Category-contingent face adaptation for novel colour categories: Contingent effects are seen only after social or meaningful labelling

Cognition

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 116-122

  Little, Anthony C ^a   DeBruine, Lisa M ^b   Jones, Benedict C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aftereffects; Categories; Experience; Face processing; Prototypes

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE; FACE ASYMMETRY; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL SYSTEM; COLOR; FACE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ADULT; COLOR; FACE; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952782274     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bestelmeyer P.E.G., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M., Little A.C., Perrett D.I., Schneider A., et al. Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. Cognition 2008, 107(1):353-365.
2. Bestelmeyer P.E.G., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M., Little A.C., Welling L.L.M. Face aftereffects suggest interdependent processing of expression and sex and of expression and race. Visual Cognition 2010, 18(2):255-274.
3. Enquist M., Arak A. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 1994, 372:169-172.
4. Fox C.J., Barton J.J.S. What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Research 2007, 1127(1):80-89.
5. Giese M.A., Leopold D.A. Physiologically inspired neural model for the encoding of face spaces. Neurocomputing 2005, 65:93-101.
6. Goldstein A.G., Chance J.E. Effects of training on japanese face recognition - Reduction of the other-race effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1985, 23(3):211-214.
7. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(6):223-233.
8. Hills P.J., Elward R.L., Lewis M.B. Identity adaptation is mediated and moderated by visualisation ability. Perception 2008, 37(8):1241-1257.
9. Jaquet E., Rhodes G. Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34(1):101-112.
10. Johnstone R.A. Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition. Nature 1994, 372:172-175.
11. Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M., Little A.C. Adaptation reinforces preferences for correlates of attractive facial cues. Visual Cognition 2008, 16(7):849-858.
12. Jones B.C., Feinberg D.R., Bestelmeyer P.E.G., Debruine L.M., Little A.C. Adaptation to different mouth shapes influences visual perception of ambiguous lip speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17(4):522-528.
13. Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J., Maurer D., Brent H.P. Early visual experience and face processing. Nature 2001, 410:890.
14. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:89-94.
15. Leopold D.A., Rhodes G., Muller K.M., Jeffery L. The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B - Biological Sciences 2005, 272(1566):897-904.
16. Little A.C., DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C. Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B - Biological Sciences 2005, 272(1578):2283-2287.
17. Little A.C., DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C., Waitt C. Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species. Cognition 2008, 106(3):1537-1547.
18. Loffler G., Yourganov G., Wilkinson F., Wilson H.R. FMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(10):1386-1390.
19. Malpass R., Kravitz J. Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969, 13:330-334.
20. Pascalis O., Coleman M., Campbell R. Face recognition across different species: Effects of inversion and instruction. Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive - Current Psychology of Cognition 1998, 17(4-5):1067.
21. Pascalis O., de Haan M., Nelson C.A. Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life?. Science 2002, 296(5571):1321-1323.
22. Pascalis O., Scott L.S., Kelly D.J., Shannon R.W., Nicholson E., Coleman M., et al. Plasticity of face processing in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(14):5297-5300.
23. Perrett D.I., Lee K.J., Penton-Voak I.S., Rowland D.R., Yoshikawa S., Burt D.M., et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 1998, 394:884-887.
24. Posner M.I., Keele S.W. On genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 77:353-363.
25. Rhodes G., Halberstadt J., Brajkovich G. Generalization of mere exposure effects in social stimuli. Social Cognition 2001, 19:57-70.
26. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Jaquet E., Winkler C., Clifford C.W.G. Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanisms. Current Biology 2004, 14(23):2119-2123.
27. Rotshtein P., Henson R.N.A., Treves A., Driver J., Dolan R.J. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:107-113.
28. Rowland D.A., Perrett D.I. Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 1995, 15(5):70-76.
29. Sangrigoli S., Pallier C., Argenti A.M., Ventureyra V.A.G., de Schonen S. Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science 2005, 16(6):440-444.
30. Tiddeman B.P., Burt D.M., Perrett D.I. Prototyping and transforming facial texture for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2001, 21:42-50.
31. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1991, 43:161-204.
32. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 2004, 428:557-561.
33. Webster M.A., MacLin O.H. Figural after-effects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1999, 6:647-653.
34. Yamashita J.A., Hardy J.L., De Valois K.K., Webster M.A. Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(3):420-437.