"They Were My Eggs; They Were Her Babies": Known Oocyte Donors' Conceptualizations of Their Reproductive Material

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1134-1140

  Blyth, Eric ^a   Yee, Samantha ^b,c   Ka Tat Tsang, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Counselling; Embryo disposition; Known oocyte donation; Perceptions of reproductive material; Unused embryos

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; CANADIAN; DONOR; EMBRYO; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; OOCYTE; OOCYTE DONATION; PERCEPTION; RECIPIENT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; ALTRUISM; EMBRYO DISPOSITION; FAMILY; FRIEND; LEGAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; ALTRUISM; CANADA; EMBRYO DISPOSITION; FAMILY; FEMALE; FRIENDS; HUMANS; OOCYTE DONATION; PERCEPTION; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 84857775298     PISSN: 17012163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35081-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Assisted Human Reproduction Act SC 2004:c2 2004, House of Commons, Ottawa, Available at, Accessed August 23, 2011. http://www.laws.justice.gc.ca/en/A-13.4/index.htm.
2. Blyth E., Frith L., Paul L., Berger R. Embryo relinquishment for family-building: how should it be conceptualised?. Int J Law Policy Family 2011, 25:260-285.
3. Sehnert B., Chetkowski J. Secondary donation of frozen embryos is more common after pregnancy initiation with donated eggs than after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril 1998, 69:350-352.
4. Brzyski R., Witz C., Eddy C., Pierce J., Binkley P., Shenken R. Association between donor gametes and choice of embryo donation for final disposition of cryopreserved embryos. Fertil Steril 2001, 76(3 Supp 1):S197-S198.
5. Hammarberg K., Tinney L. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples' decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertil Steril 2006, 86:86-91.
6. Khamsi F., Endman M.W., Lacanna I.C., Wong J. Some psychological aspects of oocyte donation from known donors on altruistic basis. Fertil Steril 1997, 68:323-327.
7. Winter A., Daniluk J. A gift from the heart: the experiences of women whose egg donations helped their sisters become mothers. J Counsel Dev 2004, 82:483-495.
8. Yee S., Hitkari J., Greenblatt E.M. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons. Hum Reprod 2007, 22:2040-2050.
9. Purewal S., van den Akker O.B.A. Systemic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Hum Reprod Update 2009, 15:499-515.
10. Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
11. American Society for Reproductive Medicine Ethics Committee Family members as gamete donors and surrogates. Fertil Steril 2003, 80:1124-1130.
12. American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation. Fertil Steril 2006, 86(Suppl 4):S38-S50.
13. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology Task Force on Ethics and Law Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod 2002, 17:1407-1408.
14. Greenfeld D.A., Mazure C.M., Olive D.L., Keefe D.L. Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995, 12:118-122.
15. Kalfoglou A.L., Geller G. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation. Fertil Steril 2000, 74:660-667.
16. Kalfoglou A.L., Gittelsohn J. A qualitative follow-up study of women's experiences with oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 2000, 15:798-805.
17. Klock S.C., Stout J.E., Davidson M. Psychological characteristics and factors related to willingness to donate again among anonymous oocyte donors. Fertil Steril 2003, 79:1312-1317.
18. Partrick M., Smith A.L., Meyer W.R., Bashford R.A. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up questionnaire. Fertil Steril 2001, 75:1034-1036.
19. Byrd L.M., Sidebotham M., Lieberman B. Egg donation-the donor's view: an aid to future recruitment. Hum Fertil 2002, 5:175-182.
20. Fielding D., Handley S., Duqueno L., Weaver S., Lui S. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 1998, 8:273-287.
21. Kirkman M. Eggs and embryo donation and the meaning of motherhood. Women Health 2003, 38:1-18.
22. Kirkman M. Being a 'real' mum: motherhood through donated eggs and embryos. Womens Stud Int Forum 2008, 31:241-248.
23. Shaw R. The gift-exchange and reciprocity of women in donor assisted conception. Sociol Rev 2007, 55:293-310.
24. Baetens P., Devroey P., Camus M., Van Steirteghem A.C., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Hum Reprod 2000, 15:476-484.
25. Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology Embryo donation for reproductive purposes 2008, Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology, Wellington, New Zealand, Available at, Accessed August 23, 2011. http://www.acart.health.govt.nz/moh.nsf/pagescm/29/$File/guidelines-embryo-donation-nov08.pdf.
26. National Health and Medical Research Council Ethical guidelines on the use of assisted reproductive technology in clinical practice and research 2007, National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Australia.
27. Assisted Human Reproduction Canada. 2007 Section 8 (Consent to Use Regulations)-Guidance. Available at:. Accessed August 23, 2011. http://www.ahrc-pac.gc.ca/v2/legislation/consent-consentement/section8-section8-eng.php.
28. Nachtigall R., Becker G., Friese C., Butler A., MacDougall K. Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertil Steril 2005, 84:431-434.
29. Elford K., Lawrence C., Leader A. Research implications of embryo cryopreservation choices made by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2004, 81:1154-1155.
30. de Lacey S. Parent identity and 'virtual' children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos. Hum Reprod 2005, 20:1661-1669.
31. de Lacey S. Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: fresh insights into patients' thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos. Hum Reprod 2007, 22:1751-1758.
32. Lyerly A., Steinhauser K., Voils C., Namey E., Alexander C., Bankowski B., et al. Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey. Fertil Steril 2010, 93:499-509.
33. Newton C., Fisher J., Feyles V., Tekpetey F., Hughes L., Isacsson D. Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod 2007, 22:3124-3128.