Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1297-1305

  Jayaraman, Shiva ^a   Colquhoun, Patrick H D ^a   Malthaner, Richard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hemorrhoid; Hemorrhoidectomy; Hemorrhoidopexy; Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids; Prolapse; Staple

Indexed keywords

ANAL STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FECAL URGENCY; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; HYGIENE; INCONTINENCE; META ANALYSIS; PAIN; PRURITUS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SKIN TAG; STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TISSUE INJURY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RECURRENCE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES; TIME FACTORS; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 34748877259     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-0308-4     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. JF Johanson 2002 Evidence based approach to the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease Evid Based Gastroenterol 3 26 31
2. TC Sardinha ML Corman 2002 Hemorrhoids Surg Clin North Am 82 1153 1167
3. LM Sutherland AK Burchard K Masuda 2002 A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy Arch Surg 137 1395 1406
4. A Polglase 1997 Haemorrhoids: a clinical update Med J Aust 167 85 88
5. HM MacRae RS McLeod 1995 Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: a meta-analysis Dis Colon Rectum 38 687 694
6. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna, Italy. Monduzzi Publishing Co., 1998;777-84
7. JM Correa-Rovelo O Tellez L Obregon 2002 Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 45 1367 1376
8. BJ Mehigan JR Monson JE Hartley 2000 Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial Lancet 355 782 785
9. M Rowsell M Bello DM Hemingway 2000 Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial Lancet 355 779 781
10. M Pescatori 2002 Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a word of caution Int J Colorectal Dis 17 362 363
11. MJ Cheetham NJ Mortensen P-O Nystrom 2000 Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 356 730 733
12. Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JP. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2. In: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2004
13. P Boccasanta PG Capretti M Venturi 2001 Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse Am J Surg 182 64 68
14. MJ Cheetham CR Cohen MA Kamm RK Phillips 2003 A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidecomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up Dis Colon Rectum 46 491 497
15. E Ganio F Altomare E Gabrielli 2001 Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 669 674
16. FH Hetzer N Demartines AE Handschin P-A Clavien 2002 Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy Arch Surg 137 337 340
17. M Kairaluoma K Nuorva I Kellokumpu 2003 Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 46 93 99
18. H Ortiz J Marzo P Armendariz 2002 Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidopexy Br J Surg 89 1376 1381
19. A Racalbuto I Aliotta G Corsaro R Lanteri A Di Cataldo A Licata 2004 Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial Int J Colorectal Dis 19 239 244
20. AJ Senagore M Singer H Abcarian 2004 A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results Dis Colon Rectum 47 1824 1836
21. R Shalaby A Desoky 2001 Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 1049 1053
22. EF Smyth RP Baker BJ Wilken JE Hartley TJ White JR Monson 2003 Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial Lancet 361 1437 1438
23. I Au-Yong M Rowsell DM Hemingway 2004 Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrohoidectomy; a three and a half year follow up Colorectal Dis 6 37 38
24. SR Brown K Ballan E Ho 2001 Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy Colorectal Dis 3 175 178
25. YH Ho WK Cheong C Tsang 2000 Stapled hemorrhoidectomy-cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months Dis Colon Rectum 43 1666 1675
26. T Pavlidis B Papaziogas A Souparis 2002 Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial Int J Colorectal Dis 17 50 53
27. MS Wilson V Pope HE Doran 2002 Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial Dis Colon Rectum 45 1437 1444
28. KH Khalil A O'Bichere D Sellu 2000 Randomised clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 87 1352 1355
29. Shanmugam V, Thaha MA, Rabindranath KS, Campbell KL, Steele RJ, Loudon MA. Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids. In: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2005
30. PJ Nisar AG Acheson KR Neal JH Scholefield 2004 Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials Dis Colon Rectum 47 1837 1845
31. SY You SH Kim CS Chung DK Lee 2005 Open vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 48 108 113
32. G Arbman H Krook S Haapaniemi 2000 Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy-is there any difference? Dis Colon Rectum 43 31 34
33. MO Guerin R Rosenthal B Kern R Peterli M von Flue C Ackermann 2005 Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 48 1523 1527