e-HTAM: A technology acceptance model for electronic health

2011 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, IIT 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 134-138

  Mohamed, Abdul Hakim H M ^a   Tawfik, Hissam ^a   Norton, Lin ^a   Al Jumeily, Dhiya ^b  

^a LIVERPOOL HOPE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

health technology acceptance model; perceived ease of use; perceived usefulness; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

E-HEALTH SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; SOCIOCULTURAL FACTORS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TECHNOLOGY DESIGNS;

HEALTH; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

INNOVATION;

EID: 79960001033     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2011.5893804     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Chuttur M.Y. (2009). "Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions", Indiana University, USA.
2. Davis, F.D. (1989). "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology". MIS Quarterly, 13 (3).
3. Davis, F.D. (1993). "User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts". International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38.
4. Davis, F.D. and Venkatesh, V. (2004). "Toward Preprototype User Acceptance Testing of New Information Systems: Implications for Software Project Management". IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51 (1).
5. Davis F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). "User Acceptance of Computer Technology. A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models". Management Science, 35 (8).
6. G.S. Hubona and A. Burton-Jones, (2006), The mediation of external constructs in the technology acceptance model, Information & Management 43 (6) (2006), pp. 706-717.
7. S. Khushman, A. Todman, S. Amin (2009). "The Relationship between Culture and E-business Acceptance in Arab Countries," DeSE2009, pp.454-459, IEEE Computer Society, The Second International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering, Abu Dhabi.
8. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies". Management Science, 46 (2).
9. Dawes, John (2008). "Do Data Characteristics Change According to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales". International Journal of Market Research 50 (1): pp. 61-77.
10. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. (1997), Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of e-mail: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. MIS Quarterly, Vol.21.No.4, pp. 389-400.
11. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W., (2003), Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model, MIS Quarterly, Vol.27 No.1, pp. 51-90.
12. Hofstede, G (1980), "Culture's Consequences; International Differences in work related values", Sage, Beverly Hills.
13. Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organizations across Nations, 2nd Ed., Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA.
14. Kong, W.C., Hung, Y.T. (2006), "Modeling Initial and Repeat Online Trust in B2C E Commerce", Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI .
15. Laroche M., Bergeron J. and Goutaland C. (2001), A Three-Dimensional Scale of the Intangibility, Journal of Service Research, Vol.4, No.1, pp. 26-38.
16. Schumacker, R. E. and Lomax R. G. (2004) A Beginner's Guide To Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd Ed, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Venkatesh, V. and Davis F. D. (2000). "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies", Management Science, Vol. 46. No. 2, pp. 186-204.
18. Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M. G. (2000) "Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior," MIS Quarterly Vol. 24.No.1, pp. 115-139.
19. Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M.G., Davis, G., and Davis, F. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, pp. 425-478.
20. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows third edition. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
21. Glasgow, R. E. (2007). eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. Am J Prev Med, 32(5 Suppl), S119-126.
22. Hossain, L. and DE Silva, A. (2009) Exploring user acceptance of technology using social networks. Journal of High Technology Management Research 20(1), 1.
23. Pan American Health Organization (1999), Setting up Healthcare Services Information Systems: A Guide for Requirement Analysis, Application Specification, and Procurement. Essential Drugs and Technology Program, Division of Health Systems and Services Development, PAHO/WHO, Washington, DC.
24. Oh, H., Rizo, C., Enkin, M., Jadad, A. (2005), "What is e-health? A systematic review of published definitions", Journal of Medical Internet Research, (published online February 24, 2005), Vol. 24.
25. Park, N., Lee, K. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2007). User acceptance of elearning in higher education: An application of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1), article 9.
26. Peker, C. (2010) An Analysis of The Main Critical Factors that affect the acceptance of Technology In Hospital Management systems, The Middle East Technical University.
27. Hair, JF, Bush, RP and Ortinau, DJ, (2003) Marketing Research: Within A Changing Information Environment, 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
28. Corder, G.W., Foreman, D.I. (2009).Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-by-Step Approach Wiley.
29. Gliem, J. and Gliem, R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. In 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education. Columbus, OH.