Obtaining protein solvent accessible surface area when structural data is unavailable using osmotic pressure

AIChE Journal

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1012-1017

  McBride, Devin W ^a   Rodgers, V G J ^a  

^a University of California Riverside   (United States)

Author keywords

Alpha crystallin; Beta lactoglobulin; Free solvent model; Hemoglobin; Hydration; Ion binding; Osmotic pressure; SASA; Solvent accessible surface area

Indexed keywords

ALPHA-CRYSTALLIN; BETA-LACTOGLOBULIN; ION BINDING; SASA; SOLVENT ACCESSIBLE SURFACE AREA;

AGGREGATES; HEMOGLOBIN; HYDRATION; OSMOSIS; WOOL;

SOLVENTS;

BOVINAE; OVIS ARIES;

EID: 84858151919     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12648     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Lee B, Richards FM. Interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971; 55: 379-400.
2. Greer J, Bush BL. Macromolecular shape and surface maps by solvent exclusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978; 75: 303-307.
3. McMillan WG, Mayer JE. The statistical thermodynamics of multicomponent systems. J Chem Phys. 1945; 13: 276-305.
4. Yousef MA, Datta R, Rodgers VGJ. Free-solvent model of osmotic pressure revisited: application to concentrated IgG solution under physiological conditions. J Colloid Interf Sci. 1998; 197: 108-118.
5. Yousef MA, Datta R, Rodgers VGJ. Understanding nonidealities of the osmotic pressure of concentrated bovine serum albumin. J Colloid Interf Sci. 1998; 207: 273-282.
6. Yousef MA, Datta R, Rodgers VGJ. Confirmation of free solvent model assumptions in predicting the osmotic pressure of concentrated globular proteins. J Colloid Interf Sci. 2001; 243: 321-325.
7. Yousef MA, Datta R, Rodgers VGJ. Model of osmotic pressure for high concentrated binary protein solutions. AIChE J. 2002; 48: 913-917.
8. Yousef MA, Datta R, Rodgers VGJ. Monolayer hydration governs nonideality in osmotic pressure of protein solutions. AIChE J. 2002; 48: 1301-1308.
9. van Laar JJ. On the exact formulas for the osmotic pressure, for the changes to the solubility, for freezing point-and boiling point-changes, and for the solutions-and dilutions-warm with bodies dissociated in solution. Zeitschrift fuer Physikalisch Chemie. 1894; 15: 457-497.
10. Lewis GN, Randall M. Thermodynamics, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.
11. Dick DAT, An approach to the molecular structure of the living cell by water flux studies. In: Reeve EB, Guyton AG, editors. Physical Bases of Circulatory Transport. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1967.
12. Perutz MF, Muirhead H, Cox JM, Goaman LCG. Three-dimensional fourier synthesis of horse oxyhaemoglobin at 2.8 A resolution: the atomic model. Nature. 1968; 219: 131-139.
13. Parker R, Noel TR, Brownsey GJ, Laos K, Ring SG. The Nonequilibrium Phase and Glass Transition Behavior of β-Lactoglobulin. Biophysical Journal. 2005; 89(2): 1227-1236.
14. Vijayalakshmi L, Krishna R, Sankaranarayanan R, Vijayan M. An asymmetric dimer of beta-lactoglobulin in a low humidity crystal form-structural changes that accompany partial dehydration and protein action. Proteins. 2008; 71: 241-249.
15. Loch J, Polit A, Górecki A, Bonarek P, Kurpiewska K, Dziedzicka-Wasylewska M, Lewiński K. Two modes of fatty acid binding to bovine β-lactoglobulin-crystallographic and spectroscopic studies. J Mol Recogn. 2011; 24: 341-349.
16. Qin BY, Bewley MC, Creamer LK, Baker HM, Baker EN, Jameson GB, Structural basis of the tanford transition of bovine beta-lactoglobulin. Biochemistry. 1998; 37(40): 14014-14023.
