Effects of normal and abnormal visual experience on the development of opposing aftereffects for upright and inverted faces

Developmental Science

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 194-203

  Robbins, Rachel A ^a,d   Maurer, Daphne ^a,c   Hatry, Alexandra ^b   Anzures, Gizelle ^b   Mondloch, Catherine J ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; FACE; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VISION DISORDERS;

EID: 84857442688     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01116.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anzures, G., Mondloch, C., & Lackner, C. (2009). Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects in 8-year-olds and adults. Child Development, 80, 178-191.
2. Baudouin, J.-Y., Gallay, M., Durand, K., & Robichon, F. (2010). The development of perceptual sensitivity to second-order facial relations in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 195-206.
3. Bestelmeyer, P., Jones, B., DeBruine, L., Little, A., Perrett, D., Schneider, A., Welling, L., & Conway, C. (2008). Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. Cognition, 107, 353-363.
4. de Haan, M., Pascalis, O., & Johnson, M.H. (2002). Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 199-209.
5. Geldart, S., Mondloch, C., Maurer, D., de Schonen, S., & Brent, H. (2002). The effects of early visual deprivation on the development of face processing. Developmental Science, 5, 490-501.
6. Gilaie-Dotan, S., Gelbard-Sagiv, H., & Malach, R. (2010). Perceptual shape sensitivity to upright and inverted faces is reflected in neuronal adaptation. NeuroImage, 50, 383-395.
7. Guo, X., Oruc, I., & Barton, J. (2009). Cross-orientation transfer of adaptation for facial identity is asymmetric: a study using contrast-based recognition thresholds. Vision Research, 49, 2254-2260.
8. Halit, H., de Haan, M., & Johnson, M. (2003). Cortical specialization for face processing: face-sensitive event-related potential components in 3- and 12-month-old infants. NeuroImage, 19, 1180-1193.
9. Hayden, A., Bhatt, R.A., Zieber, N., & Kangas, A. (2009). Race-based perceptual asymmetries underlying face processing in infancy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 270-275.
10. Jaquet, E., Rhodes, G., & Hayward, W. (2007). Opposite aftereffects for Chinese and Caucasian faces are selective for social category information and not just physical face differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1457-1467.
11. Jeffery, L., McKone, E., Haynes, R., Firth, E., Pellicano, E., & Rhodes, G. (2010). Four- to six-year-old children use norm-based coding in face-space. Journal of Vision, 10, 1-19.
12. Kelly, D.J., Quinn, P.C., Slater, A.M., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., Ge, L., & Pascalis, O. (2005). Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Developmental Science, 8, F31-F36.
13. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C., Maurer, D., & Brent, H.P. (2001). Early visual experience and face processing. Nature, 410, 890. Correction: 2001, 412, 786.
14. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. (2003). Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1108-1112. Erratum: 2003, 6, 1329.
15. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. (2004). Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychological Science, 15, 762-768.
16. Little, A.C., DeBruine, L.M., & Jones, B.C. (2005). Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 272, 2283-2287.
17. Little, A., DeBruine, L., & Jones, B. (2011). Category-contingent face adaptation for novel colour categories: contingent effects are seen only after social or meaningful labelling. Cognition, 118, 116-122.
18. Little, A., DeBruine, L., Jones, B., & Waitt, C. (2008). Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species. Cognition, 106, 1537-1547.
19. Mondloch, C., Robbins, R., & Maurer, D. (2010). Discrimination of facial features by adults, 10-year-olds and cataract-reversal patients. Perception, 39 (2), 184-194.
20. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T., Clifford, C.W., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558-566.
21. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T., Jaquet, E., Winkler, C., & Clifford, C.W. (2004). Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanisms. Current Biology, 14, 1-20.
22. Robbins, R., McKone, E., & Edwards, M. (2007). Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 33 (3), 570-592.
23. Robbins, R.A., Nishimura, M., Mondloch, C.J., Lewis, T.L., & Maurer, D. (2010). Deficits in sensitivity to spacing after early visual deprivation in humans: a comparison of human faces, monkey faces, and houses. Developmental Psychobiology, 52, 775-781.
24. Rotshtein, P., Hensen, R.N., Treves, A., Driver, J., & Dolan, R.J. (2005). Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 107-113.
25. Schweinberger, S., Zäske, R., Walther, C., Golle, J., Kovács, G., & Wiese, H. (2010). Young without plastic surgery: perceptual adaptation to the age of female and male faces. Vision Research, 50, 2570-2577.
26. Short, L.A., & Mondloch, C.J. (2010). The importance of social factors is a matter of perception. Perception, 39, 1562-1564.
27. Short, L., Hatry, A., & Mondloch, C. (2011). The development of norm-based coding and race-specific face prototypes: an examination of 5- and 8-year-olds' face space. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 338-357.
28. Susilo, T., McKone, E., & Edwards, M. (2010). Solving the upside-down puzzle: why do upright and inverted face aftereffects look alike? Journal of Vision, 10, 1-16.
29. Watson, T., & Clifford, C. (2003). Pulling faces: an investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect. Perception, 32, 1109-1116.
30. Watson, T., & Clifford, C. (2006). Orientation dependence of the orientation-contingent face aftereffect. Vision Research, 46, 3422-3429.
31. Webster, M.A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural face categories. Nature, 428 (6982), 557-561.
32. Webster, M.A., & MacLin, O.H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 647-653.
33. Yamashita, J.A., Hardy, J.L., De Valois, K.K., & Webster, M.A. (2005). Stimulus selectivity of figural face aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 420-437.
34. Yin, R.K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81 (1), 141-145.
35. Young, A.W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D.C. (1987). Configural information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.