Effects of see-through interfaces on user acceptance of small-screen information systems

Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, Information Systems in a Rapidly Changing Economy, ECIS 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Acton, Thomas ^a   Golden, William ^b   Van Der Heijden, Hans ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ease of use; Mobile phone; Small screen displays; Translucent interface

Indexed keywords

EASE-OF-USE; EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE; LARGE-SCREEN DISPLAY; ON-SCREEN MENU; SCREEN SPACE; SMALL SCREENS; SMALL-SCREEN DEVICES; SYSTEM DESIGNERS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; THIRD GENERATION MOBILE PHONES; USER ACCEPTANCE;

CELLULAR TELEPHONES; MOBILE PHONES; USER INTERFACES;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870998570     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R. and Todd, P. A. (1992) Perceived Usefulness, Ease Of Use, And Usage Of Information Technology: A Replication, MIS Quarterly, 16 (2), pp. 227-248.
2. Atkinson, M. A. and Kydd, C. (1997) Individual Characteristics Associated With World Wide Web Use: An Empirical Study Of Playfulness And Motivation, Database for advances in information systems, 28 (2), pp. 53-62.
3. Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Pier, K., Buxton, W. and DeRose, T. D. (1993) Toolglass And Magic Lenses: The See-Through Interface, Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics, August 2-6, 1993, Anaheim, CA USA, August 2-6, 1993, Anaheim, CA USA, pp. 73-80.
4. Cheung, W., Chang, M. K. and Lai, V. S. (2000) Prediction of Internet and World Wide Web usage at work: a test of an extended Triandis model, Decision Support Systems, 30 (1), pp. 83-100.
5. Davis, F.D. (1986) A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results, Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
6. Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, September, pp. 318-340.
7. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989) User Acceptance Of Computer Technology: A Comparison Of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 35 (8), pp. 982-1003.
8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1992) Extrinsic And Intrinsic Motivation To Use Computers In The Workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22 (14), pp. 1111-1132.
9. Encarnacäo, L. M., Bimber, O., Schmalstieg, D. and Chandler, S. D. (1999) A Translucent Sketchpad for the Virtual Table Exploring Motion-based Gesture Recognition, Computer Graphics Forum, 18 (3), pp. 277-287.
10. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading.
11. Genau, A. and Kramer, A. (1995) Translucent History, Conference Companion On Human Factors In Computing Systems, ACM Press, Denver, Colorado, United States, pp. 250-251.
12. Harrison, B. L., Ishii, H., Vicente, K. J. and Buxton, W. A. S. (1995b) Transparent Layered User Interfaces: An Evaluation Of A Display Design To Enhance Focused And Divided Attention, Conference proceedings on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, Denver, Colorado, United States, pp. 317-324.
13. Harrison, B.L., Kurtenbach, G. and Vicente, K. J. (1995) An Experimental Evaluation Of Transparent User Interface Tools And Information Content, Proceedings of the 8th ACM symposium on User interface and software technology, November 15-17, 1995, Pittsburgh, PA USA.
14. Harrison, B. L. and Vicente, K. J. (1996) An experimental evaluation of transparent menu usage, Conference proceedings on Human factors in computing systemsACM Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 391-398.
15. Hassenzahl, M. and Wessler, R. (2000) Capturing Design Space From A User Perspective: The Repertory Grid Technique Revisited, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12 (3-4), pp. 441-459.
16. Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W.-M. and Tam, K.-Y. (2001) Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (3), pp. 97-125.
17. Igbaria, M. and Guimaraes, T. (1995) Testing The Determinants Of Microcomputer Usage Via A Structural Equation Model, Journal of Management Information Systems, 11 (4), pp. 87-115.
18. Igbaria, M., IIvari, J. and Maragahh, H. (1995b) Why Do Individuals Use Computer Technology? A Finnish Case Study, Information and Management, 29 227-238.
19. Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S. and Baroudi, J.J. (1996) A motivational model of microcomputer usage, Journal of Management Information Systems, 13 (1), pp. 127-143.
20. Kamba, T., Elson, S. A., Harpold, T., Stamper, T. and Sukaviriya, P. N. (1996) Using Small Screen Space More Efficiently, Conference proceedings on Human factors in computing systemsACM Press, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 383-390.
21. Kramer, A. (1994) Translucent Patches-Dissolving Windows, Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM Press, Marina del Rey, California, United States, pp. 121-130.
22. Leung, Y. K. and Apperley, M. D. (1994) A Review And Taxonomy Of Distortion-Oriented Presentation Techniques, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1 (2), pp. 126-160.
23. Mathieson, K. and Keil, M. (1998) Beyond The Interface: Ease Of Use And Task/Technology Fit, Information & Management, 34 (4), pp. 221-230.
24. Moon, J.-W. and Kim, Y.-G. (2001) Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context, Information & Management, 38 (4), pp. 217-230.
25. Subramanian, G. H. (1994) A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement, Decision Sciences, 25 (5/6), pp. 863-874.
26. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995) Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience, MIS Quarterly, 19 (4), pp. 561-661.
27. Teo, T., Lim, V. and Lai, R., (1999) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage, International Journal of Management Science (27), pp. 25-37.
28. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. and Ikar, D. (2000) What Is Beautiful Is Usable, Interacting with Computers, 13 (2), pp. 127-145.
29. Van der Heijden, H., Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands, Information & Management, (2003) vol 40, Issue 6, pp. 541-549
30. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 46 (2), pp. 186-205.
31. Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M. (2000) Why Don't Men Ever Stop To Ask For Directions? Gender, Social Influence, And Their Role In Technology Acceptance And Usage Behavior, MIS Quarterly, 24 (1), pp. 115-140.
32. Zhai, S., Buxton, W. and Milgram, P. (1994) The Silk Cursor": Investigating Transparency For 3D Target Acquisition, Conference proceedings on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence", ACM Press, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, pp. 459-464.