Osteoinductive hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants

Biomaterials

Volumn 33, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 3813-3823

  Ripamonti, Ugo ^a   Roden, Laura C ^a,b   Renton, Louise F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Biomimetic matrices; Inductive nanotopography; Modified titanium surfaces; Myoblastic stem cells; Plasma sprayed hydroxyapatites; Primates

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINIS; BIOMIMETIC MATRICES; BONE DIFFERENTIATION; BONE FORMATION; CRYSTALLINE HYDROXYAPATITE; GRINDING SYSTEM; HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS; LONGITUDINAL SECTION; MACROPOROUS; MICROENVIRONMENTS; MINERALIZED BONE; MOLECULAR SIGNALS; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; NON-HUMAN PRIMATE; OSTEOGENIC; PLASMA SPRAYED; PRECISION CUTTING; PRIMATES; SUPERGENE; TI6A14V; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; TITANIUM SURFACES; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTORS; UNIFORM LAYER;

BONE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; GEOMETRY; HYDROXYAPATITE; MAMMALS; MUSCLE; PLASMA JETS; PLASMA SPRAYING; SPECIMEN PREPARATION; STEM CELLS;

TITANIUM;

HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE MINERALIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDENTULOUSNESS; GRINDING; IMPLANT; MATERIAL COATING; MOLAR TOOTH; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE; SURFACE PROPERTY; THICKNESS; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

ANIMALS; BIOREACTORS; CELL POLARITY; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DURAPATITE; HUMANS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MUSCLES; NIH 3T3 CELLS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOGENESIS; PAPIO URSINUS; TITANIUM;

ANIMALIA; PRIMATES;

