Temporal susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to trunk pathogen infection in South African grapevines

Phytopathologia Mediterranea

Volumn 50, Issue SUPPL., 2011, Pages

  Van Niekerk, Jan M ^a   Halleen, Francois ^a,b   Fourie, Paul H ^a,c  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ   (South Africa)

^c CITRUS RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Botryosphaeriaceae; Eutypa; Phaeoacremonium; Phaeomoniella; Phomopsis

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOTRYOSPHAERIACEAE; EUTYPA; EUTYPA LATA; PHAEOACREMONIUM; PHAEOMONIELLA; PHAEOMONIELLA CHLAMYDOSPORA; PHOMOPSIS; PHOMOPSIS VITICOLA; VITIS;

EID: 84857828130     PISSN: 00319465     EISSN: 15932095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adalat K., C. Whiting, S. Rooney and W.D. Gubler, 2000. Pathogenicity of three Phaeoacremonium spp. on grapevine in California. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 39, 92-99.
2. Bester W., P.W. Crous and P.H. Fourie, 2007. Evaluation of fungicides as potential grapevine pruning wound protectants against Botryosphaeria species. Australasian Plant Pathology 36, 73-77.
3. Biggs A.R., 1987. Occurrence and location of suberin in wound reaction zones in xylem of 17 tree species. Phytopathology 77, 718-725.
4. Biggs A.R., 1990. Managing wound-associated diseases by understanding wound healing in the bark of woody plants. Journal of Arboriculture 16, 108-112.
5. Buhtz A., A. Kolasa, K. Arlt, C. Walz and J. Kehr, 2004. Xylem sap protein composition is conserved among different plant species. Planta 219, 610-618.
6. Chapuis L., L. Richard and B. Dubos, 1998. Variation in susceptibility of grapevine pruning wound to infection by Eutypa lata in south-western France. Plant Pathology 47, 463-472.
7. Crous P.W., B. Slippers, M.J.Wingfield, J. Rheeder, W.F.O. Marasas, A.J.L. Phillips, A. Alves, T. Burgess, P. Barber and J.Z. Groenewald, 2006. Phylogenetic lineages in the Botryosphaeriaceae. Studies in Mycology 55, 235-253.
8. Eskalen A. and W.D. Gubler, 2001. Association of spores of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, Phaeoacremonium inflatipes and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum with grapevine cordons in California. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 40, S429-S432.
9. Feliciano A. and W.D. Gubler, 2001. Histological investigations on infection of grape roots and shoots by Phaeoacremonium spp. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 40, S387-S393.
10. Ferreira J.H.S., F.N. Matthee and A.C. Thomas, 1989. Fungi associated with dieback and pruning wounds of grapevines in South Africa. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 10, 62-66.
11. Ferreira J.H.S., F.N. Matthee and A.C. Thomas, 1991. Biological control of Eutypa lata on grapevine by an antagonistic strain of Bacillus subtilis. Phytopathology 81, 283-287.
12. Ferreira J.H.S., 1999. Growth of Eutypa lata in grapevine wood extracts. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 20, 53-56.
13. Fourie P.H. and F. Halleen, 2002. Investigation on the occurrence of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in canes of rootstock mother vines. Australasian Plant Pathology 31, 425-426.
14. Gubler W.D., A. Eskalen, A.J. Feliciano and A. Khan, 2001. Susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium spp. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 40, S482-S483.
15. Halleen F. and P.H. Fourie, 2005. Protection of grapevine pruning wounds against fungal infections. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 44, 117-118.
16. Hewitt W.B. and R.C. Pearson, 1988. Phomopsis cane and leaf spot. In: Compendium of Grape Diseases. (Pearson R.C., Goheen A.C., ed.), APS Press, MN, USA, 17-18.
17. John S., R. Lardner, E. Scott, B. Stummer and T. Wicks, 2001. Eutypa dieback: research on biological control and diagnostics. The Australian & New Zealand Grapegrower & Winemaker, Annual Technical Issue, 2001, 73-75.
18. Larignon P. and B. Dubos, 2000. Preliminary studies on the biology of Phaeoacremonium. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 39, 184-189.
