Bringing humans into the loop: Localization with machine translation at Traslán

AMTA 2008 - 8th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Groves, Declan ^a  

^a Traslán Co   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL SETTINGS; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; MACHINE TRANSLATION SYSTEMS; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS;

TURNAROUND TIME;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 84858037250     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Allen, J. (2004). Case Study: Implementing MT for the Translation of Pre-sales Marketing and Post-sales Software Deployment Documentation at Mycom International. In Machine Translation: From Real Users to Research. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
2. Armstrong, S., Flanagan, M., Graham, Y., Groves, D., Mellebeek, B., Morrissey, S., et al. (2006). MaTrEx: Machine Translation Using Examples. In TC-Star Open-Lab on Speech Translation. Trento, Italy. (http://www.computing. dcu.ie/~away/PUBS/2006/Matrex.pdf)
3. DePalma, D. A. (2006). Evaluating MT prior to deployment. In 7th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, "Visions for the Future of Machine Translation". Cambridge, Massachusetts. (presentation on user track)
4. Flournoy, R., & Callison-Burch, C. (2001). Secondary Benefits of Feedback and User Interaction in Machine Translation Tools. Workshop paper for MT2010: Towards a Roadmap for MT of the MT Summit VIII.
5. Groves, D. (2007). Hybrid Data-Driven Models of Machine Translation. PhD Thesis, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
6. Groves, D., & Way, A. (2005). Hybrid Example-Based SMT: the Best of Both Worlds? In Proceedings of the ACL 2005 Workshop on Building and Using Parallel Texts: Data-Driven Machine Translation and Beyond (pp. 183-190). Ann Arbor, MI..
7. Groves, D., &Way, A. (2006a). Hybrid Data-Driven Models of MT. In Machine Translation, Special Issue on EBMT (Vol. 19, pp. 301-323).
8. Groves, D., & Way, A. (2006b). Hybridity in MT: Experiments on the Europarl Corpus. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (pp. 115-124). Oslo, Norway.
9. Hutchins, W. (2001). Machine translation and human translation: in competition or in complementation. International Journal of Translation, 13(1-2), 5-20.
10. Koehn, P., Hoang, H., Birch, A., Callison-Burch, C., Federico, M., Bertoldi, N., et al. (2007). Moses: Open source toolkit for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Companion Volume Proceedings of the Demo and Poster Sessions (pp. 177-180). Prague, Cz. Rep..
11. Lita, L., Ittycheriah, A., Roukos, S., & Kambhatla, N. (2003). tRuEcasIng. In 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-03) (pp. 152-159). Sapporo, Japan.
12. Nirenburg, S., Domashnev, C., & Grannes, D. J. (1993). Two Approaches to Matching in Example-Based Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation TMI '93: MT in the Next Generation (pp. 47-57). Kyoto, Japan.
13. O'Brien, S. (2006). Machine Translatability and Post-Editing Effort: An Empirical Study Using Translog and Choice Network Analysis. PhD Thesis, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
14. Och, F. (2003). Minimum Error Rate Training in Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-03) (pp. 160-167).Sapporo, Japan.
15. Ørsnes, B., Music, B., & Maegaard, B. (1996). PaTrans: A Patent Translation System. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96) - Volume 2 (pp. 1115-1118). Morristown, NJ.
16. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., & Zhu, W.-J. (2002). BLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-02) (pp. 311-318). Philadelphia, PA.
17. Ryan, J. P. (1988). The Role of the Translator in Making an MT System Work: Perspective of a Developer. In M. Vasconcellos (Ed.), Technology as Translation Strategy, American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, Vol. II (pp. 127-132). State University of New York at Binghamton (SUNY).
18. Senez, D. (1998). Post-Editing Service for Machine Translation Users at the European Commission. In Translating and the Computer 20. London: Aslib. (no page numbers)
19. Steinberger, R., Pouliquen, B., Widiger, A., Ignat, C., Erjavec, T., Tufiş, D., et al. (2006). The JRC-Acquis: A multilingual aligned parallel corpus with 20+ languages. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'2006) (pp. 2142-2147). Genoa, Italy.
20. Turian, J., Shen, L., & Melamed, I. D. (2003). Evaluation of Machine Translation and its Evaluation. In Machine Translation Summit IX (pp. 386-393).New Orleans, LA.
21. Valderrábanos, A. S., Esteban, J., & Iraola, L. (2003). TransType2 - A New Paradigm for Translation Automation. In Machine Translation Summit IX (pp. 23-27). New Orleans, LA.
22. van deer Meer, J. (2006). The Emergence of FAUT: Fully Automatic Useful Translation. In Keynote at the 11th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation. Oslo, Norway.
23. Vasconcellos, M. (1985). Management of the Machine Translation Environment: Interaction of Functions at the Pan American Health Organization. In V. Lawson (Ed.), Tools for the Trade, Translating and the Computer 5 (pp. 115-129). London: Aslib.
24. Way, A. (2003). Translating With Examples: the LFG-DOT Models of Translation. In M. Carl & A. Way (Eds.), Recent Advances in Example-Based Machine Translation (p. 443-472). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.