Altered and asymmetric default mode network activity in a " hypnotic virtuoso" : An fMRI and EEG study

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 393-400

  Lipari, S ^a   Baglio, F ^a   Griffanti, L ^a,b   Mendozzi, L ^a   Garegnani, M ^a   Motta, A ^c   Cecconi, P ^a   Pugnetti, L ^a  

^a IRCCS FONDAZIONE DON CARLO GNOCCHI   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^c Villa San Benedetto Hospital   (Italy)

Author keywords

Default mode network; EEG; FMRI; Hypnosis; Resting state

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNESIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CASE REPORT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMOTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; HYPNOTIC VIRTUOSO;

BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE NET;

EID: 84857499938     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Amodio D.M., Devine P.G. Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91(4):652-661. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.652.
2. Aubert A.E., Verheyden B., Beckers F., Tack J., Vandenberghe J. Cardiac autonomic regulation under hypnosis assessed by heart rate variability: Spectral analysis and fractal complexity. Neuropsychobiology 2009, 60(2):104-112. 10.1159/000239686.
3. Aupee A.M., Desgranges B., Eustache F., Lalevee C., de la Sayette V., Viader F., et al. Voxel-based mapping of brain hypometabolism in permanent amnesia with PET. NeuroImage 2001, 13(6 Pt. 1):1164-1173. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0762.
4. Barber T.X. A comprehensive three-dimensional theory of hypnosis. Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives 1999, 21-48. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardeña-Buelna, S. Amigo (Eds.).
5. Barrett D. Fantasizers and dissociaters: Two types of high hypnotizables, two different imagery styles. Hypnosis and imagination 1996, 123-135. Baywood, Amityville, NY. R.G. Kunsendorf, N.P. Spanos, B. Wallace (Eds.).
6. Buckner R.L., Andrews-Hanna J.R., Schacter D.L. The brain's default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2008, 1124:1-38. 10.1196/annals.1440.011.
7. Buckner R.L., Wheeler M.E. The cognitive neuroscience of remembering. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2(9):624-634. 10.1038/35090048.
8. Burgess P.W., Scott S.K., Frith C.D. The role of the rostral frontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory: A lateral versus medial dissociation. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(8):906-918.
9. Cardeña E. The phenomenology of deep hypnosis: Quiescent and physically active. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2005, 53(1):37-59. 10.1080/00207140490914234.
10. Cardeña E., Lehmann D., Faber P.L., Jönsson P., Milz P., Pascual-Marqui R.D., et al. EEG sLORETA functional imaging during hypnotic arm levitation and voluntary arm lifting. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis 2012, 60(1):31-53.
11. Cavallaro F.I., Cacace I., Del Testa M., Andre P., Carli G., Pascalis De., et al. Hypnotizability-related EEG alpha and theta activities during visual and somesthetic imageries. Neuroscience Letters 2010, 470(1):13-18. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.044.
12. Cox R.E., Bryant R.A. Advances in hypnosis research: Methods, designs, and contributions of intrinsic and instrumental hypnosis. The oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice 2008, 311-336. Oxford University Press. M.R. Nash, A.J. Barnier (Eds.).
13. Crawford H.J., Gruzelier J.H. A midstream view of the neuropsychophysiology of hypnosis: Recent research and future directions. Contemporary hypnosis research 1992, 227-266. Guilford Press, New York. E. Fromm, M. Nash (Eds.).
14. Croft R.J., Williams J.D., Haenschel C., Gruzelier J.H. Pain perception, hypnosis and 40Hz oscillations. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 2002, 46(2):101-108.
15. Crone J.S., Ladurner G., Höller Y., Golaszewski S., Trinka E., Kronbichler M. Deactivation of the default mode network as a marker of impaired consciousness: An FMRI study. PLoS One 2011, 6(10):e26373.
16. De Pascalis V., Ray W.J., Tranquillo I., D'Amico D. EEG activity and heart rate during recall of emotional events in hypnosis: Relationships with hypnotizability and suggestibility. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 1998, 29(3):255-275.
17. Egner T., Delano M., Hirsch J. Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. Neuroimage 2007, 35(2):940-948.
18. Egner T., Jamieson G., Gruzelier J. Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe. NeuroImage 2005, 27(4):969-978. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.002.
