Randomized clinical trial of symptom control after stapled anopexy or diathermy excision for haemorrhoid prolapse

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 167-176

  Nystrom P O ^a,b   Qvist, N ^c   Raahave, D ^d   Lindsey, I ^e   Mortensen, N ^e  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d North Sealand Hospital   (Denmark)

^e JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANAL CANAL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCOAGULATION; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HEMORRHOID; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM PROLAPSE; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; ELECTROCOAGULATION; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; RECTAL PROLAPSE; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74549169871     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6804     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355: 768-769.
2. Seow-Choen F. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: pain or gain. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1-3.
3. Wexner SD. The quest for painless surgical treatment of hemorrhoids continues. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193: 174-178.
4. Sharif HI, Lee L, Alexander-Williams J. Diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991; 6: 217-219.
5. Armstrong DN, Ambroze WL, Schertzer ME, Orangio GR. Harmonic Scalpel vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 558-564.
6. Chung CC, Ha JP, Tai YP, Tsang WW, Li MK. Double-blind, randomized trial comparing Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy, bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy, and scissors excision: ligation technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 789-794.
7. Khan S, Pawlak SE, Eggenberger JC, Lee CS, Szilagy EJ, Wu JS et al. Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids: prospective, randomized trial comparing closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the Harmonic Scalpel technique of excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 845-849.
8. Jayne DG, Botterill I, Ambrose NS, Brennan TG, Guillou PJ, O'Riordain DS. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 428-432.
9. Palazzo FF, Francis DL, Clifton MA. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 154-157.
10. Franklin EJ, Seetharam S, Lowney J, Horgan PG. Randomized, clinical trial of Ligasure vs conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1380-1383.
11. Arbman G, Krook H, Haapaniemi S. Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy - is there any difference? Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 31-34.
12. Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, McDonald PJ, Chadwick SJ, Phillips RK. Randomized trial of open versus closed day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 612-613.
13. Gençosmanoǧlu R, Sad O, Koc D, Inceoǧlu R. Hemorrhoidectomy: open or closed technique? A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 70-75.
14. Ho Y, Seow-Choen F, Tan M, Leong AF. Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1729-1730.
15. Ho YH, Buettner PG. Open compared with closed haemorrhoidectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol 2007; 11: 135-143.
16. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy, June 1998; 777-790.
17. Longo A. Stapled anopexy and stapled hemorrhoidectomy: two opposite concepts and procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 571-572.
18. Thompson W. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975; 62: 542-552.
19. Corman ML, Gravié JF, Hager T, Loudon MA, Mascagni D, Nyström PO et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party - indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 304-310.
20. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 669-674.
21. Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, Ho J, Eu KW, Tang CL et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy - cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1666-1675.
22. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 782-785.
23. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1376-1381.
24. Pavlidis T, Papaziogas B, Souparis A, Patsas A, Koutelidakis I, Papaziogas T. Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2002; 17: 50-53.
25. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 779-781.
26. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1049-1053.
27. Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1824-1836.
28. Beattie G, Loudon M. Circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2000; 2: 170-175.
29. Amin AI, Hallböök O, Lee AJ, Sexton R, Moran BJ, Heald RJ. A 5-cm colonic J pouch colo-anal reconstruction following anterior resection for low rectal cancer results in acceptable evacuation and continence in the long term. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 33-37.
30. Hallböök O, Sjödahl R. Surgical approaches to obtaining optimal bowel function. Semin Surg Oncol 2000; 18: 249-258.
31. Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM. Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrhoidectomy; a three and a half year follow up. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 37-38.
32. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, Cioffi U, De Simone M, Salamina G et al. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 64-68.
33. Correa-Rovelo J, Tellez O, Obregón L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S. Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1367-1374.
34. Guy RJ, Ng CE, Eu KW. Stapled anoplasty for haemorrhoids: a comparison of ambulatory vs. in-patient procedures. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 29-32.
35. Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I. Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 93-99.
36. Pescatori M. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 122-123.
37. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (4)CD005393.
38. Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L.The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 172-178.
39. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1837-1845.
40. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendáriz P, De Miguel M. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 809-815.
41. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 878-892.
42. Zacharakis E, Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG, Kanellos I, Angelopoulos S, Mantzoros I et al. Long-term results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for fourth-degree haemorrhoids: a prospective study with median follow-up of 6 years. Tech Coloproctol 2007; 11: 144-147.
43. Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA. Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 337-340.
44. Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, Lombardi A, Bambini C, Renda A. Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 2003; 27: 203-207.
45. Jóhannsson HO, Graf W, Påhlman L. Long-term results of haemorrhoidectomy. Eur J Surg 2002; 168: 485-489.
46. Konsten J, Baeten CG. Hemorrhoidectomy vs. Lord's method: 17-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 503-506.