Physician interaction with electronic health records: The influences on digital natives and digital immigrants

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Noteboom, Cherie ^a   Qureshi, Sajda ^b  

^a DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL NATIVES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; IT INFRASTRUCTURES; PATIENT DATA; QUALITATIVE DATA; REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE;

HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; RECORDS MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE;

EID: 79952949706     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.342     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (64)

1. Anderson, J. (1997). Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(8), 83-90.
2. Anderson, J. & Aydin, C. (1997). Evaluating the impact of health care information systems. International Journal Technical Assessment in Healthcare, 13(2), 380-393. (Pubitemid 27214837)
3. Ash, J. S. (1997). Factors affecting the diffusion of the computer-based patient record. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Supplement, AMIA Proceedings, 682-686.
4. Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organizational Science, 3(1), 1-19.
5. Barrows, R. C., & Clayton, P. D. (1996). Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 3(2), 139-148.
6. Baskerville, R. & Myers, D. (2004). Special issue on action research in information systems: Making IS relevant to practice. MIS Quarterly, 28(3), 329-335.
7. Bates, D. W., Boyle, D. L., & Teich, J. M. (1994). Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time. Proceedings/AMIA Annual Symposium, 996.
8. Bates, D. W., Ebell, M., Gotlieb, E., Zapp, J., & Mullins, H. C. (2003). A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10, 1-10. (Pubitemid 36134057)
9. Bates, D. W., Leape, L. L., Cullen, D. J., Laird, N., Petersen, L. S., Teich, J. M., et al. (1999). Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA, 280, 1311-1316.
10. Beaudry, A. & Pinsonneault, A. (2005). Understanding user responses to information technology; A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 493-524.
11. Blumenthal, D. (2002). Doctors in a wired world: Can professionalism survive connectivity. The Milbank Quarterly 80(3), 525-546.
12. Blumenthal, D. (2009). Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology, The New England Journal of Medicine, 360(15), pp. 1477-1479.
13. Burt, C. W., & Sisk, J. E. (2005). Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records? Survey data show limited use of these information tools. Health Affairs, 24, 1334-1343.
14. Cutler, D. M., Feldman, N. E., & Horwitz, J. R. (2005). U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry systems. Health Affairs, 24, 1654-1663.
15. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
16. Davis, G. B., & Parker, C. A. (1997). Writing the doctoral dissertation: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). Woodbury, NY: Barron's Educational Series.
17. Eisenhart, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 532-559.
18. Fichman, R. G. (1992). Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research. In J. I. DeGross, J. D. Becker, & J. J. Elam (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 195-206). Dallas, TX: supply publisher.
19. Fichman, R., & Kemerer, C. (1997). The assimilation of software process innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Science, 43(10), 1345-1363. (Pubitemid 127575311)
20. Friedman, L., & Goes, J. (2001). Have integrated health networks failed? Frontiers of Health Service Management, 17(4), 3-27.
21. Galliers, R. D., & Land, F. F. (1987). Choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 30(11), 900-903.
22. Gans, D., Kralewski, J., Hammons, T., & Dowd, B. (2005). Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems: Practices are encountering greater-than-expected barriers to adopting an EHR system, but the adoption rate continues to rise. Health Affairs, 24, 1323-1333.
23. Gersick, C. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
24. Ginneken, A. M. (2002). The computerized patient record: Balancing effort and benefit. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 65, 97-119.
25. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Health Care in America (IOM). (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Johnson, D. L., Pan, E., Walker, J., Bates, D., & Middleton, B. (2004). Patient safety in the physician's office: Assessing the value of ambulatory CPOE. Retrieved April 14, 2007, from http://www.chcf.org/documents/ ihealth/PatientSafetyInPhysiciansOfficeACPOE.pdf
27. Johnson, K. B., & Davison, C. L. (2004). Information technology: Its importance to child safety. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 4, 64-72. (Pubitemid 38180875)
28. Kaplan, B., & Duchon, D. (1988). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: A case study. MIS Quarterly, 2(4), 570-586.