19. Lehoczky J., 1974. Black dead-arm disease of grapevines caused by Botryosphaeria stevensii infection. Acta Phytopathologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 9, 319-327.
20. Lehoczky J., 1988. Black dead arm. In: Compendium of Grape Diseases. (Pearson R.C., Goheen A.C., ed.), APS Press, MN, USA, 35.
21. Mauseth J., 1995. Botany. An Introduction to Plant Biology. Second Edition. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
22. Merrin S.J., N.G. Nair and J. Tarran, 1995. Variation in Phomopsis recorded on grapevine in Australia and its taxonomic and biological implications. Australasian Plant Pathology, 24, 44-56.
23. Moller W.J., A.J. Braun, J.K. Uyemoto and A.N. Kasimatis, 1977. Eutypa armeniacae inoculum associated with dead arm-affected grapevines in New York and Ontario. Plant Disease Reporter 61, 422-423.
24. Moller W.J. and A.N. Kasimatis, 1980. Dieback of grapevines caused by Eutypa armeniacae. Plant Disease Reporter 62, 254-258.
25. Mostert L., F. Halleen, P. Fourie and P.W. Crous, 2006. A review of Phaeoacremonium species involved in Petri disease and esca of grapevines. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 45, S12-S29.
26. Mugnai L., A. Graniti and G. Surico, 1999. Esca (black measles) and brown wood-streaking: two old and elusive diseases of grapevines. Plant Disease 83, 404-416.
27. Munkvold G.P. and J.J. Marois, 1993. The effects of fungicides on Eutypa lata germination, growth and infection of grapevines. Plant Disease 77, 50-55.
28. Munkvold G.P., J.A. Duthie and J.J. Marois, 1994. Reductions in yield and vegetative growth of grapevines due to Eutypa dieback. Phytopathology 84, 186-192.
29. Munkvold G.P. and J.J. Marois, 1995. Factors associated with variation in susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to infection by Eutypa lata. Phytopathology 85, 249-256.
30. Rolshausen P.E. and W.D. Gubler, 2005. Use of boron for the control of Eutypa dieback of grapevines. Plant Disease 89, 734-738.
31. Rolshausen P.E., J.R. Úrbez-Torres, S. Rooney-Latham, A. Eskalen, R.J. Smith and W.D. Gubler, 2010. Evaluation of pruning wound susceptibility and protection against fungi associated with grapevine trunk diseases. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 61, 113-119.
32. Rooney S., A. Eskalen and W.D. Gubler, 2001. Recovery of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium inflatipes from soil and grapevine tissues. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 40, S351-S356.
33. Serra S., M.A. Mannoni and V. Ligios, 2008. Studies on the susceptibility of pruning wounds to infection by fungi involved in grapevine wood diseases in Italy. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 47, 234-246.
34. Sosnowski M.R., M.L. Creaser and T.J. Wicks, 2005. Field evaluation of pruning wound treatments for control of Eutypa dieback. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 44, 114.
35. Sun Q., T.L. Rost and M.A. Matthews, 2006. Pruning-induced tylose development in stems of current-year shoots of Vitis vinifera (Vitaceae). American Journal of Botany 93, 1567-1576.
36. Trese A.T., C.L. Burton and D.C. Ramsdell, 1980. Eutypa armeniacae in Michigan vineyards: Ascospores production and survival, host infection, and fungal growth at low temperatures. Phytopathology 70, 788-793.
37. Van Niekerk J.M., 2008. Epidemiology of selected grapevine trunk disease-causing pathogens in South Africa. PhD thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 194 pp.
38. Van Niekerk J.M., P.W. Crous, J.Z. Groenewald, P.H. Fourie and F. Halleen, 2004. DNA phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria species on grapevines. Mycologia 96, 781-798.
39. Van Niekerk J.M., J.Z. Groenewald, D.F. Farr, P.H. Fourie, F. Halleen and P.W. Crous, 2005. Reassessment of Phomopsis species on grapevine. Australasian Plant Pathology 34, 27-39.
40. Van Niekerk J.M., F.J. Calitz, F. Halleen and P.H. Fourie, 2010a. Temporal spore dispersal patterns of grapevine trunk pathogens in South Africa. European Journal of Plant Pathology DOI 10.1007/s10658-010-9604-2.
41. Van Niekerk J.M., W. Bester, F. Halleen, P.W. Crous and P.H. Fourie, 2010b. First report of Lasiodiplodia crassispora as a pathogen of grapevine trunks in South Africa. Plant Disease 94, 1063.