Cycles of electronic health records adaptation by physicians: How do the positive and negative experiences with the EHR system affect physicians' EHR adaptation process?

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 2685-2695

  Noteboom, Cherie ^a   Bastola, Dhundy ^b   Qureshi, Sajda ^b  

^a DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

ADAPTATION PROCESS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; IT INFRASTRUCTURES; NEGATIVE EXPERIENCES; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DATA; QUALITATIVE DATA; REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE;

HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 84857946918     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.191     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Ash, J. S. (1997). Factors affecting the diffusion of the computer-based patient record. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Supplement, AMIA Proceedings, 682-686.
2. Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organizational Science, 3(1), 1-19.
3. Barrows, R. C., & Clayton, P. D. (1996). Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 3(2), 139-148.
4. Baskerville, R. & Myers, D. (2004). Special issue on action research in information systems: Making IS relevant to practice. MIS Quarterly, 28(3), 329-335.
5. Bates, D. W., Boyle, D. L., & Teich, J. M. (1994). Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time. Proceedings/AMIA Annual Symposium, 996.
6. Blumenthal, D. (2009). Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology, The New England Journal of Medicine, 360(15), pp. 1477-1479.
7. Burt, C. W., & Sisk, J. E. (2005). Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records? Survey data show limited use of these information tools. Health Affairs, 24, 1334-1343.
8. Cutler, D. M., Feldman, N. E., & Horwitz, J. R. (2005). U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry systems. Health Affairs, 24, 1654-1663.
9. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
10. Eisenhart, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 532-559.
11. Fichman, R., & Kemerer, C. (1997). The assimilation of software process innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Science, 43(10), 1345-1363.
12. Fontaine, P. Ross, S.E., Zink, T. Schilling, L.M. 2010. "Systematic Review of Health Information Exchange in Primary Care Practices", J Am Board Fam Med (23), pp. 655- 670
13. Galliers, R. D., & Land, F. F. (1987). Choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 30(11), 900-903.
14. Gans, D., Kralewski, J., Hammons, T., & Dowd, B. (2005). Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems: Practices are encountering greater-than-expected barriers to adopting an EHR system, but the adoption rate continues to rise. Health Affairs, 24, 1323-1333.
15. Gersick, C. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
16. Ginneken, A. M. (2002). The computerized patient record: Balancing effort and benefit. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 65, 97-119.
17. Greenhalgh, T., Potts, H.W.W., Wong, G., Bark, P., and Swinglehurst, D. 2009. "Tensions and Paradoxes in Electronic Patient Record Research: A Systematic Literature Review Using the Metanarrative Method," Milbank Quarterly (87:4), pp. 729-788.
18. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Health Care in America (IOM). (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. Johnson, D. L., Pan, E., Walker, J., Bates, D., & Middleton, B. (2004). Patient safety in the physician's office: Assessing the value of ambulatory CPOE. Retrieved April 14, 2007, from http://www.chcf.org/documents/ ihealth/PatientSafetyInPhysiciansOfficeACPOE.pdf
20. Johnson, K. B., & Davison, C. L. (2004). Information technology: Its importance to child safety. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 4, 64-72.
21. Kaplan, B., & Duchon, D. (1988). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: A case study. MIS Quarterly, 2(4), 570-586.
22. Khoury, A. T. (1998). Support of quality and business goals by an ambulatory automated medical record system in Kaiser Permanente of Ohio. Effective Clinical Practice, 1, 73-82.
23. Kidder, T. (1982). Soul of a new machine. New York: Avon.
24. Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive filed studies in information systems [Special Issue on Intensive Research]. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-93.
25. Kohn, L., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Lafkey, D. B. (2004). Delivering on the promise of electronic medical records: Opportunities, constraints, and developments. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from http://wfs.cgu.edu/lafkyd/Background-Paper.pdf
27. Manos, D., (2009). New study shows few hospitals have comprehensive EHR. Healthcare IT News, March 25 2009
28. Markus, M., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598.
29. McDonald, C. J. (1997). The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(3), 213-221.
30. Miller, R. H., & Sim, I. (2004). Physicians' use of electronic medical records: Barriers and solutions. Health Affairs, 23(2), 116-126.
31. Miller, R. H., West, C., Brown, T. M., Sim, I., & Ganchoff, C. (2005). The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices: Physicians' EHR adoption is slowed by a reimbursement system that rewards the volume of services more than it does their quality. Health Affairs, 24, 1127-1137.
32. Niazkhani, Z., Pirnejad, H., Berg, M., and Aarts, J. 2009. "The Impact of Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems on Inpatient Clinical Workflow: A Literature Review," Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (16:4), pp. 539-549.
33. Noteboom, C. & Qureshi, S., "Physician interaction with electronic health records: The influences of digital natives and digital immigrants." In (eds) R. Sprague and J. Nunamaker, The Forty-fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press. 2011.
34. Pinfield, L. (1986). A field evaluation of perspectives on organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 365-388.
35. Poon, E., Blumenthal, D., Jaggi, T., Honour, M., Bates, D., & Kaushal, R. (2004). From the field: Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Affairs, 23(4), 184-190.
36. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. From on the Horizon, 9(5).
37. Qureshi, S., Liu, M., & Vogel, D. (2005). A grounded theory analysis of e-collaboration effects for distributed project management. In R. Sprague & J. Nunamaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, January 3-6, 2005 (pp. 1-10). Waikoloa, HI: IEEE Computer Society Press.
38. Qureshi, S., & Noteboom, C. (2006). Adaptation in distributed projects: Collaborative processes in digital natives and digital immigrants. In R. Sprague & J. Nunamaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty Ninth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, January, 4-7, 2006 (pp. 1-10). Kauia, HI: IEEE Computer Society Press.
39. Qureshi, S., & Vogel, D. (2000a). Adaptiveness in virtual teams (ERIM Report Series Ref. No. ERS-2000-20-LIS).
40. Qureshi, S., & Vogel, D. (2000b). Organizational adaptiveness in virtual teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(1), 27-46.
41. Schmitt, K., & Woffard, D. (2002). Financial analysis projects clear returns from electronic medical records. Healthcare Financial Management, January, 52-57.
42. Simon, H. (1997). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
43. Strauss, A. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review, 4(1), pp. 4-21.
44. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Sujansky, W. V. (1998). The benefits and challenges of an electronic medical record: Much more than a "word-processed" patient chart. Western Journal of Medicine, 169(3), 176-183.
47. Thrall, J. (2004). Quality and safety revolution in health care. Radiology, 233, 3-6.
48. Tonnesen, A. S., LeMaistre, A., & Tucker, D. (1999). Electronic medical record implementation barriers encountered during implementation. Proceeding to AMIA Symposium, 624-626.
49. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting information systems in organisations. London: Wiley.
50. Walsham, G. (1995a). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 64-81.
51. Vishwanath, A. & Scarmurra, T. (2007). Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model. Health Informatics Journal, 13(2), 119-134.