MACROPOROUS STRUCTURES; MICROPORES; NEPHILA CLAVIPES; NERVE FIBERS; OXIDIZING ENVIRONMENTS; PHOSPHATE BUFFERS; POROUS SCAFFOLD; SALT LEACHING; SPIDROIN;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMOLECULES; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; LEACHING; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SCAFFOLDS;

PHOSPHATE BUFFERED SALINE; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; RS1/9; SCAFFOLD PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; LEACHING; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELLS, CULTURED; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; FIBROINS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; POROSITY; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 78649588811     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32968     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bacakova L, Filova E, Rypacek F, Svorcik V, Stary V,. Cell adhesion on artificial materials for tissue engineering. Physiol Res 2004; 53 (Suppl 1): S35-S45.
2. Lee J, Cuddihy MJ, Kotov NA,. Three-dimensional cell culture matrices: State of the art. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2008; 14: 61-86.
3. Sevastianov VI, Vasilets VN, Agapov II,. Biopolymer implants for high-technology assistance in the field of replacement and regenerative medicine. Rare Metals 2009; 28: 84-86.
4. Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, Calabro T, Horan RL, Chen J, Lu H, Richmond J, Kaplan DL,. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 401-416.
5. Acharya C, Ghosh SK, Kundu SC,. Silk fibroin protein from mulberry and non-mulberry silkworms: Cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and kinetics of L929 murine fibroblast adhesion. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 2827-2836.
6. Asakura T, Tanaka C, Yang M, Yao J, Kurokawa M,. Production and characterization of a silk-like hybrid protein, based on the polyalanine region of Samia cynthia ricini silk fibroin and a cell adhesive region derived from fibronectin. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 617-624.
7. Gosline JM, Guerette PA, Ortlepp CS, Savage KN,. The mechanical design of spider silks: From fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J Exp Biol 1999; 202: 3295-3303.
8. Li M, Tao W, Lu S, Zhao C,. Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated Antheraea pernyi silk fibroin. Polym Adv Technol 2008; 19: 207-212.
9. Campbell CE, von Recum AF,. Microtopography and soft tissue response. J Invest Surg 1989; 2: 51-74.
10. Arcidiacono S, Mello C, Kaplan D, Cheley S, Bayley H,. Purification and characterization of recombinant spider silk expressed in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1998; 49: 31-38.
11. Scheller J, Guhrs KH, Grosse F, Conrad U,. Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19: 573-577.
12. Bogush VG, Sazykin AY, Davydova LI, Martirosyan VV, Sidoruk KV, Glazunov AV, Akishina RI, Shmatchenko NA, Debabov VG,. Obtaining, purification and silking of recombinant analog of spidroin 1. Biotechnology (Mosc) 2006; 4: 1-15.
13. Bogush VG, Sokolova OS, Davydova LI, Klinov DV, Sidoruk KV, Esipova NG, Neretina TV, Orchanskyi IA, Makeev VY, Tumanyan VG, Shaitan KV, Debabov VG, Kirpichnikov MP,. A novel model system for design of biomaterials based on recombinant analogs of spider silk proteins. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2009; 4: 17-27.
14. Fahnestock SR, Yao Z, Bedzyk LA,. Microbial production of spider silk proteins. J Biotechnol 2000; 74: 105-119.
15. Kluge JA, Rabotyagova O, Leisk GG, Kaplan DL,. Spider silks and their applications. Trends Biotechnol 2008; 26: 244-251.
16. Teule F, Cooper AR, Furin WA, Bittencourt D, Rech EL, Brooks A, Lewis RV,. A protocol for the production of recombinant spider silk-like proteins for artificial fiber spinning. Nat Protoc 2009; 4: 341-355.
17. Huang J, Wong C, George A, Kaplan DL,. The effect of genetically engineered spider silk-dentin matrix protein 1 chimeric protein on hydroxyapatite nucleation. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2358-2367.
18. Wong Po FC, Patwardhan SV, Belton DJ, Kitchel B, Anastasiades D, Huang J, Naik RR, Perry CC, Kaplan DL,. Novel nanocomposites from spider silk-silica fusion (chimeric) proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 9428-9433.
19. Stark M, Grip S, Rising A, Hedhammar M, Engstrom W, Hjalm G, Johansson J,. Macroscopic fibers self-assembled from recombinant miniature spider silk proteins. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8: 1695-1701.
20. Lazaris A, Arcidiacono S, Huang Y, Zhou JF, Duguay F, Chretien N, Welsh EA, Soares JW, Karatzas CN,. Spider silk fibers spun from soluble recombinant silk produced in mammalian cells. Science 2002; 295: 472-476.
21. Chen X, Shao Z, Marinkovic NS, Miller LM, Zhou P, Chance MR,. Conformation transition kinetics of regenerated Bombyx mori silk fibroin membrane monitored by time-resolved FTIR spectroscopy. Biophys Chem 2001; 89: 25-34.
