Exploring teacher beliefs in teaching EAP at low proficiency levels

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 99-111

  Alexander, Olwyn ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barriers to effective teaching; EAP; Low level learners; Success factors; Teacher beliefs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857737881     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alexander O. Groping in the dark or turning on the light: routes into teaching English for academic purposes. Educating legal english specialists and teacher education in teaching EAP. Proceedings of IALS teacher education symposia, 2004 and 2006 2007, Institute for Applied Language Studies, University of Edinburgh. T. Lynch, J. Northcott (Eds.).
2. Alexander O., Argent S., Spencer J. EAP Essentials: A teacher's guide to principles and practice 2008, Garnet Education, Reading.
3. Argent S., Alexander O. Access EAP: Foundations 2010, Garnet Education, Reading.
4. BALEAP Competency framework for teachers of english for academic purposes 2008, Retrieved 26.04.11 from. http://www.baleap.org.uk/teap/teap-competency-framework.pdf.
5. Barcelos A. Researching beliefs about SLA: a critical review. Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches 2006, 7-34. Springer, New York. A. Barcelos, P. Kalaja (Eds.).
6. Bax S. The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal 2003, 57(3):278-286.
7. Belcher D.D. English for specific purposes: teaching for perceived needs and imagined futures in the worlds of work, study and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly 2006, 40(1):133-156.
8. Biber D., Gray B. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: complexity, elaboration and explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2010, 9(1):2-20.
9. Bloor M., Bloor T. Languages for specific purposes: Practice and theory 1986, Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Occasional Paper 19, Trinity College, Dublin.
10. Borg S. Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice 2006, Continuum, London.
11. Breen M.P. Contemporary paradigms in syllabus design. Part I. Language Teaching 1987, 20(1):81-92.
12. Bruce I. Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis 2008, Continuum, London.
13. Bruce I. Theory and concepts of English for academic purposes 2011, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke.
14. Cook V. Materials for adult beginners from an L2 user perspective. Developing materials for language teaching 2003, 275-290. Continuum, London. B. Tomlinson (Ed.).
15. Cook V. Developing links between second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Handbook of foreign language communication and learning 2009, 139-162. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. K. Knapp, B. Seidlhofer (Eds.).
16. Cortazzi M., Jin L. Cultures of learning: language classrooms in China. Society and the language classroom 1996, 169-203. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. H. Coleman (Ed.).
17. Council of Europe Common european framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment 2001, Available online at, Retrieved 14.11.11. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf.
18. Ding, A., Jones, M., & King, J. (2004). Perfect match? Meeting EAP teachers' needs and expectations in training. Presentation to BALEAP professional issues meeting, teacher training in EAP, University of Essex.
19. Dudley-Evans T., St John M. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Feez S. Text-based syllabus design 1998, AMES, Sydney, NSW.
21. Ferguson G. The global spread of English, scientific communication and ESP: questions of equity, access and domain loss. IBéRICA 2007, 13:7-38.
22. Foley J. Key concepts: scaffolding. ELT Journal 1994, 48(1):101-102.
23. Golombek P.R., Johnson K.E. Narrative inquiry as a mediational space: examining emotional and cognitive dissonance in second-language teachers' development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 2004, 10(3):307-327.
24. Graves K. The language curriculum: a social contextual perspective. Language Teaching 2008, 411(2):147-181.
25. Grundy P. Listening to ourselves. Humanising Language Teaching 2001, 3(6). Retrieved 21.01.11 from. http://www.hltmag.co.uk/nov01/mart1.htm.
26. Hamp-Lyons L. English for academic purposes. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning 2011, Vol. 2:89-105. Routledge, New York.
27. Harwood N. What do we want EAP teaching materials for?. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2005, 4(2):149-161.
28. Howatt A.P.R., Widdowson H.G. A history of English language teaching 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
29. Hyland K. English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book 2006, Routledge, Abingdon, UK.
30. Islam C. Materials for beginners. Developing materials for language teaching 2003, 256-274. Continuum, London. B. Tomlinson (Ed.).
31. Johnson K. Foreign language course design. Handbook of foreign language communication and learning 2009, 309-340. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. K. Knapp, B. Seidlhofer (Eds.).
32. Lave J., Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Mangubhai F., Marland P., Dashwood A., Son J. Similarities and differences in teachers' and researchers' conceptions of communicative language teaching: does the use of an educational model cast a better light?. Language Teaching Research 2005, 9(1):31-66.
34. Pajares M.F. Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research 1992, 62(3):307-332.
35. Phipps S., Borg S. Exploring tensions between teachers' grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System 2009, 37/3:380-390.
36. Richards J.C. Communicative language teaching today 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Sakui K., Gaies S.J. A case study: beliefs and metaphors of a Japanese teacher of English. Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches 2006, 153-170. Springer, New York. A. Barcelos, P. Kalaja (Eds.).
38. Savignon S.J. Beyond communicative language teaching: what's ahead?. Journal of Pragmatics 2007, 39(1):207-220.
39. Schmitt D., Slaght J. Responses to discussion topic beliefs about teaching low level EAP 26th September, 2010. mailto:BALEAP@Jiscmail.ac.uk.
40. Senior R.M. The experience of language teaching 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Swales J. Research genres: Exploration and analysis 2004, CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge.
42. Thompson G. Some misconceptions about communicative language teaching. ELT Journal 1996, 50(1):9-15.
43. Trimble L. English for science and technology: A discourse approach 1985, CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge.
44. Verity D.P. Side affects: the strategic development of professional satisfaction. Sociocultural theory and second language learning 2000, 179-197. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J.P. Lantolf (Ed.).
45. Wells G. The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a 'language-based theory of learning'. Linguistics and Education 1994, 6(1):41-90.
46. Widdowson H.G. The linguistic perspective. Handbook of foreign language communication and learning 2009, 193-218. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. K. Knapp, B. Seidlhofer (Eds.).