Cell lineage specific distribution of H3K27 trimethylation accumulation in an in vitro model for human implantation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Teklenburg, Gijs ^a   Weimar, Charlotte H E ^a   Fauser, Bart C J M ^a   Macklon, Nick ^a,b   Geijsen, Niels ^a,c   Heijnen, Cobi J ^a   Chuva de Sousa Lopes, Susana M ^d   Kuijk, Ewart W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA 4; HISTONE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL LINEAGE; CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUALIZATION; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; X CHROMOSOME; CYTOLOGY; DECIDUA; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHYLATION; NIDATION; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

MAMMALIA;

BLASTOCYST; CELL LINEAGE; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, X; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; DECIDUA; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HISTONES; HUMANS; METHYLATION; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

EID: 84857862608     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032701     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Penny GD, Kay GF, Sheardown SA, Rastan S, Brockdorff N, (1996) Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379: 131-137.
2. Marahrens Y, Panning B, Dausman J, Strauss W, Jaenisch R, (1997) Xist-deficient mice are defective in dosage compensation but not spermatogenesis. Genes Dev 11: 156-166.
3. Plath K, Fang J, Mlynarczyk-Evans SK, Cao R, Worringer KA, et al. (2003) Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in X inactivation. Science 300: 131-135.
4. Patrat C, Okamoto I, Diabangouaya P, Vialon V, Le BP, et al. (2009) Dynamic changes in paternal X-chromosome activity during imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 5198-5203.
5. Kay GF, Penny GD, Patel D, Ashworth A, Brockdorff N, et al. (1993) Expression of Xist during mouse development suggests a role in the initiation of X chromosome inactivation. Cell 72: 171-182.
6. Takagi N, Sasaki M, (1975) Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse. Nature 256: 640-642.
7. Hadjantonakis AK, Gertsenstein M, Ikawa M, Okabe M, Nagy A, (1998) Non-invasive sexing of preimplantation stage mammalian embryos. Nat Genet 19: 220-222.
8. Silva J, Nichols J, Theunissen TW, Guo G, van Oosten AL, et al. (2009) Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138: 722-737.
9. West JD, Frels WI, Chapman VM, Papaioannou VE, (1977) Preferential expression of the maternally derived X chromosome in the mouse yolk sac. Cell 12: 873-882.
10. Okamoto I, Otte AP, Allis CD, Reinberg D, Heard E, (2004) Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science 303: 644-649.
11. Mak W, Nesterova TB, de Napoles M, Appanah R, Yamanaka S, et al. (2004) Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Science 303: 666-669.
12. Carver J, Martin K, Spyropoulou I, Barlow D, Sargent I, et al. (2003) An in-vitro model for stromal invasion during implantation of the human blastocyst. Hum Reprod 18: 283-290.
13. Okamoto I, Patrat C, Thépot D, Peynot N, Fauque P, et al. (2011) Eutherian mammals use diverse strategies to initiate X-chromosome inactivation during development. Nature 472: 370-374.
14. van den Berg I, Laven JS, Stevens M, Jonkers I, Galjaard RJ, et al. (2009) X chromosome inactivation is initiated in human preimplantation embryos. Am J Hum Genet 84: 771-779.
15. Teklenburg G, Macklon NS, (2009) Review: in vitro models for the study of early human embryo-endometrium interactions. Reprod Sci 16: 811-818.
16. Grewal S, Carver JG, Ridley AJ, Mardon HJ, (2008) Implantation of the human embryo requires Rac1-dependent endometrial stromal cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 16189-16194.
17. Tang B, Guller S, Gurpide E, (1994) Mechanism of human endometrial stromal cells decidualization. Ann NY Acad Sci 734: 19-25.
18. Yeom YI, Fuhrmann G, Ovitt CE, Brehm A, Ohbo K, et al. (1996) Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells. Development 122: 881-894.
19. Palmieri SL, Peter W, Hess H, Scholer HR, (1994) Oct-4 transcription factor is differentially expressed in the mouse embryo during establishment of the first two extraembryonic cell lineages involved in implantation. Dev Biol 166: 259-267.
20. Morrisey EE, Tang Z, Sigrist K, Lu MM, Jiang F, et al. (1998) GATA6 regulates HNF4 and is required for differentiation of visceral endoderm in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev 12: 3579-3590.
21. Rosner MH, Vigano MA, Ozato K, Timmons PM, Poirier F, et al. (1990) A POU-domain transcription factor in early stem cells and germ cells of the mammalian embryo. Nature 345: 686-692.
22. Yamaguchi S, Kimura H, Tada M, Nakatsuji N, Tada T, (2005) Nanog expression in mouse germ cell development. Gene Expr Patterns 5: 639-646.
23. Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, et al. (2003) The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113: 631-642.
24. Chazaud C, Yamanaka Y, Pawson T, Rossant J, (2006) Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. Dev Cell 10: 615-624.
25. Hatano SY, Tada M, Kimura H, Yamaguchi S, Kono T, et al. (2005) Pluripotential competence of cells associated with Nanog activity. Mech Dev 122: 67-79.
26. Cauffman G, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A, Van de Velde H, (2006) POU5F1 isoforms show different expression patterns in human embryonic stem cells and preimplantation embryos. Stem Cells 24: 2685-2691.
27. Chen AE, Egli D, Niakan K, Deng J, Akutsu H, et al. (2009) Optimal timing of inner cell mass isolation increases the efficiency of human embryonic stem cell derivation and allows generation of sibling cell lines. Cell Stem Cell 4: 103-106.
28. O'Leary T, Heindryckx B, Lierman S, Van der Jeught M, Menten B, et al. (2011) The influence of early embryo traits on human embryonic stem cell derivation efficiency. Stem Cells Dev 20: 785-793.
29. Navarro P, Oldfield A, Legoupi J, Festuccia N, Dubois A, et al. (2010) Molecular coupling of Tsix regulation and pluripotency. Nature 468: 457-460.
30. Navarro P, Chambers I, Karwacki-Neisius V, Chureau C, Morey C, et al. (2008) Molecular coupling of Xist regulation and pluripotency. Science 321: 1693-1695.
31. Heijnen EM, Eijkemans MJ, de Klerk C, Polinder S, Beckers NG, et al. (2007) A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 369: 743-749.
32. de Jong D, Eijkemans MJ, Beckers NG, Pruijsten RV, Fauser BC, et al. (2002) The added value of embryo cryopreservation to cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates per IVF treatment: is cryopreservation worth the effort? J Assist Reprod Genet 19: 561-568.
33. Brosens JJ, Hayashi N, White JO, (1999) Progesterone receptor regulates decidual prolactin expression in differentiating human endometrial stromal cells. Endocrinology 140: 4809-4820.
34. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ, (2004) Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11: 36-42.