Bioethical considerations in developing a biorepository for the pneumonia etiology research for child health project

Clinical Infectious Diseases

Volumn 54, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2012, Pages

  Deluca, Andrea N ^a   Regenberg, Alan ^b   Sugarman, Jeremy ^a,b,c   Murdoch, David R ^d,e   Levine, Orin ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^e CANTERBURY HEALTH LABORATORIES   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CENTRALIZATION; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH; CLINICAL DATA REPOSITORY; DECENTRALIZATION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PNEUMONIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE SECTION;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; CULTURE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH DESIGN; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PNEUMONIA; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 84858115932     PISSN: 10584838     EISSN: 15376591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir1063     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Shann F. Etiology of severe pneumonia in children in developing countries. Pediatr Infect Dis 1986; 5:247-52. (Pubitemid 16162869)
2. Wall RA, Corrah PT, Mabey DC, Greenwood BM. The etiology of lobar pneumonia in the Gambia. Bull World Health Organ 1986; 64: 553-8. (Pubitemid 17177275)
3. Ikeogu MO. Acute pneumonia in Zimbabwe: bacterial isolates by lung aspiration. Arch Dis Child 1988; 63:1266-7.
4. Briese T, Palacios G, Kokoris M, et al. Diagnostic system for rapid and sensitive differential detection of pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11:310-13. (Pubitemid 40239252)
5. Dominguez SR, Briese T, Palacios G, et al. Multiplex MassTag-PCR for respiratory pathogens in pediatric nasopharyngeal washes negative by conventional diagnostic testing shows a high prevalence of viruses belonging to a newly recognized rhinovirus clade. J Clin Virol 2008; 43:219-22.
6. Hansson MG. Ethics and biobanks. Br J Cancer 2008; 100:8-12.
7. Hoeyer K. The ethics of research biobanking: a critical review of the literature. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 2009; 25:429-52.
8. Cambon-Thomsen A, Rial-Sebbag E, Knoppers BM. Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks. Eur Respir J 2007; 30:373-82. (Pubitemid 47194191)
9. Budimir D, Polasek O, Marusić A, et al. Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review. Croat Med J 2011; 52:262-79.
10. Mello MM, Wolf LE. The Havasupai Indian tribe case-lessons for research involving stored biologic samples. N Engl JMed 2010; 363:204-7.
11. Fullerton SM, Anderson NR, Guzauskas G, Freeman D, Fryer-Edwards K. Meeting the governance challenges of next-generation biorepository research. Sci Transl Med 2010; 2:15cm3.
12. Karp DR, Carlin S, Cook-Deegan R, et al. Ethical and practical issues associated with aggregating databases. PLoS Med 2008; 5:e190.
13. Winickoff DE, Winickoff RN. The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:1180-4. (Pubitemid 37122332)
14. Meslin EM. The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13:207-14.
15. Gottweis H, Lauss G. Biobank governance in the post-genomic age. Personalized Med 2010; 7:187-95.
16. Tutton R. Biobanking: social, political and ethical aspects. In: Encyclopedia of Life Science (ELS). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, LTD, 2001.
17. Mitchell R, Conley JM, Davis AM, Cadigan RJ, Dobson AW, Gladden RQ. Genomics, biobanks, and the trade-secret model. Science 2011; 332:309-10.
18. Kaye J, Stranger M, eds. Principles and practice in biobank governance. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2009.
19. Lavori PW, Krause-Steinrauf H, Brophy M, et al. Principles, organization, and operation of a DNA bank for clinical trials: a department of veterans affairs cooperative study. Control Clin Trials 2002; 23:222-39. (Pubitemid 34621205)
20. Austin MA, Harding SE, McElroy CE. Monitoring ethical, legal, and social issues in developing population genetic databases. Genet Med 2003; 5:451-7. (Pubitemid 37492814)
21. Elger B, Biller-Andorno N, Mauron A, Capron AM. Ethical issues in governing biobanks: global perspectives. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2008.
22. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. About IARC. Cancer IAfRo. Available at: http://www.iarc.fr/en/about/governance. php. Accessed 3 August 2011.
23. Bledsoe M. Human specimen & data repositories: legal and ethical challenges. Available at: www.jhsph.edu/irb-PDF/ bledsoerepositoriesbioethicsinterestgroup10-09.ppt. Accessed 9 January 2012.
24. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Global access: technology and information management. http://www.gatesfoundation.org/grantseeker/Documents/ TechInfo-Management-Module.doc. Accessed 5 August 2011.
25. O'Brien SJ. Stewardship of human biospecimens, DNA, genotype, and clinical data in the GWAS era. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2009; 10:193-209.
26. Malinowski MJ. Technology transfer in biobanking: credits, debits, and population health futures. J Law Med Ethics 2005; 33:54-69. (Pubitemid 40598045)
27. Salvaterra E, Lecchi L, Giovanelli S, et al. Banking together: a unified model of informed consent for biobanking. EMBO Rep 2008; 9:307-13.
28. Caulfield T, Upshur R, Daar A. DNA databanks and consent: a suggested policy option involving an authorization model. BMC Med Ethics 2003; 4:1.
29. Hofmann B, Solbakk JH, Holm S. Consent to biobank research: one size fits all? In: Solbakk JH, Holm S, Hofmann B, eds. The ethics of research biobanking. New York: Springer US, 2009: 3-23.
30. Furness PN. One-time general consent for research on biological samples: good idea, but will it happen? BMJ 2006; 332:665. (Pubitemid 44365732)