Heuristic evaluation on Augmented Reality courseware for the deaf

Proceedings - 2011 International Conference on User Science and Engineering, i-USEr 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 183-188

  Zainuddin, Norziha Megat Mohd ^a   Zaman, Halimah Badioze ^b   Ahmad, Azlina ^b  

^a MALAYSIA JAPAN INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

augmented reality; deaf; heuristic evaluation; usability; visual informatics

Indexed keywords

COURSEWARE; DEAF; END USERS; HEURISTIC EVALUATION; INSPECTION METHODS; LEARNING SCIENCE; USABILITY; VISUAL INFORMATICS;

AUGMENTED REALITY; INSPECTION;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84857754250     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/iUSEr.2011.6150562     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. R.T. Azuma, "A survey of augmented reality," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 4, 1997, pp. 355-385.
2. D. Yu, et al., "A useful visualization technique: A literature review for augmented reality and its application, limitation and future direction,"in Visual Information Communication, M.L.H. et al., Editor. Springer Science + Business Media. 2010, pp. 311-337.
3. A. Nischelwitzer, et al., eds. "Some aspects of the development of low-cost augmented reality learning environments as examples for future interfaces in technology enhanced learning," ed. C.Stephanidis. 4556, 2007, pp. 728-737.
4. E. Medina, Y.-C. Chen, and S. Weghorst, "Understand biochemistry with augmented reality," in Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, J. Seale, Editor: Chesapeake, VA, 2007, pp. 4235-4239.
5. W. Lui, et al. "Mixed reality classroom - learning form entertainment,"in DIMEA '07. Perth, Western Australia: ACM. 2007.
6. A. Dunser, "Supporting low ability reader with interactive augmented reality," in Annual Review of Cyber Therapy and Telemedicine: Changing the Face of Healthcare. San Diego: Interactive Media Institute. 2008.
7. H. Abas and H. B. Zaman, "Scaffolding models for remedial students in using augmented reality storybook," in International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics. IEEE: Bandung, Indonesia. 2011.
8. R. Ramli and H. B. Zaman, "Designing usability evaluation methodology framework of augmented reality basic reading courseware (AR BACA SindD) for down syndrome learner," in International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics. IEEE: Bandung, Indonesia. 2011.
9. N. M. Zainuddin, H. B. Zaman, and A. Ahmad, "Learning science using AR-Book: A preliminary study on visual needs of deaf learners,"in First International Visual Informatics Conference, IVIC 2009. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: LNCS. 2009.
10. N. M. Zainuddin, H. B. Zaman, and A. Ahmad, "Learning science using AR-Book by blended learning strategies: A case study in preferred visual needs of deaf student," Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2). 2009.
11. D. Passig and S. Eden, "Improving flexible thinking in deaf and hard of hearing children with virtual reality technology," American Annals of the Deaf, 145(3), 2000, pp. 286.
12. J. Nielsen, "Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics,"in CHI'94, ACM: Boston, Massachusetts USA. 1994.
13. M.Y. Ivory and M.A. Hearst, "The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces." ACM Computing Survey, 33(4), 2001, pp. 470-516 (Pubitemid 33720523)
14. W. Hwang and G. Salvendy, "Number of people required for usability evaluation: The 10+2 rule," Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 2010, pp. 130-133.
15. J. Scholtz, Usability evaluation. (2004). [Online]. Available: http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/IADpapers/2004/Usability%20Evaluation-rev1.pdf.
16. th ed., Pearson Education. 2005.
17. J. Nielsen and T.K. Landauer, "A mathematical model of the finding of usability problem," in Human Factors in Computing System (SIGCHI), Amsterdam: ACM. 1993.
18. E. T. Hvannberg, E. L-C. Law, and M. K. Larausdottir, "Heuristic evaluation: Comparing ways of finding and reporting usability problems," Journal of Interacting with Computers, 19, 2007,pp. 225-240.
19. A.Holzinger, "Usability engineering methods for software developers,"in Communications of the ACM, 2005, pp. 71-74.
20. J. Nielsen. (2000) Why you only need to test with 5 users. [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html.
21. J. L. Gabbard, et al. "Usability engineering: Domain analysis activities for augmented reality system," in Proceedings SPIE, San Jose, CA, 2002.
22. E. Folmer, J. V. Gurp, and J. Bosch, "A framework for capturing the relationship between usability and software architecture," Software Process Improvement and Practice, 8(2), 2003, pp. 67-87. (Pubitemid 40290392)
23. th ed.: Pearson Education Limited, 2007.
24. nd International Workshop at the IEEE Virtual Reality 2007, IEEE: Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
25. J. Nielsen and R. Molich, "HE of user interface," in CHI 90 Conference Proceedings, ACM, 1990, pp. 249-256.
26. R. A. Virzi, "Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough? Human Factors, 34, 1992, pp. 457-468.
27. J. R. Lewis, "Sample sizes for usability studies: Additional considerations," Human Factors, 2(36), 1994, pp. 368-378.
28. D. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things. New Your: Doubleday. 1988.
29. B. Tognazzini. (1992). Tog on interface. First principles of interaction design. [Online]. Available: www.asktog.com/
30. J. Nielsen. (2001). Ten usability heuristics. [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/
31. E. H. Tanaka, S. A. Bim, and H. V. D. Rocha, "Comparing accessibility evaluation and usability evaluation in HagaQue," in CLIHC'05, ACM: Cuernavaca, Mexico, 2005, pp. 23-26.
32. nd Panhellenic Scientific Student Conference on Informatics, Related Technologies and Applications. Samos, 2008, pp. 43-54.
33. th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE. Citeseer, 1999.
34. A. Alsumait, "Usability heuristics evaluation for child e-learning applications," Journal of Software, 5(6), 2010, pp. 654-661.
35. D. Squires and J. Preece, "Usability and learning: Evaluating the potential of educational software." Journal of Computers Education, 27(1), 1996, pp. 15-22. (Pubitemid 126358922)
36. D. A. Bowman, et al., 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice, Addison-Wesley. 2005.
37. th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, Greece. 2009.
38. M. Debeve, et al., "Exploring usability and accessibility of an e-learning system for improving computer literacy," in ICTA' 07. Hammamet, Tunisia. 2007.
39. G. Cockton and A. Woolrych, "Understanding inspection methods: Lessons from an assessment of heuristic evaluation," in People and Computers XV, V.A.P.D. Gray, Ed.: Springer-Verlag. 2001, pp. 171-192.
40. Curriculum Development Centre. (2006). Integrated curriculum for secondary schools curriculum specifications, SCIENCE Year 5. [Online]. Available: http://www.ppk.smkdpk.com/hsp/science/kbsr/hsp-sc-y5.pdf.
41. S. M. Yassin, et al. Science Textbook Year 5. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. 2008.
42. thAnnual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 1996.
43. th Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering, A. Holzinger, Ed.:. Graz, Austria. 2008, pp. 31-42.
44. N. Adamo-Villani, "A virtual learning environment for deaf children: Design and evaluation," in Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2006.