Modeling of pedestrian activity at signalized intersections: Land use, urban form, weather, and spatiotemporal patterns

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2264, 2011, Pages 74-82

  Miranda Moreno, Luis F ^a   Fernandes, David ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POPULATION STATISTICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC SIGNALS;

CONDITION; FLOW BYES; MODEL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; PEAK PERIOD; PEDESTRIAN FLOW; POPULATION DENSITIES; SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION; SPATIOTEMPORAL PATTERNS; URBAN FORM; WEATHER PATTERNS;

LAND USE;

EID: 84857818148     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2264-09     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Greene-Roesel, R., M. C. Diogenes, and D. R. Ragland. Estimating Pedestrian Accident Exposure. Protocol report UCB-TSC-RR-2007-5.Traffic Safety Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.http://escholarship.org/uc/ item/8j8685jt. Accessed July 30, 2010.
2. Elvik, R. The Non-Linearity of Risk and the Promotion of Environmentally Sustainable Transport. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2009, pp. 849-855.
3. Miranda-Moreno, L. F., A. M. El-Geneidy, and P. Morency. How Does the Built Environment Influence Pedestrian Activity and Pedestrian Collisions at Intersections? Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
4. Schneider, R. J., L. S. Arnold, and D. R. Ragland. Pilot Model for Estimating Pedestrian Intersection Crossing Volumes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 13-26.
5. Kaura, S., M. Nieuwenhuijsen, and N. Colvile. Pedestrian Exposure to Air Pollution Along a Major Road in Central London, United Kingdom. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 39, No. 38, 2005, pp. 7307-7320.
6. Pulugurtha, S. S., and S. R. Repaka. Assessment of Models to Measure Pedestrian Activity at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2073, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 39-48.
7. Aultman-Hall, L., D. Lane, and R. R. Lambert. Assessing Impact of Weather and Season on Pedestrian Traffic Volumes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 35-43.
8. Greene-Roesel, R., M. C. Diogenes, D. R. Ragland, and L. A. Lindau. Effectiveness of a Commercially Available Automated Pedestrian Counting Device in Urban Environments: Comparison with Manual Counts. Traffic Safety Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/ 2n83w1q8. Accessed July 30, 2010.
9. Schneider, R. J., L. S. Arnold, and D. R. Ragland. Methodology for Counting Pedestrians at Intersections: Use of Automated Counters to Extrapolate Weekly Volumes from Short Manual Counts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 1-12.
10. Pucher, J., and R. Buehler. Why Canadians Cycle More Than Americans: A Comparative Analysis of Bicycling Trends and Policies. Transportation Policy, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2006, pp. 265-279.
11. Behnam, J., and B. G. Patel. A Method for Estimating Pedestrian Volume in a Central Business District (Abridgement). In Transportation Research Record 629, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 22-26.
12. Qin, X., and J. N. Ivan. Estimating Pedestrian Exposure Prediction Model in Rural Areas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1773, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 89-96.
13. Manaugh, K., L. Miranda-Moreno, and A. El-Geneidy. The Effect of Neighbourhood Characteristics, Accessibility, Home-Work Location, and Demographics on Commuting Distances. Transportation, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2010, pp. 627-646.
14. Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1997, pp. 199-219.
15. Ewing, R., and E. Dumbaugh. The Built Environment and Traffic Safety: A Review of Empirical Evidence. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2009, pp. 347-367.
16. Feng, C. Synthesis of Studies on Speed and Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1779, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 86-92.