Pilot model for estimating pedestrian intersection crossing volumes

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2140, 2009, Pages 13-26

  Schneider, Robert J ^a   Arnold, Lindsay S ^a   Ragland, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; INFORMATION USE; MODEL STRUCTURES; PEDESTRIAN SAFETY; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

CALIFORNIA; DATA COLLECTION; METHOD OF MODELING; NEIGHBOURHOOD; PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT; PILOT MODEL; PROPERTY; SIMPLE++; SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

LAND USE;

EID: 76749108608     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2140-02     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Turner, S., G. Shunk, and A. Hottenstein. Development of a Methodology to Estimate Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Demand. Research Project Number 0-1723, Report 1723-S. Texas Transportation Institute; Texas Department of Transportation;FHWA,U.S. Department of Transportation, Sept. 1998.
2. Ercolano, J. M., J. S. Olson, and D. M. Spring. Sketch-Plan Method for Estimating Pedestrian Traffic for Central Business Districts and Suburban Growth Corridors. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 38-47.
3. Landis, B. W. The Bicycle System Performance Measures: The Intersection Hazard and Latent Demand Score Models. ITE Journal, Vol.66, No.2, 1996, pp. 18-26.
4. Portland Pedestrian Master Plan. Office of Transportation Engineering and Development, City of Portland, Ore., June 1998.
5. District of Columbia Pedestrian Master Plan. District of Columbia Department of Transportation, 2008.
6. Alexandria Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Plan. City of Alexandria, Va., June 2008. http://alexandriava.gov/localmotion/info/default.aspx? id?11418.
7. Purvis, C. Incorporating Land Use and Accessibility Variables in Travel Demand Models. Presented at ASCE Specialty Conference on Transportation, Lane Use, and Air Quality, Portland, Ore., 1998. www.mtc.ca.gov/ maps-and-data/ datamart/research/ascepurv.htm.
8. Purvis, C. Incorporating Effects of Smart Growth and Transit-Oriented Development in San Francisco Bay Area Travel Demand Models: Current and Future Strategies. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., 2003. www.mtc.ca.gov/maps-and-data/datamart/research/ Incorporating-Smart-Growth-MTC- models.pdf.
9. 1000 Friends of Oregon. LUTRAQ: Making the Land Use Transportation Air Quality Connection, Vol.4A: The Pedestrian Environment. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.; Cambridge Systematics, Inc.; Calthorpe Associates, Dec. 1993. http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/tped.html.
10. Clifton, K. J., C. V. Burnier, S. Huang, M. W. Kang, and R. Schneider. A Meso-Scale Model of Pedestrian Demand. Presented at Fourth Joint Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning and the Association of European Schools of Planning, Chicago, Ill., July 6-11, 2008.
11. Zupan, J. M., and B. Pushkarev. Pedestrian Travel Demand. In Highway Research Record 355, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 37-53.
12. Benham, J., and B. G. Patel. A Method for Estimating Pedestrian Volume in a Central Business District. In Transportation Research Record 629, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 22-26.
13. Raford, N., and D. Ragland. Space Syntax: Innovative Pedestrian Volume Modeling Tool for Pedestrian Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1878, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 66-74.
14. Raford, N., and D. Ragland. Pedestrian Volume Modeling for Traffic Safety and Exposure Analysis. Traffic Safety Center White Paper. University of California, Berkeley, Dec. 2005. http://repositories.cdlib.org/its/tsc/ UCB-TSC-RR-2005-TRB2.
15. Desyllas, J., E. Duxbury, J. Ward, and A. Smith. Pedestrian Demand Modelling of Large Cities: An Applied Example from London. Center for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, June 2003. www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/ working-papers/paper62.pdf.
16. Intelligent Space Partnership. Fathom: Visibility Graph Analysis Software. www.intelligentspace.com/tech/fathom.htm. Accessed July 15, 2008.
17. Pulugurtha, S. S., and S. R. Repaka. Assessment of Models to Measure Pedestrian Activity at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.2073, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 39-48.
18. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87-113.
19. Handy, S. Critical Assessment of the Literature on the Relationships Among Transportation, Land Use, and Physical Activity. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005. http://trb.org/ downloads/sr282 papers/sr282Handy.pdf.
20. Krizek, K. Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for Land Use- Travel Behavior Research and Regional Modeling. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol.22, 2003, pp. 270-287.
21. Shriver, K. Influence of Environmental Design on Pedestrian Travel Behavior in Four Austin Neighborhoods. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 64-75.
22. Cameron, R. M. Pedestrian Volume Characteristics. Traffic Engineering, Vol.47, No.1, Jan. 1977, pp. 36-37.
23. U.S. Census Bureau. 2007 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. 2007.
24. Davis, S. E., L. E. King, and D. H. Robertson. Predicting Pedestrian Crosswalk Volumes. In Transportation Research Record 1168, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 25-30.
25. Zeeger, C. V., R. Stewart, H. Huang, P. A. Lagerwey, J. Feaganes, and B. J. Campbell. Safety Effects of Marked versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Final Report and Recommended Guidelines. Report FHWA-HRT-04-100. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005.
26. Hocherman, I., A. S. Hakkert, and J. Bar-Ziv. Estimating the Daily Volume of Crossing Pedestrians from Short-Counts. In Transportation Research Record 1168, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 31-38.
27. Greene-Roesel, R., M. C. Diogenes, D. R. Ragland, and L. A. Lindau. Effectiveness of a Commercially Available Automated Pedestrian Counting Device in Urban Environments: Comparison with Manual Counts. Traffic Safety Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2007. www.tsc. berkeley.edu/news/08- 0503session240ryanposter.pdf.
28. Schneider, R. J., L. S. Arnold, and D. R. Ragland. Methodology for Counting Pedestrians at Intersections: Use of Automated Counters to Extrapolate Weekly Volumes from Short Manual Counts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 1-12.