19. Engel A.K., Fries P. Beta-band oscillations--signalling the status quo?. Current Opinion Neurobiology 2010, 20(2):156-165.
20. Elliott R., Deakin B. Role of the orbitofrontal cortex in reinforcement processing and inhibitory control: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies in healthy human subjects. International Review of Neurobiology 2005, 65:89-116. 10.1016/S0074-7742(04)65004-5.
21. Faymonville M.E., Boly M., Laureys S. Functional neuroanatomy of the hypnotic state. Journal of Physiology, Paris 2006, 99(4-6):463-469. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.018.
22. Faymonville M.E., Laureys S., Degueldre C., DelFiore G., Luxen A., Franck G. Neural mechanisms of antinociceptive effects of hypnosis. Anesthesiology 2000, 92(5):1257-1267.
23. Ferry A.T., Ongur D., An X., Price J.L. Prefrontal cortical projections to the striatum in macaque monkeys: Evidence for an organization related to prefrontal networks. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 2000, 425(3):447-470.
24. Fingelkurts A.A., Fingelkurts A.A. Persistent operational synchrony within brain default-mode network and self-processing operations in healthy subjects. Brain and Cognition 2011, 75(2):79-90. 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.11.015.
25. Fingelkurts A.A., Fingelkurts A.A., Kallio S., Revonsuo A. Hypnosis induces a changed composition of brain oscillations in EEG: A case study. Contemporary Hypnosis 2007, 24(1):3-18.
26. Fingelkurts A.A., Fingelkurts A.A., Kallio S., Revonsuo A. Cortex functional connectivity as a neurophysiological correlate of hypnosis: An EEG case study. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(7):1452-1462. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.018.
27. Fox M.D., Raichle M.E. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007, 8(9):700-711. 10.1038/nrn2201.
28. Fox M.D., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Corbetta M., Van Essen D.C., Raichle M.E. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(27):9673-9678. 10.1073/pnas.0504136102.
29. Fudge J.L., Breitbart M.A., Danish M., Pannoni V. Insular and gustatory inputs to the caudal ventral striatum in primates. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 2005, 490(2):101-118. 10.1002/cne.20660.
30. Greicius M.D., Krasnow B., Reiss A.L., Menon V. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100(1):253-258. 10.1073/pnas.0135058100.
31. Gruzelier J.H. Frontal functions, connectivity and neural efficiency underpinning hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility. Contemporary Hypnosis 2006, 23(1):15-32. 10.1002/ch.35.
32. Halsband U., Mueller S., Hinterberger T., Strickner S. Plasticity changes in the brain in hypnosis and meditation. Contemporary Hypnosis 2009, 26(4):194-215. 10.1002/ch.386.
33. Hilgard E.R. Divided consciousness 1986, Wiley, New York. expanded ed.
34. Isotani T., Lehmann D., Pascual-Marqui R.D., Kochi K., Wackermann J., Saito N. EEG source localization and global dimensional complexity in high- and low- hypnotizable subjects: A pilot study. Neuropsychobiology 2001, 44(4):192-198.
35. Kallio S., Revonsuo A. Hypnotic phenomena and altered states of consciousness: A multilevel framework of description and explanation. Contemporary Hypnosis 2003, 20(3):111-164.
36. Kallio S., Revonsuo A. Altering the state of the altered state debate: Reply to commentaries. Contemporary Hypnosis 2005, 22(1):46-55.
37. Kallio S., Revonsuo A., Hämäläinen H., Markela J., Gruzelier J. Anterior brain functions and hypnosis: A test of the frontal hypothesis. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2001, 49(2):95-108.
38. Katayama H., Gianotti L.R., Isotani T., Faber P.L., Sasada K., Kinoshita T., et al. Classes of multichannel EEG microstates in light and deep hypnotic conditions. Brain Topography 2007, 20(1):7-14. 10.1007/s10548-007-0024-3.
39. Kosslyn S.M., Thompson W.L., Costantini-Ferrando M.F., Alpert N.M., Spiegel D. Hypnotic visual illusion alters color processing in the brain. The American Journal of Psychiatry 2000, 157(8):1279-1284.
40. Long X.Y., Zuo X.N., Kiviniemi V., Yang Y., Zou Q.H., Zhu C., et al. Default mode network as revealed with multiple methods for resting-state functional MRI analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2008, 171(2):349-355. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.03.021.
41. Lynn S.J., Kirsch I. Essentials of clinical hypnosis: An evidence-based approach 2006, Americal Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
42. McConkey K.M., Barnier A.J. High hypnotisability: Unity and diversity in behaviour and experience. The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical experimental and clinical issues 2004, 61-84. Brunner-Routledge, London. M. Heap, R.J. Brown, D.A. Oakley (Eds.).
