Social mobility and demographic behavior: Long term perspectives

Demographic Research

Volumn 26, Issue , 2012, Pages 173-190

  Dribe, Martin ^a   Van Bavel, Jan ^b   Campbell, Cameron ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858216941     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14359871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.8     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Akerlof, G.A. (1998). Men without children. Economic Journal 108(447): 287-309.
2. Angrist, J. and Evans, W. (1998). Children and their parents' labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review 88: 450-477.
3. Arrizabalaga, M.-P. (2005). Pyrenean marriage strategies in the nineteenth century: The French Basque case. International Review of Social History 50(Suppl. S13): 93-122.
4. Bartlett, R.L. and Callahan, C. (1984). Wage determination and marital status: Another look. Industrial Relations 23(1): 90-96.
5. Becker, G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Bengtsson, T., Campbell, C., and Lee, J. (2004). Life Under Pressure: Mortality and Living Standards in Asia, 1700-1900. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Benham, L. (1974). Benefits of women's education within marriage. Journal of Political Economy 82(2): S57-S71.
8. Bernardi, F. (1999). Does the husband matter? Married women and employment in Italy. European Sociological Review 15(3): 285-300.
9. Bernasco, W., de Graaf, P.M., and Ultee, W.C. (1998). Coupled careers. Effects of spouse's resources on occupational attainment in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review 14(1): 15-31.
10. Blackburn, M. and Korenman, S. (1994). The declining marital-status earnings differential. Journal of Population Economics 7(3): 247-270.
11. Blake, J. (1989). Family Size and Achievement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Blossfeld, H.-P. and Drobnic, S. (eds.) (2001). Careers of Couples in Contemporary Society. From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Bras, H. and Kok, J. (2005). 'They live in indifference together': Marriage mobility in Zeeland, The Netherlands, 1796-1922. International Review of Social History 50(Suppl. S13): 247-274.
14. Bras, H., Kok, J., and Mandemakers, K. (2010). Sibship size and status attainment across contexts: Evidence from the Netherlands, 1840-1925. Demographic Research 23(4): 73-104.
15. Breschi, M., Manfredini, M., and Mazzoni, S. (2010). Health and socio-demographic conditions as determinants of marriage and social mobility: Male partner choice in Sardinia, late 19th-early 20th centuries. Demographic Research 22(33): 1037-1056.
16. Bull, H.H. (2005). Deciding whom to marry in a rural two-class society: Social homogamy and constraints in the marriage market in Rendalen, Norway, 1750-1900. International Review of Social History 50(Suppl. S13): 43-64.
17. Chun, H. and Lee, I. (2001). Why do married men earn more: Productivity or marriage selection? Economic Inquiry 39(2): 307-319.
18. Dalla Zuanna, G. (2007). Social mobility and fertility. Demographic Research 17(15): 441-464.
19. Dougherty, C. (2006). The marriage earnings premium as a distributed fixed effect. Journal of Human Resources 41(2): 433-443.
20. Dribe, M. and Lundh, C. (2005). Finding the right partner: Rural homogamy in nineteenth-century Sweden. International Review of Social History 50(Suppl. S13): 149-178.
21. Dribe, M. and Lundh, C. (2010). Marriage choices and social reproduction: The interrelationship between partner selection and intergenerational socioeconomic mobility in 19th-century Sweden. Demographic Research 22(14): 347-382.
22. Dumont, A. (1890/1990). Depopulation et civilisation: étude démographique. Paris: Economica.
23. Duvander, A.-Z. (2000). Couples in Sweden. Studies on Family and Work [Ph.D. dissertation]. Stockholm University, Swedish Institute for Social Research.
24. Ferrari, G. and Dalla Zuanna, G. (2010). Siblings and human capital: A comparison between Italy and France. Demographic Research 23(21): 587-614.
25. Ferrie, J.P. (1999). Yankeys now: Immigrants in the antebellum U.S. 1840-1860. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Ginther, D.K. and Zavodny, M. (2001). Is the male marriage premium due to selection? The effect of shotgun weddings on the return to marriage. Journal of Population Economics 14(2): 313-328.
27. Gray, J.S. (1997). The fall in men's return to marriage. Declining productivity effects or changing selection? Journal of Human Resources 32(3): 481-504.
