Chasing the change - Theoretical frameworks of policy change and stability with a focus on the case of European Union forest-relevant nature conservation policy;Dem wandel auf der spur - Theoretische ansätze zur analyse von politikwandel und -stabilität mit Fokus auf das beispiel waldbezogener EU-Naturschutzpolitik

Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung

Volumn 182, Issue 11-12, 2011, Pages 215-230

  Sotirov, Metodi ^a   Borrass, Lars ^a   Winkel, Georg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Advocacy Coalition Framework; Argumentative Discourse Analysis; European forest and nature protection policy; European multi level governance; Natura 2000; Policy analysis; Policy change; Policy paradigms; Veto Player Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857555896     PISSN: 00025852     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. APELDOORN, R. C. van, R.W. KRUK, I. M. BOUWMA, F. FERRANTI, G. DE BLUST und A. R. J. SIER (2009): Natura 2000 - Information and communication on the designation and management of Natura 2000 sites. Main Report 1. Alterra: Wageningen.
2. ARTS, B. (2011): Forests policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends. Forest Policy and Economics (in Druck; online verfügbar unter: doi:10.1016/j.forpol. 2010.12.003).
3. BANDELOW, N. C. (2003a): Policy-Lernen und politische Veränderung. In: SCHUBERT, KLAUS /BANDELOW, N. C. (Hrsg.): Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse. Munchen: Oldenbourg, S. 289-330.
4. BANDELOW, N. C. (2003b): Lemtheoretische AnsäTze in der Policy-Forschung. In: MAIER, MATTHIAS L.; NULLMEIER, F. und PRITZLAFF, T. (Hrsg.): Politik als Lernprozess? Opladen: Leske + Budrich. S. 98-121.
5. BENNETT, C. J. und M. HOWLETT (1992): The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences. 25. S. 275-294.
6. BENZ, A. (2009): Politik in Mehrebenensystemen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden.
7. BEUNEN, R. und J. R. DE VRIES (2011): The governance of Natura 2000 sites: the importance of initial choices in the organisation of planning processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. S. 1-19.
8. Börzel, T. und A. BUZOGANY (2010): Environmental organisations and the Europeanisation of public policy in Central and Eastern Europe: the case of biodiversity governance. 19, 5. S. 708-735.
9. BOUWMA, I. M., D. A. KAMPHORST, R. BEUNEN und R. C. VAN APPELDOORN (2008): Natura 2000 Benchmark. A comparative analysis of the discussions on Natura 2000 management issues. Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu rapporten 90.
10. CAPANO, G. (2009): Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 11, 1. S.7-31.
11. CASHORE, B. und M. HOWLETT (2007): Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry. American Journal of Political Science. 51, 3. S. 532-551.
12. CHILLA, T. (2007): The political relevance of discourses on space. The example of the EU nature conservation policy. Erdkunde. 61, 1. S. 13-25. (Pubitemid 46592256)
13. CHRISTOPHERSEN, T. (2001): Natura 2000 und Forstwirtschaft. Der Einfluss der Forstverbande auf die Forstpolitik der EU. BDF Fachverband Forst e.V. Schriftenreihe - Band 11. RrWA Verlag: Augsburg.
14. FAIRBRASS, J. und A. JORDAN (2004): Multi-level Governance and Environmental Policy. In: BACHE, I. and FLINDERS, M. (Hrsg.) (2004). Multi-level Governance. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
15. FAIRBRASS, J. und A. JORDAN (2001): Protecting biodiversity in the European Union: national barriers and European opportunities? Journal of European Public Policy. 8,4. S. 499-518.
16. FISCHER, F. (2003): Refraining Public Policy. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
17. FISCHER, F. und J. FORESTER (Hrsg.) (1993): The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press: Durham.
18. Füg, OUVER C. (2009): The Advocacy Coalition Framework Goes to Europe: An American Theory and its Application Across the Pond. Prepared for the Annual Convention of the Political Studies Association, Panel 115. (online veFügbar unter: http://www.psa.ac.uk/2009/ pps/Fueg.pdf).
19. GANGHOF, S. (2003): Promises and Pitfalls of Veto Player Analysis. Swiss Political Science Review. 9, 2. S. 1-25.
20. GIESSEN, L. (2011): Reviewing empirical explanations of policy change: Options for its analysis and future fields of research. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung. 182. Jahrgang. 2011. Heft 11/12. S. 248-259.
21. HAJER, M. (1993): Discourse coalitions and the institutionalizations of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain. In: FISCHER, F. und FORESTER, J. (Hrsg.) (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press: Durham. S. 43-76.
