Optimization of biosurfactant-mediated oil extraction from oil sludge

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 110, Issue , 2012, Pages 338-342

  Zheng, Chenggang ^a   Wang, Manman ^b,c   Wang, Yongli ^d   Huang, Zhiyong ^c  

^a SINOPEC   (China)

^b TIANJIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

^d INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Biosurfactant formula; Oil recovery; Oil sludge; Taguchi method

Indexed keywords

BIO SURFACTANT; DESIGN-EXPERT; EMULSAN; EXPERIMENT DESIGN; FIRST ORDER KINETICS; LICHENYSIN; N-BUTANOL; OIL EXTRACTION; OIL RECOVERIES; OIL SLUDGE; ORTHOGONAL ARRAY DESIGNS; RHAMNOLIPIDS; SURFACTIN; TAGUCHI; WASHING RATE;

DESIGN; EXPERIMENTS; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; OPTIMIZATION; RATE CONSTANTS; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; TAGUCHI METHODS; WASHING;

BIOMOLECULES;

BIOSURFACTANT; BUTANOL; EMULSAN; HYDROCARBON; LICHENYSIN; OIL; RHAMNOLIPID; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SOLVENT; SURFACTIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALCOHOL; ARRAY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); OPTIMIZATION; PH; REACTION KINETICS; SALINITY; SURFACTANT;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); EXTRACTION; KINETICS; NONHUMAN; OIL EXTRACTION; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALINITY; SLUDGE; SLUDGE TREATMENT; TEMPERATURE;

OILS; PETROLEUM; SEWAGE; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 84858289981     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.073     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abdul A.S., Gibson T.L., Rai D.N. Selection of surfactants for the removal of petroleum-products from shallow sandy aquifers. Ground Water 1990, 28(6):920-926.
2. Abouseoud M., Yataghene A., Amrane A., Maachi R. Effect of pH and salinity on the emulsifying capacity and naphthalene solubility of a biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 180(1-3):131-136.
3. Bai G.Y., Brusseau M.L., Miller R.M. Biosurfactant-enhanced removal of residual hydrocarbon from soil. J. Contam. Hydrol. 1997, 25(1-2):157-170.
4. Chen S.Y., Lu W.B., Wei Y.H., Chen W.M., Chang J.S. Improved production of biosurfactant with newly isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa S2. Biotechnol. Prog. 2007, 23(3):661-666.
5. Cilek E.C. Estimation of flotation kinetic parameters by considering interactions of the operating variables. Minerals Eng. 2004, 17(1):81-85.
6. Cooper D.G., Macdonald C.R., Duff S.J., Kosaric N. Enhanced production of surfactin from Bacillus subtilis by continuous product removal and metal cation additions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1981, 42(3):408-412.
7. Cuypers C., Pancras T., Grotenhuis T., Rulkens W. The estimation of PAH bioavailability in contaminated sediments using hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and Triton X-100 extraction techniques. Chemosphere 2002, 46(8):1235-1245.
8. Deshpande S., Shiau B.J., Wade D., Sabatini D.A., Harwell J.H. Surfactant selection for enhancing ex situ soil washing. Water Res. 1999, 33(2):351-360.
9. Dibble J.T., Bartha R. Effect of environmental parameters on the biodegradation of oil sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979, 37(4):729-739.
10. Lai C.C., Huang Y.C., Wei Y.H., Chang J.S. Biosurfactant-enhanced removal of total petroleum hydrocarbons from contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167(1-3):609-614.
11. Lin S.C., Minton M.A., Sharma M.M., Georgiou G. Structural and immunological characterization of a biosurfactant produced by Bacillus licheniformis JF-2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60(1):31-38.
12. Matsushita Y., Imai M., Iwatsuki A., Fukushima K. The relationship between surface tension and the industrial performance of water-soluble polymers prepared from acid hydrolysis lignin, a saccharification by-product from woody materials. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(8):3024-3028.
13. Muller M.M., Hormann B., Syldatk C., Hausmann R. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 as a model for rhamnolipid production in bioreactor systems. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87(1):167-174.
14. Mutalik S.R., Vaidya B.K., Joshi R.M., Desai K.M., Nene S.N. Use of response surface optimization for the production of biosurfactant from Rhodococcus spp. MTCC 2574. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(16):7875-7880.
15. Ochoa-Loza F.J., Artiola J.F., Maier R.M. Stability constants for the complexation of various metals with a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. J. Environ. Qual. 2001, 30(2):479-485.
16. Okieimen C.O., Okieimen F.E. Effect of natural rubber processing sludge on the degradation of crude oil hydrocarbons in soil. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 82(1):95-97.
17. Polat M., Chander S. First-order flotation kinetics models and methods for estimation of the true distribution of notation rate constants. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2000, 58(1-4):145-166.
18. Ramaswamy B., Kar D.D., De S. A study on recovery of oil from sludge containing oil using froth flotation. J. Environ. Manage. 2007, 85(1):150-154.
19. Ron E.Z., Rosenberg E. Biosurfactants and oil bioremediation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002, 13(3):249-252.
20. Saeki H., Sasaki M., Komatsu K., Miura A., Matsuda H. Oil spill remediation by using the remediation agent JE1058BS that contains a biosurfactant produced by Gordonia sp. strain JE-1058. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(2):572-577.
21. Shin K.H., Kim K.W., Seagren E.A. Combined effects of pH and biosurfactant addition on solubilization and biodegradation of phenanthrene. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 65(3):336-343.
22. Su W.T., Chen W.J., Lin Y.F. Optimizing emulsan production of A. venetianus RAG-1 using response surface methodology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84(2):271-279.
23. Urum K., Grigson S., Pekdemir T., McMenamy S. A comparison of the efficiency of different surfactants for removal of crude oil from contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2006, 62(9):1403-1410.
24. Urum K., Pekdemir T. Evaluation of biosurfactants for crude oil contaminated soil washing. Chemosphere 2004, 57(9):1139-1150.
25. Urum, K., Pekdemir, T., Gopur, M. 2003. Optimum conditions for washing of crude oil-contaminated soil with biosurfactant solutions. Process Safety Environ. Prot. 81(B3), 203-209.
26. Venkata Mohan S., Purushotham Reddy B., Sarma P.N. Ex situ slurry phase bioremediation of chrysene contaminated soil with the function of metabolic function: process evaluation by data enveloping analysis (DEA) and Taguchi design of experimental methodology (DOE). Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(1):164-172.
27. Wang Q., Fang X., Bai B., Liang X., Shuler P.J., Goddard W.A., Tang Y. Engineering bacteria for production of rhamnolipid as an agent for enhanced oil recovery. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 98(4):842-853.
28. Wei Q.F., Mather R.R., Fotheringham A.F. Oil removal from used sorbents using a biosurfactant. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96(3):331-334.
29. Whang L.M., Liu P.W.G., Ma C.C., Cheng S.S. Application of biosurfactants, rhamnolipid, and surfactin, for enhanced biodegradation of diesel-contaminated water and soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151(1):155-163.
30. Xie Y.W., Ye R.Q., Liu H.L. Microstructure studies on biosurfactant-rhamnolipid/n-butanol/water/n-heptane microemulsion system. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2007, 292(2-3):189-195.