Hybridity in MT: Experiments on the europarl corpus

EAMT-2006 - 11th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 115-124

  Groves, Declan ^a   Way, Andy ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASELINE SYSTEMS; LARGE DATASETS; POSITIVE EFFECTS; SMT SYSTEMS; SYSTEM VARIANTS; TARGET LANGUAGE; TEST SETS; TRANSLATION MODELS; TRANSLATION QUALITY;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; EUROPIUM; HYBRID SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 77956566314     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Aramaki, E., Kurohashi, S., Kashioka, H., & Kato, N. (2005). Probabilistic Model for Example-Based Machine Translation. In Machine Translation Summit X (pp. 219-226). Phuket, Thailand.
2. Aue, A., Menezes, A., Moore, R., Quirk, C., & Ringger, E. (2004). Statistical Machine Translation Using Labeled Semantic Dependency Graphs. In Proceedings of TMI-04 (pp. 125-134). Baltimore, MD.
3. Bangalore, S., Murdock, V., & Riccardi, G. (2002). Boostrapping Bilinugal Data using Consensus Translation for a Multilingual Instant Messaging System. In COLING 2002 (pp. 1-7). Taipei, Taiwan.
4. Brown, P., Cocke, J., Pietra, S. D., Pietra, V. D., Jelinek, F., Mercer, R., & Roossin, P. (1990). A Statistical Approach to Machine Translation. Computational Linguistics, 16, 79-85.
5. Brown, P., Pietra, S. D., Pietra, V. D., & Mercer, R. (1993). The Mathematics of Statistical Machine Translation: Parameter Estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19(2), 263-311.
6. Brown, R. (1999). Adding Linguistic Knowledge to a Lexical Example-based Translation System. In Proceedings of TMI-99 (pp. 22-32). Chester, England.
7. Carl, M., & Hansen, S. (1999). Linking Translation Memories with Example-Based Machine Translation. In Machine Translation Summit VII (pp. 617-624). Singapore.
8. Germann, U., Jahr, M., Knight, K., Marcu, D., & Yamada, K. (2001). Fast Decoding and Optimal Decoding for Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 39th ACL and 10th Conference of the European Chapter (pp. 228-235). Toulouse, France.
9. Gough, N. (2005). Example-Based Machine Translation Using the Marker Hypothesis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
10. Green, T. (1979). The Necessity of Syntax Markers. Two experiments with artificial languages. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 18, 481-496.
11. Groves, D., & Way, A. (2005). Hybrid Example-Based SMT: the Best of Both Worlds? In Proceedings of the ACL 2005 Workshop on Building and Using Parallel Texts: Data-Driven Machine Translation and Beyond (pp. 183-190). Ann Arbor, MI.
12. Hearne, M., & Way, A. (2003). Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Data-Oriented Translation. In Machine Translation Summit IX (pp. 165-172). New Orleans, LA.
13. Koehn, P. (2004). Pharaoh: A Beam Search Decoder for Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation Models. In R. Frederking & K. Taylor (Eds.), Machine Translation: From Real Users to Research; AMTA 2004, LNAI 3265 (pp. 115-124). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
14. Koehn, P. (2005). Europarl: A Parallel Corpus for Statistical Machine Translation. In Machine Translation Summit X (pp. 79-86). Phuket, Thailand.
15. Koehn, P., Och, F., & Marcu, D. (2003). Statistical Phrase-Based Translation. In Human Language Technology Conference (HLT-NAACL) (pp. 48-54). Edmonton, Canada.
16. Langlais, P., & Simard, M. (2002). Merging Example-Based and Statistical Machine Translation. In S. Richardson (Ed.), (pp. 104-113). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
17. Marcu, D. (2001). Towards a Unified Approach to Memory- and Statistical-Based Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 39th ACL and 10th Conference of the European Chapter (pp. 378-385). Toulouse, France.
18. Nagao, M. (1984). A Framework of a Mechanical Translation between Japanese and English by Analogy Principle. In A. Elithorn & R. Banerji (Eds.), (pp. 173-180). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
19. stACL (pp. 160-167). Sapporo, Japan.
20. Och, F., & Ney, H. (2003). A Systematic Comparison of Various Statistical Alignment Models. Computational Linguistics, 29, 19-51.
21. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., & Zhu, W.-J. (2002). BLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 40th acl) (pp. 311-318). Philadelphia, PA.
22. Planas, E., & Furuse, O. (2003). Formalizing Translation Memory. In M. Carl & A. Way (Eds.), Recent Advances in Example-Based Machine Translation (pp. 157-188). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23. Turian, J., Shen, L., & Melamed, I. D. (2003). Evaluation of Machine Translation and its Evaluation. In Machine Translation Summit IX (pp. 386-393). New Orleans, LA.
24. Vogel, S., & Ney, H. (2000). Construction of a Hierarchical Translation Memory. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: COLING 2000 in Europe (pp. 1131-1135). Saarbrücken, Germany.
25. Watanabe, H., Kurohashi, S., & Aramaki, E. (2003). Finding translation patterns from paired source and target dependency structures. In M. Carl & A. Way (Eds.), Recent Advances in Example-Based Machine Translation (pp. 397-420). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Way, A., & Gough, N. (2005). Comparing Example-Based and Statistical Machine Translation. Natural Language Engineering, 11(3), 295-309.