Why you should pay attention to stream mitigation banking

Ecological Restoration

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 287-289

  Lave, Rebecca ^a   Robertson, Morgan M ^b   Doyle, Martin W ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349101489     PISSN: 15434060     EISSN: 15434079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3368/er.26.4.287     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bernhardt, E.S., M.A. Palmer, J.D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr et al. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts. Science 308:636-637.
2. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). 2006. Ecosystem Enhancement Program 2005-2006 annual report. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. www.nceep.net/news/annualreport/2006/EEP_2005_2006_Annual_Report.pdf
3. Litteken, C. 2003. St. Louis District stream mitigation banks. Aquatic Resources News 2(2):10-12. www.usace.army.mil/cw/cecwo/reg/aqua/vol2-2.pdf
4. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR). 2001. Internal technical guide for stream work in North Carolina, version 3.0. h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/documents/streamgd-1.pdf
5. Robertson, M.M. 2006. The nature that capital can see: science, state and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24:367-387.
6. Ruhl, J.B. and J. Salzman. 2006. The effects of wetland mitigation banking on people. National Wetlands Newsletter 28(2):1.
7. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. Stream mitigation guidelines. www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/Mitigation/stream_mitigation.html