Improving the Predictive Accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 With Older Sex Offenders: Revised Age Weights

Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 64-101

  Helmus, Leslie ^a,b   Thornton, David ^c   Hanson, R Karl ^a   Babchishin, Kelly M ^a,b  

^a PUBLIC SAFETY CANADA   (Canada)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Centre   (United States)

Author keywords

age; prediction; recidivism; risk assessment; sex offenders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857813485     PISSN: 10790632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1079063211409951     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Administration on Aging. (2009). Aging statistics. Washington, DC: Administration on Aging, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://www.aoa.gov/AoARoot/Aging_Statistics/index.aspx.
2. *Allan M.,Grace R. C.,Rutherford B.,Hudson S. M.Psychometric assessment of dynamic risk factors for child molesters.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2007;19:347-367. doi:10.1007/s11194-007-9052-5.
3. Allison P. D.Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE; 1984:.
4. Archer R. P.,Buffington-Vollum J. K.,Stredny R. V.,Handel R. W.A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2006;87:84-94. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_07.
5. Babchishin K. M.,Hanson R. K.,Helmus L.The RRASOR, Static-99R, and Static-2002R all add incrementally to the prediction of recidivism among sex offenders (Corrections Research User Report No. 2011-02). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada; 2011:.
6. Barbaree H. E.,Blanchard R.Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Laws D. R.O'Donohue W. T., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2008:37-60.
7. Barbaree H. E.,Langton C. M.,Blanchard R.Predicting recidivism in sex offenders using the VRAG and SORAG: The contribution of age-at-release.International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 2007;6:29-46.
8. Barbaree H. E.,Langton C. M.,Blanchard R.,Cantor J. M.Aging versus stable enduring traits as explanatory constructs in sex offender recidivism: Partitioning actuarial prediction into conceptually meaningful components.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2009;36:443-465. doi:10.1177/0093854809332283.
9. *Bartosh D. L.,Garby T.,Lewis D.,Gray S.Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology. 2003;47:422-438. doi:10.1177/0306624X03253850.
10. Beech A.,Friendship C.,Erikson M.,Hanson R. K.The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and reconviction in a sample of U.K. child abusers.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2002;14:155-167. doi:10.1177/107906320201400206.
11. *Bengtson S.Is newer better? A cross-validation of the Static-2002 and the Risk Matrix 2000 in a Danish sample of sexual offenders.Psychology, Crime & Law. 2008;14:85-106. doi:10.1080/10683160701483104.
12. *Bigras J. (2007). La prédiction de la récidive chez les délinquants sexuels [Prediction of recidivism among sex offenders]. Dissertations Abstracts International. 68 (09):(UMI No.NR30941).
13. Boe R.,Nafekh M.,Vuong B.,Sinclair R.,Cousineau C.The changing profile of the federal inmate population: 1997 and 2002 (Research Report No. R-132). Ottawa, Ontario: Correctional Services Canada; 2003:.
14. *BoerA. (2003). Evaluating the Static-99 and Static-2002 risk scales using Canadian sexual offenders (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
15. Bonta J.,Law M.,Hanson K.The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin. 1998;123 (2): 123-142.
16. *Bonta J.Yessine A. K. (2005). [Recidivism data for 124 released sexual offenders from the offenders identified in The National Flagging System: Identifying and responding to high-risk, violent offenders (User Report 2005-04). Ottawa: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada]. Unpublished raw data.
17. *Brouillette-Alarie S.,Proulx J. (2008, October). Predictive and convergent validity of phallometric assessment in relation to sexual recidivism risk. Poster presented at the annual conference for the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Atlanta, GA.
18. *CortoniF.NunesK. L. (2007). Assessing the effectiveness of the National Sexual Offender Program (Research Report No. R-183; Unpublished report). Correctional Service of Canada.
19. Craig L. A.,Thornton D.,Beech A.,Browne K. D.The relationship of statistical and psychological risk markers to sexual reconviction in child molesters.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2007;34:314-329. doi:10.1177/0093854806291416
20. *CraissatiJ.BiererK.SouthR. (2008). What do sex offenders really get up to? Risk prediction, community failure and "sexually risky behaviours" in a nine year follow up study. Unpublished manuscript. Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, Bracton Centre, Dartford, United Kingdom.
21. Dawes R. M.,Faust D.,Meehl P. E.Clinical versus actuarial judgment.Science. 1989;243:1668-1674. doi:10.1126/science.2648573.
22. *EherR.RettenbergerM.SchillingF.PfafflinF. (2008). Failure of Static-99 and SORAG to predict relevant reoffense categories in relevant sexual offender subtypes: A prospective study. Sexual Offender Treatment, 8(1), 1-20. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/sot-1-2008.html.
