Validation of a microsimulation of the Port of Dover

Journal of Computational Science

Volumn 3, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 56-66

  Roadknight, Chris ^a   Aickelin, Uwe ^a   Sherman, Galina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agents; Operations research; Simulation; Transport

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS; MICROSIMULATION; ROBUST PLANNING; SIMULATION; SIMULATION STRATEGIES; SYSTEM STATISTICS; TRANSPORT;

AGENTS; LIGHT WEIGHT VEHICLES; OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

PORTS AND HARBORS;

EID: 84858008755     PISSN: 18777503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2011.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Charypar D., Axhausen K.W., Nagel K. An event-driven parallel queue-based microsimulation for large scale traffic scenarios. Paper presented at the 11th World Conference on Transportation Research 2007.
2. Ting L., Heck E., Vervest P., Voskuilen J., Hofker F., Jansma F. Passenger travel behavior model in railway network simulation. Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference 2006, 1380-1387. (IEEE catalog number 06CH37826). L.F. Perrone, F.P. Wieland, J. Liu, B.G. Lawson (Eds.).
3. Fellendorf M., Vortisch P. Validation of the microscopic traffic flow model VISSIM in different real-world situations. 80th Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2001.
4. http://www.doverport.co.uk/%3Fpage=PortDevelopment.
5. Bluetooth SIG Specification of the Bluetooth System 2003, http://www.bluetooth.com/.
6. Nam D., Drew D. Automatic measurement of traffic variables for intelligent transportation systems applications. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 1999, 33(August (6)):437-457. 0191-2615.
7. Davidsson P., Henesey L., Ramstedt L., Tornquist J., Wernstedt F. An analysis of agent based approaches to transport logistics. Transport. Res.: Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2005, 13(4):255-271.
8. Hawkins D.M. The problem of overfitting. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44:1-12.
9. Cawley G.C., Talbot N.L.C. On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010, 11:2079-2107.
10. Smith L., Beckman R., Anson D., Nagel K., Williams M.E. Transims: transportation analysis and simulation system. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Transportation Planning Methods 1995.
11. Cameron G. Paramics: parallel microscopic simulation of road traffic. J. SuperComput. 1996.
12. Prevedouros P.D., Wang Y. Simulation of a large freeway/arterial network with integration, tsis/corsim and watsim. Transport. Res. Rec. 1999, 1678:197-207.
13. I.T.Concepts Vissim Simulation Tool 2001, http://www.itc-world.com/VISSIMinfo.htm.
14. Sargent R.G. Verifying and validating simulation models. 1996 Winter Simulation Conference 1996, 55-64.
15. O. Rose, Why do simple wafer fab models fail in certain scenarios?, Proc. 2000 Winter Simulation Conf., 2000, pp. 1481-1490.
16. Tetko I.V., Livingstone D.J., Luik A.I. Neural network studies. 1. Comparison of overfitting and overtraining. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35:826-833.
17. Goldberg D.E., Deb K. A comparative analysis of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 1991, 69-93. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA. G.J.E. Rawlins (Ed.).
18. Robinson S. Simulation - The Practice of Model Development and Use 2004, Wiley.
19. Southern J., Gorman G.J., Piggott M.D., Farrell P.E., Bernabeu M.O., Pitt-Francis J. Simulating cardiac electrophysiology using anisotropic mesh adaptivity. J. Comput. Sci. 2010, 1(June (2)):82-88.
20. Balcan D., Goncalves B., Hu H., Ramasco J., Colizza V., Vespignani A. Modeling the spatial spread of infectious diseases: the global epidemic and mobility computational model. J. Comput. Sci. 2010, 1(August (3)):132-145.
21. Nevins M.R., Macal C.M., Love R.J., Bragen R.J. Simulation, animation and visualization of seaport operations. Simulation 1998, 71:96-106.