Nanotechnology and the Products of Inherited Regulation

Journal of Law and Society

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 93-112

  Stokes, Elen ^a,b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857380285     PISSN: 0263323X     EISSN: 14676478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00572.x     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. R.A. Posner, Catastrophe: Risk and Response (2004) 8
2. G.E. Marchant, 'The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and the Law' (2011) 7 International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology 19-33.
3. Windeyer J in Mount Isa v. Pusey 125 CLR 383, at 395.1970
4. G.V. Calster, 'Regulating Nanotechnology in the European Union' (2006) Nanotechnology Law & Business 359-372
5. D. Friedman, 'Does Technology Require New Law?' (2001) 25 Harvard J. of Law & Public Policy 71-85.
6. British Standards Institute (BSI), Vocabulary - Nanoparticles, Publicly Available Specification 71 (2005) 2.
7. M. Ratner and D. Ratner, Nanotechnology: A Gentle Introduction to the Next Big Idea (2003).
8. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Nanotechnology Consumer Products Inventory
9. Cientifica, Global Nanotechnology Funding 2011 (2011).
10. K. Donaldson and C.A. Poland, 'Nanotoxicology: New Insights into Nanotubes' 4 Nature Nanotechnology 708-10;2009
11. K. Donaldson et al., 'Review: Carbon Nanotubes: A Review of Their Properties in Relation to Pulmonary Toxicology and Workplace Safety' (2006) 92 Toxicological Sciences 5-22.
12. G. Bhabra et al., 'Nanoparticles can cause DNA damage across a cellular barrier' (2009) 4 Nature Nanotechnology 876-83.
13. Others note that the focus on risk and safety is a narrow one: see M. Lee, 'Risk and Beyond: EU Regulation of Nanotechnology' (2010) 6 European Law Rev. 799-821
14. C. Groves, 'Nanotechnology, Contingency and Finitude' (2009) 3 NanoEthics 1-16
15. R.G. Lee, 'Look at Mother Nature on the Run in the Twenty-First Century: Responsibility, Research and Innovation' (2012) Transnational Environmental Law
16. L.C. Abbott and A.D. Maynard, 'Exposure Assessment Approaches for Engineered Nanomaterials' (2010) 30 Risk Analysis 1634-44.
17. T. Thomas et al., 'Moving Toward Exposure and Risk Evaluation of Nanomaterials: Challenges and Future Directions' (2009) 1 Wiley Interdisciplinary Revs.: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology , at 427. 426-33
18. ETC Group, 'Nanotech Product Recall Underscores Need for Nanotech Moratorium: Is the Magic Gone?' press release, 7 April 2006.
19. European Parliament (EP), Report on the Proposal for a Directive on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (Recast), 15 June 2010, A7-0196/2010, Amendment 88; EP Debate No. 9, 10 July 2010, Explanation of Votes, MEP Robert Rochefort; for examples outside the EU, see International Center for Technology Assessment, Citizen Petition to the United States Food and Drug Administration: Petition Requesting FDA Amend its Regulations for Products Composed of Engineered Nanoparticles Generally and Sunscreen Drug Products Composed of Engineered Nanoparticles Specifically, filed 17 May 2006; Australian Education Union Victoria, Council Resolution adopted 13 May 2011
20. EP Debate No. 4, 28 September 2006, MEP Hiltrud Breyer.
21. EP Resolution on Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials, P6_TA0328.2009
22. MEP David Hammerstein Mintz.
23. See, for example, Commission, Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Nanomaterials in REACH and CLP, CA/90/2009
24. Commission, Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials COM(2008) 366 final, 4, 8; also EP Debate
25. Regulation (EC) No. 178laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority, and laying down procedures in matters of food safety [2002] OJ L31/1, Article 2.2002
26. Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 on Cosmetic Products, OJ L342/59, Article 2(1)(a).2009
27. also see Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) OJ: 396/1: Article 1(3) imposes a duty of care on manufacturers and suppliers to ensure that the substances they manufacture, supply or use do not adversely affect human health or the environment.2006
28. Commission, Commission Staff Working Document: Accompanying Document to the Communication on 'Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials' SEC(2008
29. Commission, Decision Relating to the Setting Up of a Consumers' Consultative Committee 73/306/EEC [1973] L28318.
30. Commission, Consumer Protection and Information Policy: First Report para. 11.1977
31. Council, Resolution on a Preliminary Programme of the European Economic Community for a Consumer Protection and Information Policy OJ C92/2.1975
32. For example, Council Directive 74/409/EEC on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to honey [1974] OJ L221/10; Council Directive 75/726/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning fruit juices and certain similar products OJ L311/40.1975