23. *EherR.RettenbergerM.SchillingF.PfafflinF. (2009). [Data from sex offenders released from prison in Austria]. Unpublished raw data.
24. *EppersonD. L. (2003). Validation of the MnSOST-R, Static-99, and RRASOR with North Dakota prison and probation samples. Unpublished Technical Assistance Report, North Dakota Division of Parole and Probation.
25. Ferguson G. A.(1976). Statistical analysis in psychology and education (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26. Fleiss J. L.,Levin B.,Paik M. C. (2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
27. Gail M. H.,Pfeiffer R. M.On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk.Biostatistics. 2005;6:227-239. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxi005
28. Grove W. M.,Zald D. H.,Lebow B. S.,Snitz B. E.,Nelson C.Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis.Psychological Assessment. 2000;12:19-30. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19.
29. *HaagA. M. (2005). [recidivism data from 198 offenders detained until their warrant expiry date. From: Do psychological interventions impact on actuarial measures: An analysis of the predictive validity of the Static-99 and Static-2002 on a re-conviction measure of sexual recidivism. Dissertations Abstracts International, 66 (08), 4531B. (UMI No. NR05662)]. Unpublished raw data.
30. Hanley J. A.,McNeil B. J.A method of comparing the Areas under ROC curves derived from same cases.Radiology. 1983;148:839-843.
31. Hanson R. K.Recidivism and age: Follow-up data from 4,673 sexual offenders.Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2002;17:1046-1062. doi:10.1177/088626002236659.
32. Hanson R. K.Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2006;18:343-355. doi:10.1007/s11194-006-9027-y.
33. HansonR. K. (2008). What statistics should we use to report predictive accuracy. Crime Scene, 15(1), 15-17. Retrieved from http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/Criminal%20Justice/Crime%20Scene%202008-04.pdf.
34. Hanson R. K.,Bussière M. T.Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998;66:348-362.
35. *Hanson R. K.,Harris A. J. R.,Scott T.,Helmus L.Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (Corrections Research User Report No. 2007-05). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada; 2007:.
36. Hanson R. K.,Helmus L.,Thornton D.Predicting recidivism among sexual offenders: A multi-site study of Static-2002.Law and Human Behavior. 2010;34:198-211. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9180-1
37. Hanson R. K.,Morton-Bourgon K. E.The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.Psychological Assessment. 2009;21:1-21. doi:10.1037/a0014421.
38. Hanson R. K.,Thornton D.Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales.Law and Human Behavior. 2000;24:119-136. doi:10.1023/A:1005482921333.
39. Hanson R. K.,Thornton D.Notes on the development of Static-2002. (Corrections Research User Report No. 2003-01). Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada; 2003:.
40. *HarkinsL.BeechA. R. (2007). Examining the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment using risk band analysis. Unpublished manuscript. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
41. Harris A. J. R.,Phenix A.,Hanson R. K.,Thornton D.Static-99 coding rules: Revised 2003. Ottawa, Ontario: Solicitor General Canada; 2003:.
42. Harris G. T.,Rice M. E.Adjusting actuarial violence risk assessments based on aging or the passage of time.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2007a;34:297-313. doi:10.1177/0093854806293486.
43. Harris G. T.,Rice M. E.Characterizing the value of actuarial violence risk assessments.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2007b;34:1638-1658. doi:10.1177/0093854807307029.
44. *Harris G. T.,Rice M. E.,Quinsey V. L.,Lalumière M. L.,Boer D.,Lang C.A multi-site comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.Psychological Assessment. 2003;15:413-425.
45. Helmus L. (2009). Re-norming Static-99 recidivism estimates: Exploring base rate variability across sex offender samples (Master's thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. MR58443) and also from www.static99.org.
46. *Hill A.,Habermann N.,Klusmann D.,Berner W.,Briken P.Criminal recidivism in sexual homicide perpetrators.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2008;52:5-20. doi:10.1177/0306624X07307450.
47. Hirschi T.,Gottfredson M. R.Age and the explanation of crime.American Journal of Sociology. 1983;89:552-584. doi:10.1086/227905.
48. Hosmer D. W.,Lemeshow S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
49. Humphreys L. G.,Swets J. A.Comparison of predictive validities measured with biserial correlations and ROCs of signal detection theory.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1991;76:316-321. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.316.
50. Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision. (2007). Sex offender assessment information survey. Lexington, KY: Author.
51. Jackson R. L.,Hess D. T.Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2007;19:409-448. doi:10.1007/s11194-007-9062-3
52. *Johansen S. H.Accuracy of predictions of sexual offense recidivism: A comparison of actuarial and clinical methods (UMI No. 3255527).Dissertations Abstracts International. 2007;68 (03): B.
