Performance Management: A New Approach for Driving Business Results

Performance Management: A New Approach for Driving Business Results

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-201

  Pulakos, Elaine D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952183937     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444308747     Document Type: Book

References (56)

1. Muchinsky, P. M. (1997). Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
2. Patterson, D. G. (1922). The Scott Company graphic rating scale. Journal of Personnel Research, 1, 361-376.
3. Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917-1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836-874.
4. Dunnette, M. D. (1963). A note on the criterion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 251-254.
5. Guion, R. M. (1961). Criterion measurement and personnel judgments. Personnel Psychology, 4, 141-149.
6. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bullstin, 51, 327-358.
7. Drucker, P. (1954) The practice of management. New York: Harper Row.
8. Smith, P. C., & Kendall, L. M. (1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149-155.
9. Borman, W. C. (1979). Format and training effects on rating accuracy and rating errors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 410-421.
10. Borman, W. C., Hough, L. M., & Dunnette, M. D. (1976). Development of behaviorally based rating scales for evaluating U. S. Navy Recruiters. (Technical Report TR-76-31). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
11. Latham, G. P., & Wexley, K. N. (1981). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. EOCC (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal register, 43, 38295-38315.
13. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures, fourth edition. Bowling Green, OH: author.
14. Williams, S. B., & Leavitt, H. J. (1947). Group opinion as a predictor of military leadership. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 283-291.
15. Lawler, E. E. (1967). The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 369-381.
16. Hedge, J. W., Borman, W. C., & Birkeland, S. A. (2001). History and development of multisource feedback as a methodology. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, & Church (Eds.), The handbook of multisource feedback (pp. 15-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Spencer, L., & Spencer, S. (1994). Competence at work. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
18. Pulakos, E. D., Hanson, R. M., & O'Leary, R. D. (2008). Performance management in the United States. In A. Varma, P. Budhwan and A. Denisi (Eds.), Global performance management. London: Routledge.
19. Hillgren, J. S., & Cheatham, D. W. (2000). Understanding performance measures: An approach to linking rewards to the achievement of organizational objectives. Scottsdale, AZ: World at Work.
20. Rotchford, N. L. (2002) Performance management. In J. W. Hedge & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), Implementing organizational interventions (pp. 167-197). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Greguras, G. J., Robie, C., Schleicher, D. J., Goff, M. (2003). A field study of the effects of rating purpose on the quality of multisource ratings. Personnel Psychology, 56, 1-21.
22. Ghorpade, J. (2000). Managing the five paradoxes of 360-degree feedback. Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 140-150.
23. Waldman, D., & Atwater, L. E. (1998). The power of 360-degree feedback: How to leverage performance evaluations for top productivity. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
24. Greguras, G. J., Robie, C., Schleicher, D. J., Goff, M. (2003). A field study of the effects of rating purpose on the quality of multisource ratings. Personnel Psychology, 56, 1-21.
25. Borman, W. C. (1987). Behavior-based rating scales. In R. A. Berk (Ed.). Performance assessment: Methods and application. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Rodgers, R., Hunter, J. E., & Rogers, D. L. (1993). Influence of top management commitment on management program success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 51-55.
27. Borman, W. C. (1991). Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 2) (pp. 271-326). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
28. Rodgers, R., Hunter, J. E., & Rogers, D. L. (1993). Influence of top management commitment on management program success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 51-55.
29. Engelmann, C. H., & Roesch, R. C. (2001). Managing individual performance: An approach to designing and effective performance management system. Scottsdale, AZ: World at Work.
30. Mohrman, A. M., Jr., Resnick-West, S. M., Lawler, E. E. III (1989). Designing performance appraisal systems: Aligning appraisals and organizational realities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Hillgren, J. S., & Cheatham, D. W. (2000). Understanding performance measures: An approach to linking rewards to the achievement of organizational objectives. Scottsdale, AZ: World at Work.
32. Wexley, K. N. (1986). Appraisal interview. In R. A. Berk (ed.), Performance assessment. (pp. 167-185). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Cederblom, D. (1982). The performance appraisal interview: A review, implications, and suggestions. Academy of Management Review, 7, 219-227.
34. Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615-633.
35. Wexley, K. N. (1986). Appraisal interview. In R. A. Berk (ed.), Performance assessment. (pp. 167-185). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36. Cederblom, D. (1982). The performance appraisal interview: A review, implications, and suggestions. Academy of Management Review, 7, 219-227.
37. Hough, L. M., Keyes, M. A., & Dunnette, M. D. (1983). An evaluation of three "alternative" selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 36, 261-276.
38. Gilliland, S. W., & Langdon, J. C. (1998). Creating performance management systems that promote perceptions of fairness. In James W. Smither (ed.) Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. Borman, W. C. (1991). Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 2) (pp. 271-326). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
40. Wexley, K. N. (1986). Appraisal interview. In R. A. Berk (ed.), Performance assessment. (pp. 167-185). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41. Dorsey, D. W. (2002). Information technology. In J. W. Hedge & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), Implementing organizational interventions (pp. 110-132). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Summers, L. (2001). Web technologies for administering multisource feedback programs. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, & A. H. Church (Eds.), The handbook of multisource feedback (pp. 165-180). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Pulakos, E. D. (2004). Performance management: A roadmap for developing, implementing, and evaluating performance management systems. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resources Management.
44. Malos, S. (2005). The importance of valid selection and performance appraisal: Do management practices figure in case law? In F. J. Landy (Ed.), Employment discrimination litigation (pp. 373-409). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. EOCC (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal register, 43, 38295-38315.
46. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
48. Borman, W. C. (1991). Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 2) (pp. 271-326). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
49. Jamieson, B. D. (1973). Behavioral problems with management by objective. Academy of Management Review, 16, 496-505.
50. Strauss, G. (1972). Management by objectives: A critical review. Training and Development Journal, 26, 10-15.
51. Muczyk, J. P. (1979). Dynamics and hazards of MBO application. Personnel Administrator, 24, 51-61.
52. Cascio, W. F. (1998). Applied psychology in human resource management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
53. Levinson, H. (2005). Management by whose objectives? In Harvard Business Review on appraising employee performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
54. Spencer, L., & Spencer, S. (1994). Competence at work. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
55. Mumford, M. D., & Peterson, N. B. (1999). The O*NET content model: Structural considerations in describing jobs. In N. B. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 21-30). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
56. Schippmann, J. S. (1999). Strategic job modeling: Working at the core of integrated human resource systems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.