33. For a useful overview, see S. Weatherill, EU Consumer Law and Policy (2005
34. Commission, Consumer Protection and Information Policy: Second Report (1979) 9.
35. Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering, Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (2004) 69
36. An Overview of the Framework of Current Regulation affecting the Development and Marketing of Nanomaterials: A Report for the DTI (2006)
37. E. Stokes, 'Regulating Nanotechnologies: Sizing Up the Options' (2009) 29 Legal Studies 281-304.
38. R. Sassatelli, 'Virtue, Responsibility and Consumer Choice: Framing Critical Consumerism' in Consuming Cultures, Global Perspectives: Historical Trajectories, Transnational Exchanges, eds. J. Brewer and F. Trentmann (2006)
39. D. Stolle et al., 'Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation' (2005) 26 International Political Sci. Rev. 245-69.
40. Commission, Product Safety: Ensuring the Safety of Products for All EU Citizens (2006)
41. Commission, Your Rights as a Consumer: How the European Union Protects Your Interests (2007) 5-6.
42. S. Weatherill, 'The Evolution of European Consumer Law and Policy: From Well Informed Consumer to Confident Consumer?' in Rechtseinheit oder Rechtsvielfalt in Europa? Rolle und Funktion des Verbraucherrechts in der EG und den MOE-Staaten, ed. H.W. Micklitz ch. 25.1996
43. Commission, Communication on the EU Consumer Policy Strategy -2013 COM(2007) final 99, 22.2007
44. Commission, DG Health and Consumers Management Plan 2011 and Beyond (2010) 5.
45. M. Monti, A New Strategy for the Single Market: At the Service of Europe's Economy and Society (2010) 41.
46. Commission, Communication on Consumer Policy Action Plan 1999-2001 COM(98) 696 final, 1; for discussion, see M. Bevir and F. Trentmann, 'Civic Choices: Retrieving Perspectives on Rationality, Consumption, and Citizenship' in Citizenship and Consumption, eds. K. Soper and F. Trentmann (2007
47. Commission, Green Paper on European Union Consumer Protection COM 531 final, 3.2001
48. Commission, Communication on a Single Market for 21st Century Europe COM(2007) 724
49. Follow-up Communication to the Green Paper on EU Consumer Protection COM() 289 final, 3.2002
50. Council Directive 85/374/EEC concerning liability for defective products [] OJ L21/29.1985
51. Commission, Third Report on the Application of Council Directive on the Approximation of Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Concerning Liability for Defective Products COM 496 final, 4.2006
52. Council Directive 92/59/EEC on General Product Safety [] OJ L228/24.1992
53. SEA OJ 1992L1691.
54. Treaty establishing the European Community OJ C224/6, Article 100(a)(1).1992
55. Treaty on European Union [1992] OJ C191/1, Title XI, Article 129a, replaced by the Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Certain Related Acts [1997] OJ C340/173, Article 129a, now enshrined in Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union OJ C115/47, Title XV, Article 169.2008
56. Council Directive 76/768/EEC on Cosmetic Products OJ L262/169, Preamble.1976
57. Article 95 EC.
58. Case C-210/03, Swedish Match v. Secretary of State for Health ECR I-11893, para. 33.2004
59. S. Weatherill, 'The Limits of Legislative Harmonization Ten Years After Tobacco Advertising: How the Court's Case Law Has Become a "Drafting Guide"' (2011) 12 German Law J. 827-64.
60. Commission, Corrigendum: Proposal for a Regulation on Cosmetic Products (Recast) COM() 49 final/2, 4.2008
61. Low Voltage Directive 73/23/EEC OJ L77/29, Preamble.1973
62. Low Voltage Directive 2006/95/EC OJ L374/10, Preamble.2006
63. Toy Safety Directive 88/378/EEC OJ L187/13, Preamble.1988
64. Toy Safety Directive /48/EC [2009] OJ L170/1, Preamble.2009
65. Dangerous Substances Directive 67/548/EEC OJ L196/1, Preamble.1967
66. Directive 2001/95/EC on General Product Safety [] OJ L11/4.2002
67. This objective is repeated throughout the Treaty, see, for example, Articles 114(3), 168(1), 169(1) TFEU.
68. Commission, White Paper on Completing the Internal Market COM 310 final, 32.1985
69. EP Debate No. 18, 8 March 2011, MEP Edit Herczog.
70. Commission, Communication on Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An Action Plan for Europe 2005-2009 COM 243 final, 7.2005
71. Commission, Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology COM 338 final, 18.2004
72. Department for Trade and Industry, New Dimensions for Manufacturing - A UK Strategy for Nanotechnology (2002) 34.
73. M. Lee, EU Regulation of GMOs: Law and Decision Making for a New Technology (2009) ch. 3. For similar findings with regard to GMOs, see
74. Council for Science and Technology, Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: A Review of Government's Progress on its Policy Commitments (2007
75. European Economic and Social Committee, Opinion on the Communication from Commission on Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials OJ C218/21, para. 2.12.2009
76. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, Opinion on the Ethical Aspects of Nanomedicine, Opinion No. 21 (2007).
