Design and usability of heuristic-based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis

Health Expectations

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 32-48

  Durand, Marie Anne ^a   Wegwarth, Odette ^b   Boivin, Jacky ^c   Elwyn, Glyn ^a  

^a Harding Center for Risk Literacy ^*

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amniocentesis; Decision making; Decision support; Fast and frugal; Heuristics; Prenatal diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNIOCENTESIS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AMNIOCENTESIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84857427966     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00651.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Stacey D et al. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Decision Making, 2007; 27: 554-574.
2. Dijksterhuis A, Bos MW, Nordgren LF, van Baaren RB. On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 2006; 311: 1005-1007.
3. Wilson TD, Schooler JW. Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991; 60: 181-192.
4. Elwyn G, Kreuwel I, Durand MA et al. How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map. Patient Education and Counseling, 2010; Epub ahead of print.
5. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Review). The Cochrane Library, 2006; 4: 1-110.
6. Estabrooks C, Goel V, Thiel E, Pinfold P, Sawka C, Williams I. Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2001; 6: 170-182.
7. Molenaar S, Sprangers MA, Postma-Schuit FC et al. Feasibility and effects of decision aids. Medical Decision Making, 2000; 20: 112-127.
8. Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM et al. Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technology Assessment, 1999; 3: 1-156.
9. Bowen DJ, Allen JD, Vu T, Johnson RE, Fryer-Edwards K, Hart A. Theoretical foundations for interventions designed to promote informed decision making for cancer screening. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2006; 32: 202-210.
10. Elwyn G, Stiel M, Durand MA, Boivin J. The design of patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2010; Epub ahead of print.
11. Durand MA, Stiel M, Boivin J, Elwyn G. Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. Patient Education and Counseling, 2008; 71: 125-135.
12. O'Connor AM, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Laupacis A, Elmslie T, Drake E. The effects of an 'explicit' values clarification exercise in a woman's decision aid regarding postmenopausal hormone therapy. Health Expectations, 1999; 2: 21-32.
13. Wilson TD, Lisle DJ, Schooler JW, Hodges SD, Klaaren KJ, LaFleur SJ. Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1993; 19: 331-339.
14. Souchek J, Stacks JR, Brody B et al. A trial for comparing methods for eliciting treatment preferences from men with advanced prostate cancer: results from the initial visit. Journal of Medical Care, 2000; 2: 161-165.
15. Rutten-van Molken MP, Bakker M, Hidding A, van Doorslaer EK, van der Linden S. Methodological issues of patient utility measurement. Journal of Medical Care, 1995; 33: 922-937.
16. Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 1996; 103: 650-669.
17. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, the ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
18. Dougherty MR, Franco-Watkins AM, Thomas R. Psychological plausibility of the theory of probabilistic mental models and the fast and frugal heuristics. Psychological Review, 2008; 115: 199-213.
19. Kaplan BJ, Shayne VT. Unsafe sex: decision-making biases and heuristics. AIDS Education and Prevention, 1993; 5: 294-301.
20. Brighton H, Gigerenzer G. How heuristics exploit uncertainty. In: Todd PM, Gigerenzer G, Group TAR (eds) Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. New York: Oxford University Press, in press.
21. Martignon L, Katsikopoulos KV, Woike JK. Categorization with limited resources: a family of simple heuristics. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, in press.
22. Beilock SL, Carr TH, MacMahon C, Starkes JL. When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2002; 8: 6-16.
23. Johnson JG, Raab M. Take the first: option generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003; 91: 215-229.
24. Pitt MA, Myung IJ, Zhang S. Toward a method for selecting among computational models for cognition. Psychological Review, 2002; 109: 472-491.
25. Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G. The recognition heuristic: how ignorance makes us smart. In: Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, the ABC Research Group (eds) Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999: 37-58.
