An Application of Eyegaze Tracking for Designing Radiologists' Workstations: Insights for Comparative Visual Search Tasks

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 136-151

  Atkins, M Stella ^a   Moise, Adrian ^a   Rohling, Robert ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cognition; Comparative visual search; Design; Eyegaze tracking; Human Factors; Human computerinteraction; Measurement; Radiologist productivity; User interface evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015778214     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1141897.1141902     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ashman, C. J., Yu, J. S., and Wolfman, D. 2000. Satisfaction of search in osteoradiology. Am. J. Roentgenol. 175, 541-544.
2. Asl, Applied Science Laboratories. 2000. ASL Eye Tracker Manual, www.asl.com.
3. Berbaum, K. S., Franken, E. A., Dorfman, D. D., Miller, E. M., Caldwell, R. T., Kuehn, D. M., and Berbaum, M. L. 1998. Role of faulty decision making in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. Academic Radiol. 5, 1, 9-19.
4. Berbaum, K. S., Brandser, E. A., Franken, E. A., Dorfman, D. D., Cadwell, R. T., and Krupinski, E. A. 2001. Gaze dwell time on acute trauma injuries missed because of satisfaction of search. Academic Radiol. 8, 4, 304-314.
5. Duchowski, A. T. 2000. A breadth-first survey of eye tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computer 1, 1-16.
6. Findlay, J. M. and Kapoula, Z. 1992. Scrutinization, spatial attention, and the spatial programming of saccadic eye movements. Quart. J. Exp. Psycho. 45A, 633-648.
7. Freedman, E. G. and Sparks, D. L. 2000. Coordination of the eyes and head: Movement kinematics. Exp. Brain. Res. 131, 22-32.
8. Hu C. H., Kundel, H. L., Nodine, C. F., KRupinski, E. A., and Toto, L. C. 1994. Searching for bone fractures: A comparison with pulmonary nodule search. Academic Radiol. 1, 25-32.
9. Humphrey, G. K. and Lupker, S. J. 1993. Codes and operations in picture matching. Psychol. Res. 55, 237-247.
10. Inamdar, I. and Pomplun, M. 2003. Comparative search reveals the tradeoff between eye movements and working memory use in visual tasks. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston. 599-604.
11. Krupinski, E. A. 2000. The importance of perception research in medical imaging. Radiat. Med. 18, 6, 329-334.
12. Krupinski, E. A. and Lund, P. J. 1997. Differences in time to interpretation for evaluation of bone radiographs on monitors and film. Academic Radiol. 4, 177-182.
13. Krupinski, E. A., Kundel, H. L., Judy, P. F., and Nodine, C. F. 1998. The medical image perception society-key issues for image perception research. Radiology 209, 611-612.
14. Krupinski, E. A., Berger, W., Dallas, W., and Roehrig, H. 2004. Pulmonary nodule detection: What features attract attention? In Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 5372. 122-127.
15. Kundel, H. L. 2004. Reader Error, Object Recognition, and visual search. Keynote speech. In Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 5372. 1-11.
16. Kundel, H. L. and Nodine, C. F. 2004. Modeling visual search during mammogram viewing. In Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 5372. 110-115.
17. Kundel, H. L., Nodine, C. F., Thickman, D., and Toto L. 1987. Searching for lung nodules: A comparison of human performance with random and systematic scanning models. Invest. Radiol. 22, 417-422.
18. Kundel, H. L., Nodine, C. F., and Carmody, D. 1978. Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest. Radiol. 13, 3, 175-181.
19. Manning, D. and Ethell, S. C. 2002. Lesion conspicuity and AFROC performance in pulmonary nodule detection. In Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 4686. 300-311.
20. Manning, D., Ethell, S. C., and Donovan, T. 2004. Categories of observer error from eye tracking and AFROC data. In Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 5372. 90-99.
