Consent for biobanking: Assessing the understanding and views of cancer patients

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 154-157

  Mancini, Julien ^a,b,c   Pellegrini, Isabelle ^a,b   Viret, Frédéric ^d,e   Vey, Norbert ^a,d,e   Daufresne, Lise Marie ^d,e   Chabannon, Christian ^a,d,e   Julian Reynier, Claire ^a,b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIV   (France)

^c TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^e INSTITUT PAOLI CALMETTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RESEARCH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLORECTAL CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEW; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; TISSUE SECTION;

ADULT; AGED; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CANCER CARE FACILITIES; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 79251481828     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: 14602105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq498     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Pellegrini I, Chabannon C, Mancini J, Viret F, Vey N, Julian-Reynier C. Informed consent for biobanks and research: what make sense for cancer patients? Psychol Health. 2009; 24(suppl 1):307-308.
2. Axler RE, Irvine R, Lipworth W, Morrell B, Kerridge IH. Why might people donate tissue for cancer research? Insights from organ/tissue/blood donation and clinical research. Pathobiology. 2008;75(6):323-329.
3. Chabannon C, Honstettre A, Daufresne LM, et al. La publication de catalogues de collections d'échantillons biologiques par les tumor-othèques. Bull Cancer. 2010;97(2):181-189.
4. Hansson MG. Ethics and biobanks. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(1):8-12.
5. Petrini C. "Broad" consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(2):217-220.
6. Pentz RD, Billot L, Wendler D. Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140(7): 733-739.
7. Kaphingst KA, Janoff JM, Harris LN, Emmons KM. Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research. Clin Genet. 2006;69(5):393-398.
8. Vermeulen E, Schmidt MK, Aaronson NK, et al. A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples Br J Cancer 2009 101 (9):1505-1512
9. Vermeulen E, Schmidt MK, Aaronson NK, et al. Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment. J Clin Pathol. 2009; 62(3):275-278.
10. Wendler D, Emanuel E. The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think? Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(13):1457-1462. (Pubitemid 34747478)
11. Dressler LG, Terry SF. How will GINA in-fuence participation in pharmacogenomics research and clinical testing? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86(5):472-475.
12. Gandour-Edwards R, Nguyen H, Castillo M, Soares S. Patient consent: a major obstacle in tissue banking? Perspectives from the UC Davis Cancer Center. Cell Preserv Tech. 2007; 5(3):151-154.
13. Malone T, Catalano PJ, O'Dwyer PJ, Giantonio B. High rate of consent to bank biologic samples for future research: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(10):769-771.
14. Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF. Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(21):1446- 1452.
15. Ransohoff DF, Gourlay ML. Sources of bias in specimens for research about molecular markers for cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(4): 698-704.
16. Ormond KE, Cirino AL, Helenowski IB, Chisholm RL, Wolf WA. Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(2):188-198.
17. Moutel G, de Montgolfer S, Meningaud JP, Herve C. Bio-libraries and DNA storage: assessment of patient perception of information. Med Law. 2001;20(2):193-204.
18. Hoeyer K, Olofsson BO, Mjorndal T, Lynoe N. The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(1):97-100.
19. Hewitt R, Watson PH, Dhir R, et al. Timing of consent for the research use of surgically removed tissue: is postoperative consenting acceptable? Cancer. 2009;115(1):4-9.
20. Portnoy DB. Waiting is the hardest part: anticipating medical test results affects processing and recall of important information. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(2):421-428.