26. Borges B, Goldstein DG, Ortmann A, Gigerenzer G. Can ignorance beat the stock market? In: Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, the ABC Research Group (eds) Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999: 59-72.
27. Geman SE, Bienenstock E, Doursat R. Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation, 1992; 4: 1-58.
28. Foster M, Sober E. How to tell when simpler, more unified, or less ad hoc theories will provide more accurate predictions. British Journal of Philosophical Science, 1994; 45: 1-35.
29. Brighton H. Robust inference with simple cognitive models. In: Lebiere C, Wray R (eds) Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Cognitive Science Principles Meet AI-hard Problems Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium. (AAAI Tech. Rep. No. SS-06-03, pp. 17-22). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 2006.
30. Fischer JE, Steiner F, Zucol F et al. Use of simple heuristics to target macrolide prescription in children with community-acquired pneumonia. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 2002; 156: 1005-1008.
31. Pozen MW, D'Agostino RB, Selker HP, Sytkowski PA, Hood WB. A predictive instrument to improve coronary-care-unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1984; 310: 1273-1278.
32. Gaudry P, Grange G, Lebbar A et al. Fetal loss after amniocentesis in a series of 5, 780 procedures. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 2008; 23: 217-221.
33. Tabor A, Philip J, Madsen M, Bang J, Obel EB, Norgaard-Pedersen B. Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet, 1986; 7: 1287-1293.
34. Asch A. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy. American Journal of Public Health, 1999; 89: 649-657.
35. Green JM, Hewison J, Bekker HL, Bryant LD, Cuckle HS. Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment, 2004; 8: 1-128.
36. Wegwarth O, Elwyn G. Fast & frugal models for designing decision support tools: helpful companions or bad underminers. 2009, submitted.
37. Gigerenzer G. Why heuristics work. Perspective on Psychological Science, 2008; 3: 20-29.
38. Goldstein D. The less-is-more Effect in Inference. Unpublished Master's Thesis: University of Chicago, Chicago, 1994.
39. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ, 2006; 333: 417.
40. Evans R, Elwyn G, Edwards A, Watson E, Austoker J, Grol R. Toward a model for field-testing patient decision-support technologies: a qualitative field-testing study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2007; 9: e21.
41. Holloway I. Qualitative Research in Health Care. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2005.
42. Cotton D, Gresty K. Reflecting on the think-aloud method for evaluating e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2006; 37: 45-54.
43. Davison GC, Vogel RS, Coffman SG. Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1997; 65: 950-958.
44. Ericsson KA, Simon AS. Protocol Analyses, Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1984.
45. Fonteyn M, Fisher A. Use of think aloud method to study nurses' reasoning and decision making in clinical practice settings. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 1995; 27: 124-128.
46. Funkesson KH, Anbacken EM, Ek AC. Nurses' reasoning process during care planning taking pressure ulcer prevention as an example. A think-aloud study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2007; 44: 1109-1119.
47. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000.
48. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 2000; 320: 114-116.
49. Durand MA, Boivin J, Elwyn G. A review of decision support technologies for amniocentesis. Human Reproduction Update, 2008; 14: 659-668.
50. Plain English Campaign. How to write in plain English. Plain English Campaign.
51. Cutts M. The Plain English Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
52. Durand MA, Stiel M, Boivin J, Elwyn G. Information and decision support need of parents considering amniocentesis: a qualitative study of pregnant women and health professionals. Health Expectations, 2009; in press.
53. Hunt LM, De Voogd KB, Castaneda H. The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making. Patient Education and Counseling, 2005; 56: 303-312.
54. St-Jacques S, Grenier S, Charland M, Forest JC, Rousseau F, Legare F. Decisional needs assessment regarding Down syndrome prenatal testing: a systematic review of the perceptions of women, their partners and health professionals. Prenatal Diagnosis, 2008; 28: 1183-1203.
55. Galesic M, Cesario J, Gigerenzer G. Take-the-best approach to decision aids. 30th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Philadelphia, 2008.
56. Dolan JG, Frisina S. Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. Medical Decision Making, 2002; 22: 125-139.