43. McGeown W.J., Mazzoni G., Venneri A., Kirsch I. Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18(4):848-855. 10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.001.
44. Mendelsohn A., Chalamish Y., Solomonovich A., Dudai Y. Mesmerizing memories: Brain substrates of episodic memory suppression in posthypnotic amnesia. Neuron 2008, 57(1):159-170. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.022.
45. Naish P.L. Hypnosis and hemispheric asymmetry. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19(1):230-234. 10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.003.
46. Oakley D.A., Halligan P.W. Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13(6):264-270. 10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.004.
47. O'Doherty J.P. Lights, camembert, action! the role of human orbitofrontal cortex in encoding stimuli, rewards, and choices. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2007, 1121:254-272. 10.1196/annals.1401.036.
48. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): Technical details. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 2002, 24(Suppl. D):5-12.
49. Pekala R.J. Quantifying consciousness: An empirical approach 1991, Plenum Press, New York.
50. Pekala R.J., Kumar V.K., Maurer R., Elliott-Carter N., Moon E., Mullen K. Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: I. Implications for understanding hypnotism. The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 2010, 52(4):275-290.
51. Rainville P., Hofbauer R.K., Bushnell M.C., Duncan G.H., Price D.D. Hypnosis modulates activity in brain structures involved in the regulation of consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14(6):887-901. 10.1162/089892902760191117.
52. Raz A., Fan J., Posner M.I. Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(28):9978-9983. 10.1073/pnas.0503064102.
53. Raz A., Kirsch I., Pollard J., Nitkin-Kaner Y. Suggestion reduces the stroop effect. Psychological Science. A Journal of the American Psychological Society/APS 2006, 17(2):91-95. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01669.x.
54. Raz A., Shapiro T., Fan J., Posner M.I. Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of stroop interference. Archives of General Psychiatry 2002, 59(12):1155-1161.
55. Rolls E.T. The functions of the orbitofrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition 2004, 55(1):11-29. 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00277-X.
56. Scheeringa R., Fries P., Petersson K.M., Oostenveld R., Grothe I., Norris D.G., et al. Neuronal dynamics underlying high- and low-frequency EEG oscillations contribute independently to the human BOLD signal. Neuron 2011, 69(3):572-583.
57. Smith E.E., Kosslyn S.M. Cognitive psychology: Mind and brain 2006, Prentice Hall.
58. Tart C.T. Self-reported scales of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1970, 18(2):105-125. 10.1080/00207147008415909.
59. Terhune D.B., Cardena E. Differential patterns of spontaneous experiential response to a hypnotic induction: A latent profile analysis. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19(4):1140-1150. 10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.006.
60. van den Heuvel M.P., Mandl R.C., Kahn R.S., Hulshoff Pol H.E. Functionally linked resting-state networks reflect the underlying structural connectivity architecture of the human brain. Human Brain Mapping 2009, 30(10):3127-3141. 10.1002/hbm.20737.
61. VandeVusse L., Hanson L., Berner M.A., White Winters J.M. Impact of self-hypnosis in women on select physiologic and psychological parameters. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing: JOGNN/NAACOG 2010, 39(2):159-168. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01103.x.
62. Weitzenhoffer A.M., Hilgard E.R. Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale: Form C 1962, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
63. Williams J.D., Gruzelier J.H. Differentiation of hypnosis and relaxation by analysis of narrow band theta and alpha frequencies. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2001, 49(3):185-206.
64. Yang H., Long X.Y., Yang Y., Yan H., Zhu C.Z., Zhou X., et al. Amplitude of low frequency fluctuation within visual areas revealed by resting-state functional MRI. NeuroImage 2007, 36(1):144-152. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.054.
65. Yeung N., Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D. The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 2004, 111(4):931-959. 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.939.
66. Zang Y., Jiang T., Lu Y., He Y., Tian L. Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. NeuroImage 2004, 22(1):394-400. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.030.