77. Lloyd's, Synthetic Biology: Influencing Development (2009) 4
78. where Lee discusses the narrowness of policy responses to GMOs which attach greater weight to scientific and technical information than to 'other legitimate factors' relevant to authorization decisions under Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003 on GM Food and Feed [2003] OJ L268/1, Article 7. The EP has also been critical of the almost exclusive focus on the scientific assessment of risks and the promotion of internal market over other socio-economic and environmental objectives, see EP, Resolution on the proposal for a Regulation as Regards the Possibility for the Member States to Restrict or Prohibit the Cultivation of GMOs in Their Territory, P7_TA(2011)0314.
79. The first of these to be introduced was the Food Additives Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 [2008] L354/16
80. Commission, Communication on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council at first reading on the adoption of a Regulation on the provision of food information to consumers COM(2011) 77 final, 5; EP, Resolution on Novel Foods, P7_TA-PROV 0266, Amendment 75 Article 9(2)(c). Note that conciliation talks between the EP and the Council failed, hence the Novel Foods Regulation (EC) No 258/97 remains in force.2010
81. EP, Report on the proposal for a regulation concerning the placing on the market and use of biocidal products, A7-0239/, Amendments 183 and 213.2010
82. EP, Report on the proposal for a Directive on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (Recast), A7-0196/, Amendment 15.2010
83. Council, 'Working Document from General Secretariat of Council/Presidency to the Working Party on Technical Harmonisation on the Proposal for a Regulation on Cosmetic Products (Recast)', 6972/09 LIMITE, 74.
84. For recent attempts to improve clarity, see Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR), 'Scientific Basis for the Definition of the Term "Nanomaterial"' (2010)
85. Recommendation on the definition of Nanomaterial' 2011
86. The increasing use of 'nano-free' labels is indicative of concerns that nanoingredients may cause anxiety among consumers, see Science and Technology Committee, Nanotechnologies and Food, HL (2009-10) 22-II, 139. Similar debates have been had in other domains too, notably the policy debate on genetic modification and the EU obligation to label all food and feed products consisting of or containing genetically modified organisms, Regulation (EC) No. 1830/2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms [2003] OJ L268/24, Regulation 6. For commentary, see B. Roe and M.F. Teisl, 'Genetically Modified Food Labelling: The Impacts of Message and Messenger on Consumer Perceptions of Labels and Products' (2007) 32 Food Policy 49-66.
87. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union OJ C115/47, Title XV, Article 1692008
88. EP, Resolution on the Commission Communication on 'Consumer Policy Strategy 2002-, P5_TA(2003) 0100, paras. 25-6 and 29.2006
89. E. Stokes, 'You Are What You Eat: Market Citizens and the Right to Know About Nano Foods' (2011) 2 J. of Human Rights and the Environment 178-200, at 190.
90. M. Micheletti, Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action (2003).
91. EP, Draft Legislative Resolution on the Proposal for a Regulation on Novel Foods, A6-0512/, Amendment 59.2008
92. Yet information provision can be anything but straightforward and benign. For insights into the complexities of transparency, see E. Fisher, 'Transparency and Administrative Law: A Critical Evaluation' 272-314201063Current Legal Problems
93. S. Jasanoff, 'Transparency in Public Science: Purposes, Reasons, Limits' (2006) 69 Law and Contemporary Problems 21-45.
94. Commission, Proposal for a Directive on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment COM(2008) 809 final, 7; Commission, Proposal for a Regulation on Novel Foods COM(2007) 872 final, 5, and Commission, Proposal for a Regulation on the Provision of Food Information to Consumers COM(2008) 40 final, 9; Commission, Proposal for a Regulation Concerning the Placing on the Market and Use of Biocidal Products COM 267 final, 10.2009
95. EP Debate No. 9 of 7 July , MEP Elisabetta Gardini.2010
96. MEP Sari Essayah.
97. R. Baldwin and J. Black, 'Really Responsive Regulation' (2008) 71 Modern Law Rev. 59-94.