53. *Knight R. A.,Thornton D. (2007) Evaluating and improving risk assessment schemes for sexual recidivism: A long-term follow-up of convicted sexual offenders. (Document No. 217618). Submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice.
54. *Langström N.Accuracy of actuarial procedures for assessment of sexual offender recidivism risk vary across ethnicity.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2004;16:107-120. doi:10.1177/107906320401600202.
55. Laub J. H.,Nagin D. S.,Sampson R. J.Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process.American Sociological Review. 1998;63:225-238. doi:10.2307/2657324.
56. Maruna S.Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001:.
57. McGrath R. J.,Cumming G. F.,Burchard B. L.,Zeoli S.,Ellerby L.Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Foundation; 2010:.
58. Meehl P. E.Wanted-A good cook-book.American Psychologist. 1956;11:263-272. doi:10.1037/h0044164
59. Moffitt T. E.Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy.Psychological Review. 1993;100:674-701. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674.
60. Mossman D.Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1994;62:783-792. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783.
61. *Nicholaichuk T. (2001, November). The comparison of two standardized risk assessment instruments in a sample of Canadian Aboriginal sexual offenders. Paper presented at the annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Antonio, TX.
62. Olver M. E.,Wong S. C. P.,Nicholaichuk T.,Gordon A.The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change.Psychological Assessment. 2007;19:318-329. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318.
63. PhenixA.DorenD.HelmusL.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2009). Coding rules for Static-2002. Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/sttc-2002-eng.pdf.
64. Rice M. E.,Harris G. T.Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen's d, and r.Law and Human Behavior. 2005;29:615-620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7.
65. Rockhill B.,Byrne C.,Rosner B.,Louie M. M.,Colditz G.Breast cancer risk prediction with a log-incidence model: Evaluation of accuracy.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2003;56:856-861. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00124-0.
66. Sampson R. J.,Laub J. H.Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70.Criminology. 2003;41:555-592. doi:10.1177/0002716205280075.
67. *Saum S.A comparison of an actuarial risk prediction measure (Static-99) and a stable dynamic risk prediction measure (Stable-2000) in making risk predictions for a group of sexual offenders (UMI No. 3255539).Dissertations Abstracts International. 2007;68 (03): B.
68. Serin R. C.,Lloyd C.Examining the process of offender change: The transition to crime desistance.Psychology, Crime & Law. 2009;15:347-364.
69. Soothill K. L.,Gibbens T. C. N.Recidivism of sexual offenders: A re-appraisal.British Journal of Criminology. 1978;18:267-276.
70. Statistics Canada. (2008). Report on the demographic situation in Canada: 2005 and 2006 (Catalogue No. 91-209-X). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
71. Stouthamer-Loeber M.,Wei E.,Loeber R.,Masten A. S.Desistance from persistent serious delinquency in the transition to adulthood.Development and Psychopathology. 2004;16:897-918. doi:10.1017/S0954579404040064.
72. *Swinburne Romine R.,Dwyer S. M.,Mathiowetz C.,Thomas M. (2008, October). Thirty years of sex offender specific treatment: A follow-up Study. Poster presented at the conference for the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Atlanta, GA.
73. *Ternowski D. R.Sex offender treatment: An evaluation of the Stave Lake Correctional Centre Program.Dissertations Abstracts International. 2004;66 (06): 3428B. (UMI No.NR03201).
74. Thornton D. Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2002;14:139-153. doi:10.1023/A:1014620214905.
75. Thornton D.Age and sexual recidivism: A variable connection.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2006;18:123-135. doi:10.1007/s11194-006-9007-2.
76. Turcotte M.,Schellenberg G.A portrait of seniors in Canada (Catalogue No. 89-519-XIE). Ottawa, Ontario: Social and Aboriginal Statistics Division, Statistics Canada; 2007.
77. Viallon V.,Ragusa S.,Clavel-Chapelon F.,Bénichou J.How to evaluate the calibration of a disease risk prediction tool.Statistics in Medicine. 2009;28:901-916. doi:10.1002/sim.3517.
78. *Wilson R. J.,Cortoni F.,Vermani M.Circles of support and accountability: A national replication of outcome findings (Report No. R-185). Ottawa, Ontario: Correctional Service of Canada; 2007a:.
79. *Wilson R. J.,Picheca J. E.,Prinzo M.Evaluating the effectiveness of professionally-facilitated volunteerism in the community-based management of high-risk sexual offenders: Part two-A comparison of recidivism rates.Howard Journal. 2007b;46:327-337. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00480.x.
80. Wollert R. (2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 12:56-85. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.12.1.56.
81. Wollert R., Cramer E., Waggoner J., Skelton A., Vess J. (2010) Recent research (N = 9,305) underscores the importance of using age-stratified actuarial tables in sex offender risk assessments.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22:471-490. doi:10.1177/1079063210384633.