Safety of interactive robotics-learning from accidents

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 221-227

  Malm, Timo ^a   Viitaniemi, Juhani ^a   Latokartano, Jyrki ^b   Lind, Salla ^a   Venho Ahonen, Outi ^a   Schabel, Jari ^a  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Accident; Crushing; Hazard; Robot; Safety

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ACCIDENTS; AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; CRUSHING; HAZARDS; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

ACCIDENT STATISTIC; ACTIVE MOVEMENTS; CURRENT PRACTICES; DENSITY STATISTICS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI); HUMAN SUPERVISION; INTERACTIVE ROBOTICS; SEVERE ACCIDENT;

EDUCATIONAL ROBOTS;

EID: 84857628408     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-010-0057-8     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ABB Application Manual (2004-2008) Motion coordination and supervision RobotWare 5.0 document ID: 3HAC18154-1 revision: F ABB
2. Accident Report Database of Safety Administration (TAPS) of Finland (2009) In Finnish. https://eportti.tietopalvelut.com/taps/TapsFrame_alku.asp (accessed 29.7.2009)
3. Alvarado ML (2002) A risk assessment of human-robot interface operations to control the potential of injuries/losses at the xyz manufacturing company. The Graduate College University of Wisconsin-Stout, May 2002
4. EN ISO 10218-1 (2006) Robots for industrial environment-safety requirements-part 1: robot. CEN, 30 p
5. EN 60204-1 (2006) Safety of machinery. Electrical equipment of machines. Part 1: general requirements. CEN. 216 p
6. Federation of Accident Insurance Institutions. http://www.tvl.fi/
7. Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A (2010) Physical human robot interaction: dependability and safety. Videos related to tests. http://www.phriends.eu/videos.htm (accessed 8.1.2010)
8. Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Strohmayr M, Frommberger M, Hirzinger G (2008) Injury evaluation of human-robot impacts. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Pasadena, CA, USA, May 19-23, 2008, pp 2203-2204
9. Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Frommberger M, Hirzinger G (2008) The role of the robot mass and velocity in physical human-robot interaction-part II: constrained blunt impacts. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Pasadena, CA, USA, May 19-23, 2008
10. Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) (2006) Resilience engineering. Concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing, Hampshire
11. ISO/DIS 10218-2 (2008) Draft standard. Robots for industrial environment-safety requirements-part 2: robot system and integration. ISO, 94 p
12. Karwowski W, Järvinen J, Rahimi M (1994) Human aspects of industrial robotics. In: Salvendy G, Karwowski W (eds) Design of work and development of personnel in advanced manufacturing. Wiley, New York, pp 493-534
13. Klez TA (2003) Inherently safer design-its scope and future. Trans IChemE, 81 part B, pp 401-405
14. Kuivanen R (1995) Methodology for simultaneous robot system safety design. VTT publications 219, 142 p + app 13 p
15. Malm T (ed) (2008) Safety of collaborating robotics. In Finnish. Robotics society of Finland, 116 p + att 72 p
16. Malm T, Toivonen S, Laine E (2007) Safety issues related to industrial robots collaborating with humans. In: Safety of industrial automated systems (SIAS2007), Tokyo, Japan, pp 216-221
17. Robotics Society of Finland (2008) Industrial robot statistics in Finland 2007. In Finnish, 3 p. http://www.roboyhd.fi/ (accessed 8.1.2010)
18. The IFR Statistical Department, study World Robotics. http://www.worldrobotics.org/downloads/2008_Pressinfo_english.pdf (accessed 10.3.2010)