29. Kaplan, B., & Maxwell, J. A. (1994). Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. In J. G. Anderson, C. E. Aydin, & S. J. Jay (Eds.), Evaluating health care information systems: Methods and applications (pp. 45-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Khoury, A. T. (1998). Support of quality and business goals by an ambulatory automated medical record system in Kaiser Permanente of Ohio. Effective Clinical Practice, 1, 73-82.
31. Kidder, T. (1982). Soul of a new machine. New York: Avon.
32. Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive filed studies in information systems [Special Issue on Intensive Research]. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-93.
33. Kohli, R. & Kettinger, W. (2004). Informating the clan: Controlling physicians' costs and outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 28(3), 363-394.
34. Kohn, L., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Lafkey, D. B. (2004). Delivering on the promise of electronic medical records: Opportunities, constraints, and developments. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from http://wfs.cgu.edu/lafkyd/Background-Paper.pdf
36. Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Srivastava, R. K. (1990). Determination of adopter categories by using innovation diffusion models. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 37-50.
37. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R., Malhotra, A., & King, N. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 569-600.
38. Manos, D., (2009). New study shows few hospitals have comprehensive EHR. Healthcare IT News, March 25 2009
39. Markus, M., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598.
40. McDonald, C. J. (1997). The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(3), 213-221.
41. Miller, R. H., & Sim, I. (2004). Physicians' use of electronic medical records: Barriers and solutions. Health Affairs, 23(2), 116-126. (Pubitemid 38471048)
42. Miller, R. H., West, C., Brown, T. M., Sim, I., & Ganchoff, C. (2005). The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices: Physicians' EHR adoption is slowed by a reimbursement system that rewards the volume of services more than it does their quality. Health Affairs, 24, 1127-1137.
43. Ondo, K. J., Wagner, J., & Gale, K. L. (2002). The electronic medical record (EMR): Hype or reality? HIMSS Proceedings, 63, 1-12.
44. Pinfield, L. (1986). A field evaluation of perspectives on organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 365-388.
45. Poon, E., Blumenthal, D., Jaggi, T., Honour, M., Bates, D., & Kaushal, R. (2004). From the field: Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Affairs, 23(4), 184-190. (Pubitemid 38952397)
46. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. From on the Horizon, 9(5).
47. Qureshi, S., Liu, M., & Vogel, D. (2005). A grounded theory analysis of e-collaboration effects for distributed project management. In R. Sprague & J. Nunamaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, January 3-6, 2005 (pp. 1-10). Waikoloa, HI: IEEE Computer Society Press.
48. Qureshi, S., & Noteboom, C. (2006). Adaptation in distributed projects: Collaborative processes in digital natives and digital immigrants. In R. Sprague & J. Nunamaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty Ninth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, January, 4-7, 2006 (pp. 1-10). Kauia, HI: IEEE Computer Society Press.
49. Qureshi, S., & Vogel, D. (2000a). Adaptiveness in virtual teams (ERIM Report Series Ref. No. ERS-2000-20-LIS).
50. Qureshi, S., & Vogel, D. (2000b). Organizational adaptiveness in virtual teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(1), 27-46.
51. Schmitt, K., & Woffard, D. (2002). Financial analysis projects clear returns from electronic medical records. Healthcare Financial Management, January, 52-57.
52. Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Sidorov, J. (2005). It ain't necessarily so: The electronic health record and the unlikely prospect of reducing health care costs. Health Affairs, 25(4), 1079-1085.
54. Simon, H. (1997). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
55. Strauss, A. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review, 4(1), pp. 4-21.
56. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Sujansky, W. V. (1998). The benefits and challenges of an electronic medical record: Much more than a "word-processed" patient chart. Western Journal of Medicine, 169(3), 176-183.
59. Thrall, J. (2004). Quality and safety revolution in health care. Radiology, 233, 3-6.
60. Tonnesen, A. S., LeMaistre, A., & Tucker, D. (1999). Electronic medical record implementation barriers encountered during implementation. Proceeding to AMIA Symposium, 624-626.
61. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting information systems in organisations. London: Wiley.
62. Walsham, G. (1995a). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 64-81.
63. Walsham, G. (1995b). The emergence of interpretivision in IS research. Information Systems Research, 6(4), 376-394.
64. Vishwanath, A. & Scarmurra, T. (2007). Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model. Health Informatics Journal, 13(2), 119-134. (Pubitemid 46746096)