Managing Performance to Change Behavior

Journal of Organizational Behavior Management

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 262-276

  DeNisi, Angelo S ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

appraisal; improvement; performance management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858067641     PISSN: 01608061     EISSN: 15408604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01608061.2011.619414     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aguinis, H. 2009. Performance management, 2nd, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
2. Berkshire, H. and Highland, R. 1953. Forced-choice performance rating: A methodological stud. Personnel Psychology, 6: 355-378.
3. Bernardin, H. J. and Buckley, M. R. 1981. A consideration of strategies in rater training. Academy of Management, 6: 205-212.
4. Bernardin, H. J. and Pence, E. C. 1980. Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65: 60-66.
5. Bolino, M. C., Varela, J. A., Bande, B. and Turnely, W. H. 2006. The impact of impression management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 281-297.
6. Borman, W. C. 1977. Consistency of rating accuracy and rater errors in the judgment of human performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 20: 238-252.
7. Borman, W. C. 1987. Personal constructs, performance schemata, and "folk theories" of subordinate effectiveness: Exploration in an army officer sample. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40: 307-322.
8. Borman, W. C. 2004. The concept of organizational citizenship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13: 238-241.
9. Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D. and Motowidlo, S. J. 2001. Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9: 52-69.
10. Borman, W. C. and Motowidlo, S. J. 1993. "Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance". In Personnel selection in organizations, Edited by: Schmitt, N. and Borman, W. 71-98. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Boswell, W. R. and Boudreau, J. W. 2001. How leading companies create, measure, and achieve results through "line of sight. Management Decisions, 39: 851-859.
12. Brannick, M. T., Salas, E. and Prince, C., eds. 1997. Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Brief, A. P. and Motowidlo, S. J. 1986. Prosocial organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 11: 710-725.
14. Cardy, R. L. and Dobbins, G. H. 1994. Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives, Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.
15. Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R. and Williams, R. E. 1989. Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 130-135.
16. Coens, T. and Jenkins, M. 2000. Abolishing performance appraisals: Why they backfire and what to do instead, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Keohler.
17. DeNisi, A. S. 1996. Cognitive processes in performance appraisal: A research agenda with implications for practice, London, England: Routledge.
18. DeNisi, A. S. 2000. "Performance appraisal and control systems: A Multilevel approach". In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations, Edited by: Klein, K. and Kozlowski, S. 121-156. San Francisco, CA: SIOP Frontiers Series, Jossey-Bass.
19. DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P. and Meglino, B. M. 1984. A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33: 360-396.
20. DeNisi, A. S. and Gonzalez, J. A. 2004. "Design performance appraisal to improve performance". In The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior, Edited by: Locke, E. A. 60-72. London, England: Blackwell.
21. DeNisi, A. S. and Peters, L. H. 1996. The organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 717-737.
22. DeNisi, A. S. and Pritchard, R. D. 2006. Improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2: 253-277.
23. DeNisi, A. S. and Sonesh, S. 2011. "Appraising and managing performance at work". In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Edited by: Zedeck, S., Aquinis, H. and Zhou, J. 255-280. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. Dunnette, M. D. 1963. A note on the criterion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47: 351-354.
25. Feldman, J. M. 1981. Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66: 127-148.
26. Flanagan, J. C. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51: 327-358.
27. Goodman, P. S. 1986. "Impact of task and technology on group performance". In Designing effective work groups, Edited by: Goodman, P. S. 120-167. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Greenberg, J. 1986. Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 340-342.
29. Herold, D. M., Liden, R. C. and Leatherwood, M. L. 1987. Using multiple attributes to assess sources of performance feedback. Academy of Management Journal, 30: 826-835.
30. Huselid, M. A. 1996. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial reporting. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 779-801.
