A descriptive model of visual scanning

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 35-42

  Conversy, Stéphane ^a   Hurter, Christophe ^b   Chatty, Stéphane ^a  

^a ENAC   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

Design rationale; Infovis; Visual design; Visualization

Indexed keywords

COMMON LANGUAGES; DESCRIPTIVE MODEL; DESIGN RATIONALE; ELEMENTARY OPERATIONS; INFOVIS; VISUAL DESIGN; VISUAL SCANNING; VISUAL TASKS;

ERRORS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VISION; VISUALIZATION;

DESIGN;

EID: 84857536357     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2110192.2110198     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Accot, J. and Zhai, S. 1997. Beyond Fitts' law: models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI '97. ACM, New York, NY, 295-302.
2. Amar, R., Stasko, J., A Knowledge Task-Based Framework for Design and Evaluation of Information Visualizations, Proc. of IEEE InfoVis '04, 2004, pp. 143-149. (Pubitemid 40449139)
3. Anderson, J. R., Matessa, M., & Lebiere, C. (1997). ACT-R: A theory of higher level cognition and its relation to visual attention. Human Computer Interaction, 12(4), 439-462. (Pubitemid 127715458)
4. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 111, (4). 1036-1060. (Pubitemid 39375086)
5. Appert, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Mackay, W. (2004) Context Matters: Evaluating Interaction Techniques with the CIS Model. In Proceedings of HCI 2004, Leeds, UK. Springer Verlag, pages 279-295.
6. Atkins, M. S., Moise, A., and Rohling, R. 2006. An application of eyegaze tracking for designing radiologists' workstations: Insights for comparative visual search tasks. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 3, 2 (Apr. 2006), 136-151.
7. Bertin, J. (1967) Sémiologie Graphique - Les diagrammes -les réseaux - les cartes. Gauthier-Villars et Mouton & Cie, Paris. Réédition de 1997, EHESS.
8. Card, S.K., Mackinlay, J.D., Shneiderman, B., Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. San Francisco, California: Morgan-Kaufmann, (1999)
9. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. 1980. The Keystroke-Level Model for user performance time with interactive systems. CACM 23, 7 (Jul. 1980), 396-410. (Pubitemid 11433615)
10. Casner, S. M. 1991. Task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations. ACM Trans. Graph. 10, 2 (Apr. 1991), 111-151.
11. Cleveland, W., McGill, R., Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, (1984)
12. Crowe, E. C. and Narayanan, N. H. 2000. Comparing interfaces based on what users watch and do. In Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. ETRA '00. ACM, New York, NY, 29-36.
13. Dragicevic, P. and Huot, S. 2002. SpiraClock: a continuous and non-intrusive display for upcoming events. In Extended Abstracts of CHI '02. ACM, 604-605.
14. Furnas, G. W. 1997. Effective view navigation. In Proc. of CHI '97. ACM, New York, NY, 367-374.
15. Grau, J.Y.; Nobel, J.; Guichard, L.; Gawinoski, G. "Dynastrip": a time-line approach for improving the air traffic picture of ATCOS. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2003. DASC'03. 22(1), pp 5.E.1 - 51-11, IEEE.
16. Green, T.R.G (1989). Cognitive dimensions of notation. In People and computers V, Cambridge University Press, pp 443-460.
17. Johansen, S. A. and Hansen, J. P. 2006. Do we need eye trackers to tell where people look? In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems) CHI '06. ACM, 923-928.
18. MacKay, W. E. 1999. Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 6, 4 (Dec. 1999), 311-340.
19. Mackinlay, J. 1999. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. In Readings in information Visualization: Using Vision To Think, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 66-82.
20. Mackinlay, J., Hanrahan, P., and Stolte, C. 2007. Show Me: Automatic Presentation for Visual Analysis. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6, 1137-1144. (Pubitemid 350076582)
21. Munzner, T. A Nested Process Model for Visualization Design and Validation. In IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 921-928, 2009.
22. Rayner, K. Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, Vol. 124, No. 3, 372-422. (Pubitemid 128461792)
23. Riedl, M. O. and St. Amant, R. 2002. Toward automated exploration of interactive systems. In Proc of IUI '02. ACM, 135-142.
24. Salvucci, D. D. and Anderson, J. R. 2001. Automated eyemovement protocol analysis. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 16, 1 (Mar. 2001), 39-86.
25. St. Amant, R. & Riedl, M.O. A perception/action substrate for cognitive modeling in HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 1 (2001), 15-39.
26. Tufte, E. R. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 2nd ed., 2001.
27. Ware, C. Visual Thinking for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.
28. Wilkinson, L., The Grammar of Graphics. New York: Springer Verlag (1999).
29. Zhang, J., Norman, D. 1995. A Representational Analysis of Numeration Systems. In Cognition, 57. 271-295.
30. Zhang, J. 1997. The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving. In Cognitive science, 21(2), 179-217. (Pubitemid 127165267)
31. Zhou, M. X. and Feiner, S. Visual task characterization for automated visual discourse synthesis, Proc of CHI'98, p.392-399, ACM, 1998