Audiovisual interactions depend on context of congruency

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 563-574

  Sarmiento, Beatriz R ^a   Shore, David I ^b   Milliken, Bruce ^b   Sanabria, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Audition; Congruency context; Crossmodal interactions; Multisensory processing; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; TIME PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857694222     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0249-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alink, A., Singer, W., & Muckli, L. (2008). Capture of auditory motion by vision is represented by an activation shift from auditory to visual motion cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 2690-2697. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 2980-07. 2008.
2. Andersen, T. S., Tiippana, K., & Sams, M. (2004). Factors influencing audiovisual fission and fusion illusions. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 301-308. doi: 10. 1016/j. cogbrainres. 2004. 06. 004.
3. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2004. 10. 003.
4. Calvert, G. A., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E. (Eds.). (2004). The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316-321. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193850.
6. Crump, M. J. C., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1523-1532. doi: 10. 1080/17470210902752096.
7. Crump, M. J. C., Vaquero, J. M. M., & Milliken, B. (2008). Context-specific learning and control: The role of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 22-36. doi: 10. 1016/j. concog. 2007. 01. 004.
8. Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 374-380. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2008. 07. 001.
9. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784-1790. doi: 10. 1038/nn1594.
10. Fairhall, S. L., & Macaluso, E. (2009). Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites. European Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 1247-1257. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1460-9568. 2009. 06688. x.
11. Jiménez, L., & Méndez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 236-259. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 25. 1. 236.
12. Klink, P. C., Montijn, J. S., & van Wezel, R. J. A. (2011). Crossmodal duration perception involves perceptual grouping, temporal ventriloquism, and variable internal clock rates. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 219-236. doi: 10. 3758/s13414-010-0010-9.
13. Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20, 219-234. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 20. 2. 219.
14. Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166-174. doi: 10. 3758/BF03197535.
15. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
16. Romei, V., De Haas, B., Mok, R. M., & Driver, J. (2011). Auditory stimulus timing influences perceived duration of co-occurring visual stimuli. Frontiers in Perception Science, 2(215), 1-8. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2011. 00215.
17. Sanabria, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Spence, C. (2007). Spatial attention and audiovisual interactions in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 33, 927-937. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 33. 4. 927.
18. Sanabria, D., Spence, C., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Perceptual and decisional contributions to audiovisual interactions in the perception of apparent motion: A signal detection study. Cognition, 102, 299-310. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2006. 01. 003.
19. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
20. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2000). What you see is what you hear. Nature, 408, 788. doi: 10. 1038/35048669.
21. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2002). A visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 147-152. doi: 10. 1016/S0926-6410(02)00069-1.
22. Shore, D. I., & Simic, N. (2005). Integration of visual and tactile stimuli: Top-down influences require time. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 509-517. doi: 10. 1007/s00221-005-2391-x.
23. Soto-Faraco, S., Spence, C., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Cross-modal dynamic capture: Congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 30, 330-345. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 30. 2. 330.
24. Talsma, D., Doty, T. J., & Woldorff, M. G. (2007). Selective attention and audiovisual integration: Is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration? Cerebral Cortex, 17, 679-690. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/bhk016.
25. Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 400-410. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2010. 06. 008.
26. Walker, J. T., & Scott, K. J. (1981). Auditory-visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones, and gaps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1327-1339. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 7. 6. 1327.
27. Watkins, S., Shams, L., Josephs, O., & Rees, G. (2007). Activity in human V1 follows multisensory perception. NeuroImage, 37, 572-578.