Attitudes towards biosample donation in andrology patients

International Journal of Andrology

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 170-175

  Ma, Yi ^a   Kong, Xianming ^a   Dai, Huili ^a   Wang, Limin ^a   Zhu, Lijun ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Andrology, attitude, tissue donation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANDROLOGY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BIOSAMPLE; CANCER PATIENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE; SPERM; TESTIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPECIMEN HANDLING; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858279941     PISSN: 01056263     EISSN: 13652605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01208.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abou-Zeid A, Silverman H, Shehata M, Shams M, Elshabrawy M, Hifnawy T et al. (2010) Collection, storage and use of blood samples for future research: views of Egyptian patients expressed in a cross-sectional survey. J Med Ethics 36, 539-547.
2. Critchley CR, Nicol D, Otlowski MF & Stranger MJ. (2010) Predicting intention to biobank: a national survey. Eur J Public Health in press.
3. DeCosta A, D'Souza N, Krishnan S, Chhabra MS, Shihaam I & Goswami K. (2004) Community based trials and informed consent in rural north India. J Med Ethics 30, 318-323.
4. Elger BS & Caplan AL. (2006) Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework. EMBO Rep 7, 661-666.
5. Fitzpatrick PE, McKenzie KD, Beasley A & Sheehan JD. (2009) Patients attending tertiary referral urology clinics: willingness to participate in tissue banking. BJU Int 104, 209-213.
6. Goodson ML & Vernon BG. (2004) A study of public opinion on the use of tissue samples from living subjects for clinical research. J Clin Pathol 57, 135-138.
7. Hansson MG. (2009) Ethics and biobanks. Br J Cancer 100, 8-12.
8. Hoeyer K, Olofsson BO, Mjörndal T & Lynöe N. (2004) Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research. Scand J Public Health 32, 224-229.
9. Hoeyer K, Olofsson B, Mjorndal T & Lynoe N. (2005) The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent. Arch Intern Med 165, 97-100.
10. Hoop JG, Roberts LW & Hammond KA. (2009) Genetic testing of stored biological samples: views of 570 U.S. workers. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 13, 331-337.
11. Johnsson L, Helgesson G, Rafnar T, Halldorsdottir I, Chia KS, Eriksson S & Hansson MG. (2010) Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research. Eur J Hum Genet 18, 1261-1264.
12. Kaufman D, Murphy J, Scott J & Hudson K. (2008) Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet Med 10, 831-839.
13. Kobayashi E & Satoh N. (2009) Public involvement in pharmacogenomics research: a national survey on public attitudes towards pharmacogenomics research and the willingness to donate DNA samples to a DNA bank in Japan. Cell Tissue Bank 10, 281-291.
14. Mancini J, Pellegrini I, Viret F, Vey N, Daufresne LM, Chabannon C & Julian-Reynier C. (2010) Consent for biobanking: assessing the understanding and views of cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 103, 154-157.
15. McQuillan GM, Porter KS, Agelli M & Kington R. (2003) Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience. Genet Med 5, 35-42.
16. McQuillan GM, Pan Q & Porter KS. (2006) Consent for genetic research in a general population: an update on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey experience. Genet Med 8, 354-360.
17. Melas PA, Sjöholm LK, Forsner T, Edhborg M, Juth N, Forsell Y & Lavebratt C. (2010) Examining the public refusal to consent to DNA biobanking: empirical data from a Swedish population-based study. J Med Ethics 36, 93-98.
18. Murphy EJ, Wickramaratne P & Weissman MM. (2009) Racial and ethnic differences in willingness to participate in psychiatric genetic research. Psychiatr Genet 19, 186-194.
19. Pentz RD, Billot L & Wendler D. (2006) Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A 140, 733-739.
20. Renegar G, Webster CJ, Stuerzebecher S, Harty L, Ide SE, Balkite B et al. (2006) Returning genetic research results to individuals: points-to-consider. Bioethics 20, 24-36.
21. Toccaceli V, Fagnani C, Nisticò L, D'Ippolito C, Giannantonio L, Brescianini S & Stazi MA. (2009) Research understanding, attitude and awareness towards biobanking: a survey among Italian twin participants to a genetic epidemiological study. BMC Med Ethics 10, 4.
22. Treweek S, Doney A & Leiman D. (2009) Public attitudes to the storage of blood left over from routine general practice tests and its use in research. J Health Serv Res Policy 14, 13-19.
23. Wang SS, Fridinger F, Sheedy KM & Khoury MJ. (2001) Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood for genetic research. Community Genet 4, 18-26.
24. Wendler D. (2006) One-time general consent for research on biological samples. BMJ 332, 544-547.
25. Wendler D & Emanuel E. (2002) The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think? Arch Intern Med 162, 1457-1462.