21. Mello-Thoms, C., Nodine, C. F., and Kundel, H. L. 2002. What attracts the eye to the location of missed and reported breast cancers? In Proceedings of the IEEE Eye Tracking Research and Applications Conference, ETRA 2002. 111-117.
22. Medical Image Perception Society, Mips. 2005. http://www.radiology.arizona.edu/krupinski/mips/index.html.
23. Moise, A. 2003. Designing better user interfaces for radiology workstations, in Computing Science. PhD thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, V5A 1S3, Canada.
24. Moise, A. and Atkins, M. S. 2002. Workflow Oriented Hanging Protocols for Radiology Workstation. In Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 4685. 189-199.
25. Moise, A. and Atkins, M. S. 2004a. Interaction techniques for radiology workstations: Impact on users'productivity. In Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 5371. 16-22.
26. Moise, A. and Atkins, M. S. 2004b. Design Requirements for Radiology Workstations. J. Digital Imaging 17, 2, 92-99.
27. Moise, A. and Atkins, M. S. 2005. Designing better radiology workstations: Impact of two user interfaces on interpretation errors and user satisfaction. J. Digital Imaging 18, 2, 109-115.
28. Moise, A., Atkins, M. S., and Rohling, R. 2005. Evaluating different radiology workstation interaction techniques with radiologists and laypersons. J. Digital Imaging 18, 2, 116-130.
29. Nodine, C. F. and Kundel, H. L. 1987. Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. Radiographics 7, 1241-1250.
30. Nodine, C. F. and Kundel, H. L. 1990. A Visual Dwell Algorithm Can Aid Search and Recognition of Missed Lung Nodules in Chest Radiographs. In Visual Search 2. D. B. T. Francis, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam. 399-406.
31. Nodine, C. F., Kundel, H. L., Lauver, S. C., and Toto, L. C. 1996. The nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses. In Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 2712. 89-94.
32. Nodine, C. F., Kundel, H. L., Toto, L. C., and Krupinski, E. A. 1992. Recording and analyzing eye-position data using a microcomputer workstation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 24, 475-485.
33. Nodine, C. F., Kundel, H. L., Mello-Thoms, C., and Weinstein, S. P. 2001a. Role of computer-assisted visual search in mammo-graphic interpretation. In Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 4324. 52-55.
34. Nodine, C. F., Mello-Thoms, C., Weinstein, S. P., Kundel, H. L., Conant, E. F., Heller-Savoy, R. E., Rowlings, S. E., and Birnbaum, J. A. 2001b. Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers: An eye-position analysis. Radiology 221, 122-129.
35. Pomplun, M. and Ritter, H. A. 1999. Three-Level Model Of Comparative Visual search. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 543-548.
36. Pomplun, M., Reingold, E., and Shen, J. 2001a. Investigating the visual span in comparative search: The effects oftask difficulty and divided attention. Cognition 81, B57-B67.
37. Pomplun, M., Sichelschmidt, L., Wagner, K., Clermont, T., Rickheit, G., and Ritter, H. 2001B. Comparative Visual search: A difference that makes a difference. Cognitive Science 25, 1, 3-36.
38. Raskin, J. 2000. The Humane Interface, Addison Wesley, Reading.
39. Rayner, K. 1998. Eye Movements In Reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 124, 3, 372-422.
40. Rogers, L. F. 2000. Keep looking: satisfaction of search. Am. J. Roentgenol. 175, 287.
41. Salvucci, D. and Goldberg, J. 2000. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In Proceedings of IEEE Eye Tracking Research and Applications Conference, ETRA 2000. 71-78.
42. SCAR 2004. Society For Computer Applications in Radiology (SCAR) Newsletter, Fall 2004. SCAR Expert Hotline. 16, 4. WARE, C. 2004. Information Visualization: Perception for Design, 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufman.
43. Yang, G.-Z., Dempere-Marco, L., Hu, X.-P., and Rowe, A. 2002. Visual Search: Psychophysical Models and Practical applications. Image Vision Comput. 20, 273-287.