31. Ilgen, D. R. 1993. "Performance appraisal accuracy: An illusive and sometimes misguided goal". In Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives, Edited by: Schuler, H., Farr, J. L. and Smith, M. 235-252. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Ilgen, D. R. and Feldman, J. M. 1983. "Performance appraisal: A process focus". In Research in organizational behavior, Edited by: Cummings, L. and Staw, B. Vol. 5, 349-380. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
33. Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D. and Taylor, M. S. 1979. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64: 347-371.
34. Johnson, J. 2005. Employees' justice perceptions of performance appraisals systems: Attitudinal, behavioral, and performance consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 937-939.
35. Kluger, A. N. and DeNisi, A. S. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, meta-analysis, a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 254-284.
36. Kluger, A. N. and DeNisi, A. S. 1998. Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edge sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7: 67-72.
37. Komaki, J. L. 1998. When performance improvement is the goal: A new set of criteria for criteria. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31: 263-280.
38. Komaki, J. L. and Minnich, M. R. 2001. "Developing performance appraisals: Criteria for what and how performance is measured". In Handbook of organizational performance: Behavior analysis and management, Edited by: Johnson, C. M., Redmon, W. K. and Mawhinney, T. C. 51-67. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
39. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R. and Smith, E. M. 1999. "Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance over time". In The changing nature of work and performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development, Edited by: Ilgen, D. R. and Pulakos, E. D. 240-292. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40. Landy, F. J., Barnes, J and Murphy, K. 1978. Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 751-754.
41. Landy, F. J. and Farr, J. L. 1980. Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87: 72-107.
42. Latane, B., Williams, K. and Harkins, S. 1979. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 822-832.
43. Latham, G. P., Wexley, K. N. and Pursell, E. P. 1975. Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65: 422-427.
44. Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
45. Meyer, H. H., Kay, E. and French, J. R. P. 1965. Split roles in performance appraisals. Harvard Business Review, 43: 123-129.
46. Murphy, K. R. and Balzer, W. K. 1989. Rater errors and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 619-624.
47. Murphy, K. R. and Cleveland, J. N. 1995. Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D. and Ilgen, D. R. 1980. A theory of behavior in organizations, New York, NY: Academic Press.
49. Organ, D. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
50. Porter, C. 2005. Goal orientation: Effects on backing-up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 811-818.
51. Pritchard, R. D., Holling, H., Lammers, F. and Clark, B. D., eds. 2002. Improving organizational performance with the Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System: An international collaboration, Huntington, NY: Nova Science.
52. Pritchard, R. D., Jones, S. D., Roth, P. L., Steubing, K. K. and Ekeberg, S. E. 1988. The effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 73: 337-358.
53. Pulakos, E. D. 1984. A comparison of rater training programs: Error training and accuracy training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 581-588.
54. Pulakos, E. D. 2004. A roadmap for developing, implementing, and evaluating performance management systems, Alexandria, VA: SHRM Foundation.
55. Pulakos, E. D. 2009. Performance management: A new approach for driving business results, Madden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
56. Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C. and Van Dyne, L. 1993. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 61-71.
57. Smith, P. C. and Kendall, L. M. 1963. Retranslations of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47: 149-155.
58. Smither, J. W., ed. 1998. Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
59. Sulsky, L. M. and Balzer, W. K. 1998. The meaning and measurement of performance appraisal accuracy: Some methodological concerns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 497-506.
60. Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K. and Carroll, S. J. 1995. Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 495-523.
61. Thorndike, E. L. 1920. A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4: 469-477.
62. Van Scotter, J. R., Motowidlo, S. J. and Cross, T. C. 2000. Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systematic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 526-535.
63. Varma, A., DeNisi, A. S. and Peters, L. H. 1996. Interpersonal affect in performance appraisal: A field study. Personnel Psychology, 49: 341-360.
64. Weitz, J. 1961. Criteria for criteria. American Psychologist, 16: 228-232.
65. Williams, K. J., DeNisi, A. S., Blencoe, A. G. and Cafferty, T. P. 1985. The role of appraisal purpose: Effects of purpose on information acquisition and utilization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35: 314-339.