28. Helgertz, J. (2011). Thou shalt not pass? Examining the existence of an immigrant glass ceiling in Sweden, 1970-1990. Demographic Research 24(1): 1-44.
29. Hill, M.S. (1979). The wage effects of marital status and children. Journal of Human Resources 14(4): 579-594.
30. Jepsen, L.K. (2005). The relationship between wife's education and husband's earnings: Evidence from 1960 to 2000. Review of Economics of the Household 3(2): 197-214.
31. Korenman, S. and Neumark, D. (1991). Does marriage really make men more productive? Journal of Human Resources 26(2): 282-307.
32. Korenman, S. and Neumark, D. (1992). Marriage, motherhood, and wages. Journal of Human Resources 27(2): 233-255.
33. Krashinsky, H.A. (2004). Do marital status and computer use really change the wage structure? Journal of Human Resources 39(3): 774-791.
34. Kye, B. (2011). Intergenerational transmission of women's educational attainment in South Korea: An application of a multi-group population projection model. Demographic Research 24(3): 79-112.
35. Laslett, P. (1977). Family life and illicit love in earlier generations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Long, J. (2005). Rural-urban migration and socioeconomic mobility in Victorian Britain. Journal of Economic History 65(1): 1-35.
37. Loughran, D.S. and Zissimopoulos, J.M. (2009). Why wait? The effect of marriage and childbearing on the wages of men and women. Journal of Human Resources 44: 326-349.
38. Maas, I. and Zijdeman, R.L. (2010). Beyond the local marriage market: The influence of modernization on geographical heterogamy. Demographic Research 23(33): 933-962.
39. Mare, R.D. and Maralani, V. (2006). The intergenerational effects of changes in women's educational attainments. American Sociological Review 71(4): 542-564.
40. Marteleto, L. (2010). Family size, adolescents' schooling and the demographic transition: Evidence from Brazil. Demographic Research 23(15): 421-444.
41. McLanahan, S. and Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology 34: 257-276.
42. Mills, M. and Begall, K. (2010). Preferences for the sex composition of children in Europe: A multilevel examination of its effect on progression to a third child. Population Studies 64(1): 77-95.
43. Mitterauer, M. (1988). Ungdomstidens sociala historia [Sozialgeschichte der Jugend]. Göteborg: Röda bokförlaget.
44. Mitterauer, M. and Sieder, R. (1982). The European family. Patriarchy to partnership from the middle ages to the present. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
45. Morgan, S.L. and Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Nakosteen, R.A., Westerlund, O., and Zimmer, M.A. (2004). Marital matching and earnings. Evidence from the unmarried population in Sweden. Journal of Human Resources 39(4): 1033-1044.
47. Nakosteen, R.A. and Zimmer, M.A. (1997). Men, money and marriage: Are high earners more prone than low earners to marry? Social Science Quarterly 78(1): 66-82.
48. Nakosteen, R.A. and Zimmer, M.A. (2001). Spouse selection and earnings: Evidence of marital sorting. Economic Inquiry 39(2): 201-213.
49. Schulz, W. and Maas, I. (2010). Studying historical occupational careers with multilevel growth models. Demographic Research 23(24): 669-696.
50. Shorter, E. (1977). The making of the modern family. New York: Fontana Books.
51. Stewart, J.I. (2006). Migration to the agricultural frontier and wealth accumulation, 1860-1870. Explorations in Economic History 43(4): 547-577.
52. Stone, L. (1977). The family, sex and marriage in England 1500-1800. London: Weidenfeldt and Nicholson.
53. Tilly, L.A. and Scott, J.W. (1989). Women, Work and Family. London and New York: Routledge.
54. Tsuya, N., Wang, F., Alter, G., Lee, J. et al. (2010). Prudence and Pressure. Reproduction and Human Agency in Europe and Asia, 1700-1900. Cambridge: MIT Press.
55. Van Bavel, J. (2006). The effect of fertility limitation on intergenerational social mobility: The quality-quantity trade-off during the demographic transition. Journal of Biosocial Science 38(4): 553-569.
56. Van Bavel, J., Moreels, S., Van de Putte, B., and Matthijs, K. (2011). Family size and integenerational social mobility during the fertility transition: Evidence of resource dilution from the city of Antwerp in nineteenth century Belgium. Demographic Research 24(14): 313-344.
57. Van Leeuwen, M.H.D. and Maas, I. (2002). Partner choice and homogamy in the nineteenth century: Was there a sexual revolution in Europe? Journal of Social History 36(1): 101-123.