Nanotechnology, contingency and finitude

NanoEthics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-16

  Groves, Christopher ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Finitude; Indeterminacy; Nanotechnology; Novelty; Risk; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 63649138823     PISSN: 18714757     EISSN: 18714765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11569-009-0057-z     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adam B (1998) Timescapes of modernity: The environment and invisible hazards. Routledge, London
2. Adam B, Groves C (2007) Future matters: Action, knowledge, ethics. Leiden, Brill
3. Aitken RJ, Chaudhry MQ et al (2006) Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: Current status in the UK and global trends. Occup Medicine-Oxford 56(5):300-306. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kql051
4. Allianz AG (2007) Small sizes that matter. Allianz AG, Munich
5. Amato I (1999) Nanotechnology: Shaping the world atom by atom. National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology, Washington DC
6. Andorno R (2004) The precautionary principle: A new legal standard for a technological age. J Int Biotechnol Law 1(1):11-19. doi: 10.1515/ jibl.2004.1.1.11
7. Anton P, Silberglitt R et al (2001) The global technology revolution: bio/nano/materials trends and their synergies with information technology by 2015. RAND, (Santa Monica, CA
8. Arnall A, Parr D (2004) Moving the nanoscience and technology (NST) debate forwards: Short-term impacts, long-term uncertainty and the social constAtution. In: Nanotechnologies: a preliminary risk analysis. European Commission. Retrieved 10/04/08 from http://europa.eu.int/comm/ health/ph_risk/events_risk_en.htm
9. Barry A (2001) Political machines: Governing a technological society. Athlone, London
10. Bauman Z (2005) Liquid life. Polity Press, Cambridge
11. Beck U (1992) Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage Publications, London
12. Beck U (1996) Wissen oder Nicht-Wissen? Zwei Pespektiven reflexiver Modernisierung. In: Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (eds) Reflexive Modernisierung. Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, pp 289-315
13. Beck U (2005) Power in the global age: A new global political economy. Polity, Cambridge
14. Bernstein P (1996) Against the Gods: The remarkable story of risk. Chichester, Wiley
15. Brown N, Michael M (2003) A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 15(1):3-18. doi: 10.1080/0953732032000046024
16. Calkins DR, Dixon RL et al (1980) Identification, characterization and control of potential human carcinogens: A framework for federal decision-making. J Natl Cancer Inst 64:169-176
17. Chhabra R, Sharma J et al (2006) Addressable molecular tweezers for DNA-templated coupling reactions. Nano Lett 6(5):978-983. doi: 10.1021/ nl060212f
18. Dannreuther C, Lekhi R (2000) Globalization and the political economy of risk. Rev Int Polit Econ 7(4):574-594. doi: 10.1080/096922900750034554
19. de S. Cameron NM (2006) Nanotechnology and the human future: Policy, ethics, and risk. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1093:280-300. doi: 10.1196/ annals.1382.019
20. Downey GL (1995) The world of industry-university-government: reimagining R&D as America. In: Marcus GE (ed) Technoscientific imaginaries: Conversations, profiles and memoirs. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 197-226
21. Drexler KE (2006) Nanotechnology: From Feynman to Funding. In: Hunt G, Mehta MD (eds) Nanotechnology: Risk, Ethics and Law. Earthscan, London, pp 25-34
22. Dupuy JP (2007) Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundations of nanoethics. J Med Philos 32(3):237-261. doi: 10.1080/03605310701396992
23. ETC Group (2003) The big down: From Genomes to Atoms
24. ETC Group (2005) Nanotech's "Second Nature" patents: implications for the Global South
25. Feenberg A (1999) Questioning technology. London, Routledge
26. Fischer F (2005) Are scientists irrational? Risk assessment in practical reason. In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement. Zed Books, London, pp 54-65
27. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1990) Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht
28. Gavelin K, Wilson R et al (2007) Democratic technologies? The final report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG). London, Involve
29. Gross M (2007) The unknown in process - dynamic connections of ignorance, non-knowledge and related concepts. Curr Sociol 55:742-759
30. Hacking I (1990) The taming of chance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
31. Hacking I (1986) Culpable ignorance of interference effects. In: MacLean D (ed) Values at risk. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa NJ, pp 136-154
32. Hansson SO (1996) Decision making under great uncertainty. Philos Soc Sci 26:369-386. doi: 10.1177/004839319602600304
33. Hansson SO (2000) Seven myths of risk. Stockholm thirty years on. Paper presented at Progress achieved and challenges ahead in international environmental co-operation, Swedish Ministry of the Environment, 17-18 June 2000
34. Hansson SO (2002) Uncertainties in the knowledge society. Int Soc Sci J 54(1):39. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00357
35. Hansson SO (2004) Weighing risks and benefits. Topoi-an Int Rev Philos 23:145-152
36. Hegel GWF (2004) Science of logic. Routledge, London
37. Herrick C, Jamieson D (1995) The social construction of acid rain. Glob Environ Change 5(2):105-112. doi: 10.1016/0959-3780(95) 00016-H