EID: 84858288939     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.050     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Discher D.E., Janmey P., Wang Y.L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310:1139-1143.
2. Ripamonti U., van Den Heever B., van Wyk J. Expression of the osteogenic phenotype in porous hydroxyapatite implanted extraskeletally in baboons. Matrix 1993, 13:491-502.
3. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007, 6:997-1003.
4. Discher D.E., Mooney D.J., Zandstra P.W. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 2009, 324:1673-1677.
5. Buxboim A., Discher D.E. Stem cells feel the difference. Nat Methods 2010, 7:695-697.
6. Buxboim A., Ivanovska I.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells 'feel' outside and in?. J Cell Sci 2010, 123:297-308.
7. Fu J., Wang Y.K., Yang M.T., Desai R.A., Yu X., Liu Z., et al. Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nat Methods 2010, 7:733-736.
8. Brunette D.M. The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988, 3:231-246.
9. Chou L., Firth J.D., Uitto V.-J., Brunette D.M. Substratum surface topography alters cell shape and regulates fibronectin mRNA level, mRNA stability, secretion and assembly in human fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 1995, 108:1563-1573.
10. Wieland M., Textor M., Spencer N.D., Brunette D.M. Wavelength-dependent roughness: a quantitative approach to characterizing the topography of rough titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001, 16:163-181.
11. Sammons R.L., Lumbikanonda N., Gross M., Cantzler P. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005, 16:657-666.
12. Curran J.M., Chen R., Hunt J.A. The guidance of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in vitro by controlled modifications to the cell substrate. Biomaterials 2006, 27:4783-4793.
13. Mcnamara L.E., Mcmurray R.J., Biggs M.J., Kantawong F., Oreffo R.O., Dalby M.J. Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation. J Tissue Eng 2010, 120623.
14. You M.-H., Kwak M.K., Kim D.-H., Kim K., Levchenko A., Kim D.-Y., et al. Synergistically enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by culture on nanostructured surfaces with induction media. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:1856-1862.
15. Vlacic-Zischke J., Hamlet S.M., Friis T., Tonetti M.S., Ivanovski S. The influence of surface microroughness and hydrophilicity of titanium on the up-regulation of TGFβ/BMP signalling in osteoblasts. Biomaterials 2011, 32:665-671.
16. Gittens R.A., Mclachlan T., Olivares-Navarrete R., Cai Y., Berner S., Tannenbaum R., et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials 2011, 32:3395-3403.
17. Wilkinson A., Hewitt R.N., Mcnamara L.E., Mccloy D., Dominic Meek R.M., Dalby M.J. Biomimetic microtopography to enhance osteogenesis in vitro. Acta Biomater 2011.
18. Mcnamara L.E., Sjostrom T., Burgess K.E., Kim J.J., Liu E., Gordonov S., et al. Skeletal stem cell physiology on functionally distinct titania nanotopographies. Biomaterials 2011, 32:7403-7410.
19. Ripamonti U, Kirkbride AN. Biomaterial and bone implant for bone repair and replacement. US Patent, No PCT WO95/3200, 1995.
20. Ripamonti U, Kirkbride AN. Biomaterial and bone implant for bone repair and replacement. US Patent, No US6,302,913B, 2001.
21. Williams D. The continuing evolution of biomaterials. Biomaterials 2011, 32:1-2.
22. Ripamonti U., Richter P.W., Thomas M.E. Self-inducing shape memory geometric cues embedded within smart hydroxyapatite-based biomimetic matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007, 120:1796-1807.
23. Ripamonti U. The morphogenesis of bone in replicas of porous hydroxyapatite obtained from conversion of calcium carbonate exoskeletons of coral. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1991, 73:692-703.
24. Ripamonti U. Osteoinduction in porous hydroxyapatite implanted in heterotopic sites of different animal models. Biomaterials 1996, 17:31-35.
25. Ripamonti U. Soluble osteogenic molecular signals and the induction of bone formation. Biomaterials 2006, 27:807-822.
26. Ripamonti U., Crooks J., Khoali L., Roden L. The induction of bone formation by coral-derived calcium carbonate/hydroxyapatite constructs. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1428-1439.
27. Ripamonti U. Biomimetism, biomimetic matrices and the induction of bone formation. J Cell Mol Med 2009, 13:2953-2972.
28. Ripamonti U., Roden L. Biomimetics for the induction of bone formation. Expert Rev Med Devices 2010, 7:469-479.
29. 3 and inhibition by zoledronate in macroporous coral-derived hydroxyapatites. Biomaterials 2010, 31:6400-6410.
30. Ripamonti U., Crooks J., Kirkbride A.N. Sintered porous hydroxyapatites with intrinsic osteoinductive activity: geometric induction of bone formation. S Afr J Sci 1999, 95:335-343.
31. Stevens M.M., Marini R.P., Schaefer D., Aronson J., Langer R., Shastri V.P. In vivo engineering of organs: the bone bioreactor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:11450-11455.
32. Heliotis M., Lavery K.M., Ripamonti U., Tsiridis E., Di Silvio L. Transformation of a prefabricated hydroxyapatite/osteogenic protein-1 implant into a vascularised pedicled bone flap in the human chest. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006, 35:265-269.
33. Public Service Department National code for animal use in research education, diagnosis and testing of drugs and related substances in South Africa 1990, Public Service Department, Pretoria, South Africa.
34. Schnitzler C.M., Ripamonti U., Mesquita J.M. Histomorphometry of iliac crest trabecular bone in adult male baboons in captivity. Calcif Tissue Int 1993, 52:447-454.
35. Dal Mas I., Biscardi A., Schnitzler C.M., Ripamonti U. Bone loss in the ovariectomized baboon Papio ursinus: densitometry, histomorphometry and biochemistry. J Cell Mol Med 2007, 11:852-867.
36. Donath K., Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982, 11:318-326.
37. Parfitt A.M. Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem 1994, 55:273-286.
38. Manolagas S.C., Jilka R.L. Bone marrow, cytokines, and bone remodeling. Emerging insights into the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1995, 332:305-311.
39. Ripamonti U., Klar R.M. Redundancy of osteogenic molecular signals initiating the induction of bone formation. Sci Africa 2010, http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2010/october/bone_regeneration_full.htm.
40. van Eeden S.P., Ripamonti U. Bone differentiation in porous hydroxyapatite in baboons is regulated by the geometry of the substratum: implications for reconstructive craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994, 93:959-966.
41. Kovacic J.C., Boehm M. Resident vascular progenitor cells: an emerging role for non-terminally differentiated vessel-resident cells in vascular biology. Stem Cell Res 2009, 2:2-15.
42. Sampath T.K., Reddi A.H. Dissociative extraction and reconstitution of extracellular matrix components involved in local bone differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1981, 78:7599-7603.
43. Khouri R.K., Koudsi B., Reddi H. Tissue transformation into bone in vivo. A potential practical application. JAMA 1991, 266:1953-1955.
44. Reddi A.H. Symbiosis of biotechnology and biomaterials: applications in tissue engineering of bone and cartilage. J Cell Biochem 1994, 56:192-195.
45. Reddi A.H. Morphogenesis and tissue engineering of bone and cartilage: inductive signals, stem cells, and biomimetic biomaterials. Tissue Eng 2000, 6:351-359.
46. Ripamonti U., Ramoshebi L.N., Patton J., Matsaba T., Teare J., Renton L. Soluble signals and insoluble substrata: novel molecular cues instructing the induction of bone. The skeleton 2004, 217-227. Humana Press, [Chapter 15]. E.J. Massaro, J.M. Rogers (Eds.).
47. Geblinger D., Addadi L., Geiger B. Nano-topography sensing by osteoclasts. J Cell Sci 2010, 123:1503-1510.
48. Zhao G., Raines A.L., Wieland M., Schwartz Z., Boyan B.D. Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 2007, 28:2821-2829.
49. Kohn E.C., Alessandro R., Spoonster J., Wersto R.P., Liotta L.A. Angiogenesis: role of calcium-mediated signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995, 92:1307-1311.
50. Munaron L. Intracellular calcium, endothelial cells and angiogenesis. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 2006, 1:105-119.
51. Wu Q., Shao H., Eton D., Li J., Li J., Yang B., et al. Extracellular calcium increases CXCR4 expression on bone marrow-derived cells and enhances pro-angiogenesis therapy. J Cell Mol Med 2009, 13:1-10.
52. Zayzafoon M. Calcium/calmodulin signaling controls osteoblast growth and differentiation. J Cell Biochem 2006, 97:56-70.
53. Ohgushi H., Dohi Y., Tamai S., Tabata S. Osteogenic differentiation of marrow stromal stem cells in porous hydroxyapatite ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 1993, 27:1401-1407.
54. Kanatani M., Sugimoto T., Fukase M., Fujita T. Effect of elevated extracellular calcium on the proliferation of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells: it direct and indirect effects via human monocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1991, 181:1425-1430.
55. Fujibayashi S., Neo M., Kim H.M., Kokubo T., Nakamura T. Osteoinduction of porous bioactive titanium metal. Biomaterials 2004, 25:443-450.
56. Fujibayashi S., Nakamura T., Nishiguchi S., Tamura J., Uchida M., Kim H.M., et al. Bioactive titanium: effect of sodium removal on the bone-bonding ability of bioactive titanium prepared by alkali and heat treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 2001, 56:562-570.