MoHTAM: A technology acceptance model for mobile health applications

Proceedings - 4th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering, DeSE 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 13-18

  Mohamed, Abdul Hakim H M ^a   Tawfik, Hissam ^a   Al Jumeily, Dhiya ^b   Norton, Lin ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL HOPE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health informatics; Perceived usefulness; Smart mobile phones; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA PRESENTATION; DEPENDENT FACTORS; HEALTH INFORMATICS; M-HEALTH SERVICES; MEDICAL DOMAINS; MEDICAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MHEALTH; MOBILE HEALTH; MOBILE HEALTH APPLICATION; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TECHNOLOGY DESIGNS; USERS' PERCEPTION;

DESIGN; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MOBILE DEVICES; SMARTPHONES;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84858053285     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/DeSE.2011.79     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Mohamed, Abdul Hakim H. M.; Tawfik, Hissam; Norton, Lin; Al- Jumeily, Dhiya. (2011), "e-HTAM: A Technology Acceptance Model for electronic health, " Innovations in Information Technology (IIT), 2011 International Conference on, vol., no., pp.134-138, 25-27.
2. Davis, F.D. and Venkatesh, V. (2004). "Toward Preprototype User Acceptance Testing of New Information Systems: Implications for Software Project Management". IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51 (1).
3. Dawes, John (2008). "Do Data Characteristics Change According to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7- point and 10-point scales". International Journal of Market Research 50 (1): pp. 61-77.
4. Gliem, J. and Gliem, R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. In 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education. Columbus, OH.
5. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows third edition. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
6. T. Laakko, and T. Hiltunen, (2005) "Adapting Web content to mobile user agents", Internet Computing, IEEE, Volume 9, Issue 2, March-April, pp 46 - 53. (Pubitemid 40556044)
7. Chuttur M.Y. (2009). "Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions", Indiana University, USA.
8. Peker, C. (2010) An Analysis of The Main Critical Factors that affect the acceptance of Technology In Hospital Management systems, The Middle East Technical University.
9. Mathieson K., Peacock, E. Chin, W. (2001) Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources, ACM SIGMIS Database, v.32.
10. Acton, T., Golden, W., van der Heijden, H. (2005). "Effects of seethrough interfaces on user Acceptance of small-screen information systems." ECIS.
11. Davis, F.D. (1989). "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology". MIS Quarterly, 13 (3).
12. Haslina, M. and Sharifah, S. (2006). "Electronic Medical Record Evaluation Using Task Analysis Technique, " presented at Proceedings of the 11 the International Symposium on Health Information Management Research, iSHIMR 2006, USM, Kelantan, Malaysia, 2006.
13. Fisher, B. Fitton, R. Poirier, C. and Stables, D. (2007). " Patient access to electronic medical record and automatic, " The British Journal of General Practice, vol. 57, pp. 507.
14. Health Information Exchanges and Your EMR Selection Process, " New England Journal of Medicine, January 25, 2011.
15. EHR Definition, Attributes and Essential Requirements" (PDF). Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. 2003. http://www.himss.org/content/files/EHRAttributes.pdf. Retrieved 2006-07-28.
16. Meinert, D.B. (2006). "Resistance to Electronic Medical Records (EMRs): A Barrier to Improved Quality of Care" (PDF). Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology. http://proceedings.informingscience.org/ InSITE2005/I41f100Mein.pdf.
17. Hofstede, G (1980), "Culture's Consequences; International Differences in work related values", Sage, Beverly Hills.
18. Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organizations across Nations, 2nd Ed., Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA.
19. Wilkins M. A. (2009) Factors Influencing Acceptance of Electronic Health Records in Hospitals. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2009; 6(Fall): 1f. Published online 2009 September 16.