22. HAJER, M. (1997): The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
23. HAJER, M. (2004): Argumentative Diskursanalyse. Auf der Suche nach Koalitionen, Praktiken und Bedeutung. In: KELLER, R.; HIRSELAND, A.; SCHNEIDER, W. und VIEHÖVER, W. (Hrsg.). Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse Bd. 2. Forschungspraxis. VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden. S. 271-298.
24. HAJER, M. (2005): Coalition, Practices and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE. In: HOWARTH, D. und TORFING, J. (Hrsg.). Discourse Theory in European Politics. Identity, Policy and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan: London.
25. HAJER, M. (2011): Webpage of MAARTEN HAJER: Available from: http://www.maartenhaier.nl/ [Accessed 06 July 2011].
26. HALL, P. A. (1989): The Political Power of Economic Ideas - Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
27. HALL, P. A. (1993): Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State. Comparative Politics. 25, 3. S. 239-255.
28. HALL, P. A. (2006): Systematic process analysis: when and how to use it. European Management Review. 3. S. 24-31.
29. HIEDANPAEAE, J. (2002): European-wide conservation versus local well-being: the reception of the Natura 2000 Reserve Network in Karvia, SW-Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning. 61. S. 113-123.
30. HlRSCHL, B. (2008): Erneuerbare Energien-Politik: Eine Multi-Level Policy-Analyse mit Fokus auf den deutschen Strommarkt. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden.
31. HOOGHE, L. und G. MARKS (2003): Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance. American Political Science Review. 97, 2. S. 233-243. (Pubitemid 36737845)
32. HOWLETT, M. und M. RAMESH (2003): Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press: Toronto. 2. Edition.
33. HOWLETT, M. und B. CASHORE (2009): The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 11, 1. S. 33-46.
34. HUMPHREYS, D. (2009): Discourse as ideology: Neoliberalism and the limits of international forest policy. Forest Policy and Economics. 11, 5-6. S. 319-325.
35. JOHN, P. (2003): Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change? The Policy Studies Journal. 31. S. 381-498.
36. JUNGER, F. ST. (2002): Umsetzung der FFH-Richtlinie und die Forstwirtschaft. Dissertation. BDF Schriftenreihe - Band 12. RIWA-Verlag: Augsburg.
37. KELLE, U. und C. ERZBERGER (2000): Qualitative und quantitative Methoden: kein Gegensatz. In: FLICK, U. (2000): Qualitative Forschung: ein Handbuch. S. 299-309. Rororo: Reinbek.
38. KEULARTZ, J. und G. LEISTRA (Hrsg.). (2008): Legitimacy in European Nature Conservation Policy: Case Studies in Multilevel Governance. Springer: Dordrecht.
39. KNILL, Ch. (2008): Europäische Umweltpolitik: Steuerungsprobleme und Regulierungsmuster im Mehrebenensystem. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden.
40. KNILL, CH., K. SCHULZE und Y. TOSUN (2010): Politikwandel und seine Messung in der vergleichenden StaatstäTigkeitsforschung: Konzeptionelle Probleme und mögliche Alternativen. Politische Vierteljahresschriften. 51. S. 409-432.
41. KRUK, R.W., G. DE BLUST, R. C. VAN APELDOORN, I. M. BOUWMA und A. J. R. SIER (2009): Natura 2000 - Information and communication on the designation and management of Natura 2000 sites. Main Report 2. Alterra: Wageningen.
42. KUHN, T. (1962): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
43. LEDOUX, L., S. CROOKS, A. JORDAN und R. K. TURNER (2000): Implementing EU Biodiversity Policy: UK Experiences. Land Use Policy. 17. S. 257-268.
44. Lijphart, A. (1999): Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
45. MARKS, G., L. HOOGHE und K. BLANK (1996): European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies. 34, 3. S. 341-378.
46. NEWIG, J. und O. FRITSCH (2009): Environmental Governance: Participatory, Multi-Level - and Effective? Environmental Policy and Governance. 19. S. 197-214.
47. PAAVOLA, J. (2009): Interplay of Actors, Scales, Frameworks and Regimes in the Governance of Biodiversity. Environmental Policy and Governance. 19. S. 148-158.
48. PARSONS, W. (1995): Public Policy. An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA.
49. PIattoni, S. (2009): Multi-level Governance: a Historical and Conceptual Analysis. European Integration. 31, 2. S. 163-180.
50. RAUSCHMEYER, R, S. VAN DEN HOVE und Th. KOETZ (2009): Participation in EU biodiversity governance: how far beyond rhetoric?. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 27. S. 42-58.
51. SABATIER, P. (2007): The Need for Better Theories. In: SABATIER, P., (Hrsg..), Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press, Boulder (Co.). Zweite Ausgabe. S.3-17.