17. Vérétout F, Delaye M, Tardieu A. Molecular basis of eye lens transparency osmotic pressure and x-ray- analysis of α-crystallin solutions. J Mol Biol. 1989; 205: 713-728.
18. Rupley JA, Careri G. Protein hydration and function. Adv Protein Chem. 1991; 4: 137-172.
19. Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-Pdb Viewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis. 1997; 18: 2714-2723.
20. Koradi R, Billeter M, Wüthrich K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph. 1996; 14: 51-55.
21. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera-A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004; 25: 1605-1612.
22. Fraczkiewicz R, Braun W. Exact and efficient analytical calculation of the accessible surface areas and their gradients for macromolecules. J Comput Chem. 1998; 19: 319-333.
23. Arosio D, Kwansa HE, Bucci E. Preferential hydration and buoyancy of hemoglobins detected by static and dynamic light scattering. Biophys J. 1999; 76: A426-A426.
24. Arosio D, Kwansa HE, Gering H, Piszczek G, Bucci W. Static and dynamic light scattering approach to the hydration of hemoglobin and its supertetramers in the presence of osmolites. Biopolymers. 2002; 63: 1-11.
25. De Rosa MC, Castagnola M, Bertonati C, Galtieri A, Giardina B. From the arctic to fetal life: physiological importance and structural basis of an "additional" chloride-binding site in haemoglobin. Biochem J. 2004; 380: 889-896.
26. Scatchard G, Coleman JS, Shen AL. Physical chemistry of protein solutions. VII. The binding of small anions to serum albumin. J Am Chem Soc. 1957; 79: 12-20.
27. Scatchard G, Scheinberg IH, Armstrong SH. Physical chemical of protein solutions. IV. The combination of human serum albumin with chloride ion. J Am Chem Soc. 1950; 72: 535-540.
28. Wang GK, Lu Y, Yan CL. Study of the binding of chloride ion to hemoglobin using electromotive force method. J Chin Chem Soc. 2009; 56: 368-373.
29. 17O spin relaxation in deeply supercooled solutions. Biophys J. 2008; 95: 2951-2963.
30. Doss EW, Ward KA, Koretz JF. Preliminary studies on the aggregation process of α-crystallin. Exp Eye Res. 1997; 65: 255-266.
31. Babizhayev MA, Nikolayev GN, Goryachev SN, Bours J. nmr spin-echo studies of hydration properties of the molecular chaperone α-crystallin in the bovine lens. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Proteins Proteomics. 2002; 1598: 46-54.
32. Babizhayev MA, Nikolayev GM, Goryachev SN, Bours J, Martin R. Hydration properties of the molecular caperone α-crystallin in the bovine lens. Biochem. 2003; 68: 1145-1155.
33. Regini JW, Grossmann JG, Timmins P, Harding JJ, Quantock AJ, Hodson SA, Elliott GF. X-ray- and neutron-scattering studies of α-crystallin and evidence that the target protein sits in the fenestrations of the α-crystallin shell. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2007; 48: 2695-2700.
34. Thomson JA, Augusteyn RC. On the structure of α-crystallin: the minimum molecular weight. Curr Eye Res. 1988; 7: 563-569.
35. Bassi FA, Arcovito G, DeSpirito M, Mordente A, Martorana GE. Self-similarity properties of α-crystallin supramolecular aggregates. Biophys J. 1995; 69: 2720-2727.
36. Singh K, GrothVasselli B, Farnsworth PN. Electrostatic parameters of the theoretical quaternary structure of bovine α-crystallin. Int J Biol Macromol. 1996; 18: 205-209.
37. Horwitz J, Bova MP, Ding LL, Haley DA, Stewart PL. Lens α-crystallin: function and structure. Eye. 1999; 13: 403-408.
38. Liu XS, Fan K, Wang W. The number of protein folds and their distribution over families in nature. Proteins. 2004; 54: 491-499.