22. Fahnestock SR,. Novel, recombinantly produced spider silk analogs. Int. Application #PCT/US94/06689. Int. Publication #WO 94/29450. 1994.
23. Seidel A, Liivak O, Calve S, Adaska J, Ji G, Yang Z, Grubb D, Zax DB, Jelinski LW,. Regenerated spider silk: Processing, properties, and structure. Macromolecules 2009; 33: 775-780.
24. Winyard PG, Perret D, Harris G, Blake DR,. The role of toxic oxygen species in inflammation with special reference to DNA damage. In:, Whitcher J, Evans S, editors. Biochemistry of Inflammation. Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2009. p 112.
25. Gellynck K, Verdonk P, Forsyth R, Almqvist KF, Van NE, Gheysens T, Mertens J, Van LL, Kiekens P, Verbruggen G,. Biocompatibility and biodegradability of spider egg sac silk. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 2963-2970.
26. MacIntosh AC, Kearns VR, Crawford A, Hatton PV,. Skeletal tissue engineering using silk biomaterials. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2008; 2: 71-80.
27. Hakimi O, Gheysens T, Vollrath F, Grahn MF, Knight DP, Vadgama P,. Modulation of cell growth on exposure to silkworm and spider silk fibers. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 92: 1366-1372.
28. Bini E, Foo CW, Huang J, Karageorgiou V, Kitchel B, Kaplan DL,. RGD-functionalized bioengineered spider dragline silk biomaterial. Biomacromolecules 2006; 7: 3139-3145.
29. Morgan AW, Roskov KE, Lin-Gibson S, Kaplan DL, Becker ML, Simon CG Jr,. Characterization and optimization of RGD-containing silk blends to support osteoblastic differentiation. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 2556-2563.
30. Scheller J, Henggeler D, Viviani A, Conrad U,. Purification of spider silk-elastin from transgenic plants and application for human chondrocyte proliferation. Transgen Res 2004; 13: 51-57.
31. Cai Q, Yang J, Bei J, Wang S,. A novel porous cells scaffold made of polylactide-dextran blend by combining phase-separation and particle-leaching techniques. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 4483-4492.
32. Lampin M, Warocquier C, Legris C, Degrange M, Sigot-Luizard MF,. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 36: 99-108.
33. Mata A, Su X, Fleischman AJ, Roy S, Banks BA, Miller SK, Midura RJ,. Osteoblast attachment to a textured surface in the absence of exogenous adhesion proteins. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 2003; 2: 287-294.
34. Singhvi R, Stephanopoulos G, Wang DI,. Effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994; 43: 764-771.
35. Von Recum AF, Shannon CE, Cannon CE, Long KJ, Van Kooten TG, Meyle J,. Surface roughness, porosity, and texture as modifiers of cellular adhesion. Tissue Eng 1996; 2: 241-253.
36. Gao J, Crapo PM, Wang Y,. Macroporous elastomeric scaffolds with extensive micropores for soft tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2006; 12: 917-925.
37. Ilagan BG, Amsden BG,. Macroporous photocrosslinked elastomer scaffolds containing microporosity: Preparation and in vitro degradation properties. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 93: 211-218.
38. Lee JH, Lee SJ, Khang G, Lee HB,. Interaction of fibroblasts on polycarbonate membrane surfaces with different micropore sizes and hydrophilicity. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1999; 10: 283-294.
39. Fredriksson C, Hedhammar M, Feinstein R, Nordling K, Kratz G, Johansson J, Huss F, Rising A,. Tissue response to subcutaneously implanted recombinant spider silk: An in vivo study. Materials 2009; 2: 1908-1922.
40. Allmeling C, Jokuszies A, Reimers K, Kall S, Choi CY, Brandes G, Kasper C, Scheper T, Guggenheim M, Vogt PM,. Spider silk fibres in artificial nerve constructs promote peripheral nerve regeneration. Cell Prolif 2008; 41: 408-420.
41. Meinel L, Hofmann S, Karageorgiou V, Kirker-Head C, McCool J, Gronowicz G, Zichner L, Langer R, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL,. The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 147-155.
42. Wang Y, Rudym DD, Walsh A, Abrahamsen L, Kim HJ, Kim HS, Kirker-Head C, Kaplan DL,. In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 3415-3428.
43. Padera RF, Colton CK,. Time course of membrane microarchitecture-driven neovascularization. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 277-284.
44. Brauker JH, Carr-Brendel VE, Martinson LA, Crudele J, Johnston WD, Johnson RC,. Neovascularization of synthetic membranes directed by membrane microarchitecture. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 1517-1524.
45. Miyauchi A, Kanje M, Danielsen N, Dahlin LB,. Role of macrophages in the stimulation and regeneration of sensory nerves by transposed granulation tissue and temporal aspects of the response. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1997; 31: 17-23.
46. Gibran NS, Tamura R, Tsou R, Isik FF,. Human dermal microvascular endothelial cells produce nerve growth factor: Implications for wound repair. Shock 2003; 19: 127-130.