52. SABATIER, P. A. und N. PELKEY (1987): Incorporating multiple actors and guidance instruments into models of regulatory policy making: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Administration & Society. 19, 2. S. 236-263.
53. SABATIER, P. A. und S. MCLAUGHLIN (1988): Belief Congruence of Interest Group Elites with Their Constituencies. American Politics Quarterly. 16. S. 61-98.
54. SABATIER, P. A. und H. C. JENKINS-SMITH (1993): The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Assessment, Revisions, and Implications for Scholars and Practitioners. In: SABATIER, P. A. und JENKINS-SMITH, H. C. (Hrsg.), Policy Change and Learning, An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder (Colorado). S. 211-235.
55. SABATIER, P. A. und H. C. JENKINS-SMITH (1999): The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment. In: SABATIER, P., (Hrsg.) Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press, Boulder (Co.). S. 117-166.
56. SABATIER, P. A. und C. WEIBLE (2007): The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications. In: SABATIER, P. (Hrsg.), Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press, Boulder (Co.). Zweite Ausgabe. S. 189-220.
57. SAUER, A. (2005): European nature conservation policy: challenges for local implementation in Germany. In: TRESS, B.; TRESS, G.; FRY, G. und OPDAM, P. (Hrsg). From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning. S. 173-189. Springer: Dordrecht.
58. SAUER, A. (2006): Europäische Naturschutzpolitik. Die Rolle der lokalen und regionalen Akteure bei der Umsetzung der FFH-Richtlinie in Deutschland. Oekom: Munchen.
59. SCHARPF, F.W (2000): Interaktionsformen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden.
60. SCHLAGER, E. (2007): A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories and Models of the Policy Process. In: SABATIER, P., (Hrsg.), Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press, Boulder (Co.). Zweite Ausgabe. S. 293-319.
61. SCHLAGER, E. und W BLOMQUIST (1996): A Comparison of Three Emerging Theories of the Policy Process. Political Research Quarterly. 49. S. 651-672. (Pubitemid 126312804)
62. SCHMIDT, V. A. und C. M. RADAELLI (2004): Policy change and discourse in Europe: conceptual and methodological issues. West European Politics. 27, 2. S. 183-210. (Pubitemid 38672621)
63. SLEPCEVIC, R. (2009): The judicial enforcement of EU law through national courts: possibilities and limits. Journal of European Public Policy. 16, 3. S. 378-394.
64. SOTIROV, M. und M. MEMMLER (2011): The Advocacy Coalition Framework in Natural Resource Policy Studies - Recent Experiences and Further Prospects. Forest Policy and Economics (in Druck, online verfiigbar unter: doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.007).
65. STEWART, J. (2006): Value Conflict and Policy Change. Review of Policy Research. 23, 1. S. 183-195. (Pubitemid 43337726)
66. STOLL-KLEEMANN, S. (2001): Reconciling opposition to protected areas management in Europe: the German Experience. Environment. 43, 5. S. 32-44. (Pubitemid 32496883)
67. SUMARES, D. und T. FIDELIS (2011): Natura 2000 and the narrative nature of nature: a case for critical discourse analysis. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences. 8, 1. S. 53-68.
68. TOP, M. VAN DEN und M. VAN DER ZOUWEN (2000). Europees natuurbeleid in Nederland: een pionier die zichzelf in de weg loopt (European nature conservation policies in the Netherlands: a pioneer unable to implement its own ambitions). Landschap. 17, 2. S. 81-96.
69. TSEBELIS, G. (1995): Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science. 25, 3. S. 289-325.
70. TSEBELIS, G. (2000): Veto Players and Institutional Analysis. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration. 13, 4. S. 441-474.
71. TSEBELIS, G. (2002): Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
72. WEBER, N. und T. CHRISTOPHERSEN (2002). The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process. Forest Policy and Economics. 4. S. 1-12. (Pubitemid 34463419)
73. WINKEL, G. (2007): Waldnaturschutzpolitik in Deutschland. Bestandaufnahmen, Analysen und Entwurf einer Story-Line. Remagen: Kessel
74. WINKEL, G. und M. SOTIROV (2011): An obituary for National Forest Programmes? Analysing and learning from the strategic use of "new modes of governance" in Bulgaria and Germany. Forest Policy and Ecomomics 13, 2. S. 143-154.
75. WURZEL, K.W. (2008): European Union Environmental Policy and Natura 2000: From Adoption to Revision. S. 259-282. In: KEULARTZ, J. and LEISTRA, G. (Hrsg.). (2008): Legitimacy in European Nature Conservation Policy: Case Studies in Multilevel Governance. Springer: Dordrecht.
76. Zohlnhöfer, R. (2009): How politics matter when policies change: understanding policy change as a political problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 11,1. S. 97-115.