Robots in society, society in robots: Mutual shaping of society and technology as a framework for social robot design

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 439-450

  Šabanović, Selma ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Mutual shaping of technology and society; Social analysis of robotics; Technological determinism

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; DESIGN; MACHINE DESIGN; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS; MUTUAL SHAPING; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONS; SOCIETY AND TECHNOLOGIES; TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITY; TECHNOLOGICAL DETERMINISM; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84857577704     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-010-0066-7     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bartneck C, Kulic D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):71-81
2. Boyer L (2004) The robot in the kitchen: the cultural politics of care-work and the development of in-home assistive technology. Middle-States Geogr 37:72-79
3. Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B (2009) Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot 1(4):319-330
4. Brooks R (2002) Flesh and machines: how robots will change us. Vintage Books, New York
5. Buchanan R (1998) Wicked problems in design thinking. In: Margolin V, Buchanan R (eds) The idea of design: a design issues reader. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 5-21
6. Caporael LR (2001) Evolutionary psychology: toward a unifying theory and a hybrid science. Ann Rev Psychol 52:607-628
7. Dautenhahn K, Ogden B, Quick T (2002) From embodied to socially embedded agents: implications for interaction-aware robots. Cognit Syst Res 3:397-428
8. DiSalvo C, Nourbakhsh I, Holstius D, Akin A, Louw A (2008) The neighborhood networks project: a case study of critical engagement and creative expression through participatory design. In: Proceedings of PDC 2008, pp 41-50
9. Forlizzi J (2007) How robotic products become social products: an ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. In: HRI'07: proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. ACM, New York, pp 129-136
10. Forlizzi J, DiSalvo C, Gemperle F (2004) Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Hum-Comput Interact 19:25-59
11. Forsythe D (2001) Studying those who study us: an anthropologist in the world of artificial intelligence. Stanford University Press, Stanford
12. Fortun K, Fortun M (2005) Scientific imaginaries and ethical plateaus in contemporary U.S. toxicology. Am Anthropol 107(1):43-54
13. Fujimura J (2003) Future imaginaries: genome scientists as so-ciocultural entrepreneurs. In: Goodman AH (ed) Genetic nature/culture: anthropology and science beyond the two-culture divide. University of California Press, Ewing, pp 176-195
14. Gates B (2007) A robot in every home. Sci Am 296(1):58-65
15. Gregory J, Hyysalo S, Kangasoja J (2003) Imaginaries at work: conceptualizing technology beyond individual projects. In: Society for Social Studies of Science Conference. Atlanta, GA
16. Ito K (2007) Astroboy's birthday: robotics and culture in contemporary Japanese society. In: The second East Asian science, technology, and society conference
17. Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41:223-244
18. Jasanoff S (2007) States of Knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, New York
19. Kidd C, Breazeal C (2007) A robotic weight loss coach. In: The national conference on artificial intelligence, pp 1985-1986
20. Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Viking Penguin, New York
21. Kusuda Y (2006) How Japan sees the robotics for the future: observation at the world expo 2005. Indust Robot 33(1):11-18
22. MacKenzie D, Wajcman J (1999) Introductory essay: the social shaping of technology. In: MacKenzie D, Wajcman J (eds) The social shaping of technology. Open University Press, Philadelphia, pp 3-27
23. Matarić M, Eriksson J, Feil-Seifer D, Winstein C (2007) Socially assistive robotics for post-stroke rehabilitation. J NeuroEng Rehab 4(5)
24. Meisner E, Šabanović S, Isler V, Caporael L, Trinkle J (2009) ShadowPlay: a generative model for nonverbal human-robot interaction. In: HRI'09: IEEE/ACM international conference on human-robot interaction, La Jolla, CA
25. Michalowski M, Šabanović S, DiSalvo C, Busquets D, Hiatt L, Melchior N, Simmons R (2005) Socially distributed perception: grace plays social tag at AAAI 2005. Auton Robots 22(4)
26. Miwa T, Yabuno K (2002) The book of Wabot: the evolution of robot and the future of people. Chuokoron-Shinsha, Inc, Tokyo
27. Moravec H (1999) Robot: mere machine to transcendent mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford
28. Movellan J, Tanaka F, Fortenberry B, Aisaka K (2005) The RUBI/QRIO project: origins, principles, and first steps. In: 4th IEEE international conference on development and learning
29. Naditz A (2009) Anybots QA telepresence robot. Telemed e-Health 15(2):205-207
30. Pickering A (1995) The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
31. Robertson J (2007) Robo sapiens japanicus: humanoid robots and the posthuman family. Crit Asian Stud 39(3):369-398
32. Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Ono T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Android as a telecommunication medium with a human-like presence. In: HRI'07: proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. ACM, New York, pp 193-200
33. Suchman L (2001) Human/machine reconsidered
34. Suchman L (2007) Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
35. Takanishi A, Yabuno K (2004) The book of Wabot 4: what are humanoid robots? Chuokoron-Shinsha, Inc, Tokyo
36. Tanaka F, Cicourel A, Movellan J (2007) Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104(46):17,054-17,958
37. Taylor C (2002) Modern social imaginaries. Public Cult 14(1):91-124
38. Verran H (1998) Re-imagining land ownership in Australia. Post-colon Stud 1(2):237-254
39. Volti R (2006) Society and technological change. Macmillan, London
40. Šabanović S, Meisner E, Caporael L, Isler V, Trinkle J (2009) Outside-in design for interdisciplinary HRI research. In: AAAI spring symposium on experimental design for real-world systems. Stanford, CA
41. Šabanović S, Michalowski M, Simmons R (2006) Robots in the wild: observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab. In: AMC 2006: proceedings of the international conference on advanced motion control
42. Wada K, Shibata T (2009) Social effects of robot therapy in a care house-change of social network of the residents for one year. J Adv Comput Intell Intell Inform 13(4):386-392
43. Weingart P (2008) How robust is socially robust knowledge? In: Carrier M, Howard D, Kourany J (eds) The challenge of the social and the pressure of practice science and values revisited. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 131-145
44. Weng Y, Chen C, Sun C (2009) Toward the human-robot coexistence society: on safety intelligence for next generation robots. Int J Soc Robot 1:267-282
45. William R, Edge D (1996) The social shaping of technology. Res Policy 25:856-899
46. Winner L (1977) Autonomous technology: technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press, Cambridge
47. Yorita A, Hashimoto T, Kobayashi H, Kubota N (2009) Remote education based on robot edutainment. Prog Robot 44:204-213
48. Young J, Hawkins R, Sharlin E, Igarashi T (2009) Toward acceptable domestic robots: applying insights from social psychology. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):95-108