Long-term results of stapled haemorrhoidopexy in a prospective single centre study of 153 patients with 1-6years' follow-up

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 490-496

  Gerjy, R ^a,b   Derwinger, K ^c   Lindhoff Larson, A ^a,b   Nystrom P O ^d,e  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Regional Cancer Centre Southeast   (Sweden)

^c SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^e KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Haemorrhoidopexy; Haemorrhoids; Incontince

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANUS SURGERY; ARTICLE; DEFECATION URGENCY; DIVERTICULOSIS; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMORRHOID; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECTUM PROLAPSE; REOPERATION; STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY; STENOSIS; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URGE INCONTINENCE; URINE RETENTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROLAPSE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; SELF REPORT; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857930916     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02872.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gerjy R, Lindhoff-Larson A, Nystrom PO. Prolapse grade and symptoms of haemorrhoids are poorly correlated: result of a classification algorithm in 270 patients. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 694-700.
2. Longo A. (1998) Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, pp. 777-84. Bologna.
3. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 782-5.
4. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 779-81.
5. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1376-81.
6. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1049-53.
7. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, Gabrielli F, Canuti S. Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1033-7.
8. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M et al. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 64-8.
9. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1837-45.
10. Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 147-60.
11. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD005393.
12. Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P. Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 266-72.
13. Orrom W, Hayashi A, Rusnak C, Kelly J. Initial experience with stapled anoplasty in the operative management of prolapsing hemorrhoids and mucosal rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 2002; 183: 519-24.
14. Gerjy R, Derwinger K, Nystrom PO. Perianal local block for stapled anopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1914-21.
15. Gerjy R, Lindhoff-Larson A, Sjodahl R, Nystrom PO. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy performed under local perianal block versus general anaesthesia. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1344-51.
16. Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M et al. Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1846-51.
17. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW. Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 226-30.
18. Nystrom PO, Qvist N, Raahave D, Lindsey I, Mortensen N. Randomized clinical trial of symptom control after stapled anopexy or diathermy excision for haemorrhoid prolapse. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 167-76.
19. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 878-92.
20. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1297-305.
21. Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I et al. Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 204-12.