Conditions for efectively deriving a q-matrix from data with non-negative matrix factorization

EDM 2011 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 41-50

  Desmarais, Michel C ^a  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOWER AND UPPER BOUNDS; NONNEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; PARTIAL AUTOMATION; SIMULATED DATA; SIMULATION APPROACH; SUPPORTIVE TOOLS; TEST PERFORMANCE; VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUE;

BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION; DATA MINING; FACTORIZATION;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

EID: 84857495687     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Barnes, T. 2006. Evaluation of the q-matrix method in understanding student logic proofs. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Florida Arti-cial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Melbourne Beach, Florida, USA, May 11-13, 2006, G. Sutcliffe and R. Goebel, Eds. AAAI Press, 491-496.
2. Berry, M. W., Browne, M., Langville, A. N., Pauca, V. P., and Plemmons, R. J. 2007. Algorithms and applications for approximate nonnegative matrix factorization. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 52, 1, 155 - 173.
3. Cen, H., Koedinger, K. R., and Junker, B. 2005. Automating cognitive model improvement by A* search and logistic regression. In Educational Data Mining: Papers from the 2005 AAAI Workshop., J. Beck, Ed. Technical Report WS-05-02. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press, 47-53.
4. Cen, H., Koedinger, K. R., and Junker, B. 2006. Learning factors analysis - A general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 8th International Conference, ITS 2006, Jhongli, Taiwan, June 26-30, 2006, Proceedings. 164-175.
5. CollegeBoard. 2011. Sat subject tests practice questions. http://sat.collegeboard.com/practice/sat-subject-test-preparation (consulted on April 2, 2011).
6. Desmarais, M. C. and Pelczer, I. 2010. On the faithfulness of simulated student performance data. In 3rd Inter- national Conference on Educational Data Mining EDM2010, R. S. J. de Baker, A. Merceron, and P. I. Pavlik, Eds. www.educationaldatamining.org, 21-30.
7. Lee, D. D. and Seung, H. S. 1999. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401, 6755, 788-791.
8. Schachtner, R., Poppel, G., and Lang, E. 2010. A nonnegative blind source separation model for binary test data. Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, IEEE Transactions on 57, 7, 1439 -1448.
9. Tatsuoka, K. K. 1983. Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 20, 345-354.
10. Winters, T., Shelton, C., Payne, T., and Mei, G. 2005. Topic extraction from item level grades. In American Association for Artificial Intelligence 2005 Workshop on Educational Datamining.