38. Horlick-Jones T (2000) Towards a non-reductionistic risk analysis. ESRC End of Award Report L211272006.
39. Hunt G (2006) The global ethics of nanotechnology. In: Hunt G, Mehta MD (eds) Nanotechnology: Risk, ethics and law. London, Earthscan, pp 183-195
40. International Centre for Technology Assessment (ICTA) (2008) Principles for the oversight of nanotechnologies and nanomaterials. Retrieved 13/03/ 08 from http://www.icta.org/doc/Principles%20for%20the%20Oversight% 20of%20Nanotechnologies%20and%20Nanomaterials_finalwJan08sigs.pdf
41. Jasanoff S (2005) Let them eat cake: GM foods and the democratic imagination. In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement. Zed Books, London, pp 183-198
42. Jones R (2004) Soft machines: Nanotechnology and life. Oxford University Press, Oxford
43. Kaiser M (1997) The precautionary principle and its implications for science. Found Sci 9:201-205. doi: 10.1023/A:1009641701933
44. Kass LR (ed) (2003) Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. President's Council on Bioethics, Washington DC
45. Kearnes M (2006) Chaos and control: Nanotechnology and the politics of emergence. Paragraph 29(2):57-80. doi: 10.3366/prg.2006.0014
46. Kearnes M, Grove-White R et al (2006) From bio to nano: Learning lessons from the UK agricultural biotechnology controversy. Sci Cult 15(4):291-307. doi: 10.1080/09505430601022619
47. Kearnes M, Macnaghten P et al (2006) Governing at the nanoscale: People, policies and emerging technologies. Demos, London
48. Kearnes M, Wynne B (2007) On nanotechnology and ambivalence: The politics of enthusiasm. Nanoethics 1:131-142. doi: 10.1007/ s11569-007-0014-7
49. Keulartz J, Schermer M et al (2004) Ethics in technological culture: A programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach. Sci Technol Human Values 29(3):3-29. doi: 10.1177/0162243903259188
50. Klamer A, Leonard TC (1994) So what's an economic metaphor? In: Mirowski P (ed) Natural images in economic thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 20-54
51. Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA
52. Lemley MA (2005) Patenting nanotechnology. Stanford Law Rev 58(2):601-630
53. Lopez J (2004) Bridging the gaps: Science fiction in nanotechnology. Hyle 10(2):129-152
54. Macoubrie J (2006) Nanotechnology: Public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Underst Sci 15:221-241. doi: 10.1177/ 0963662506056993
55. Marchant GE (2003) From general policy to legal rule: Aspirations and limitations of the precautionary principle. Environ Health Perspect 111(14):1799-1803
56. Marris P (1996) The politics of uncertainty: Attachment in private and public life. Routledge, London; New York
57. Meyer G, Folker AP et al (2005) The factualization of uncertainty: Risk, politics, and genetically modified crops - a case of rape. Agric Human Values 22(2):235-242. doi: 10.1007/s10460-004-8283-z
58. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) (2006) Environmental, health and safety research needs for engineered nanoscale materials. National Nanotechnology Coordination Office, Arlington, VA
59. Nelkin D (1975) The political impact of technical expertise. Soc Stud Sci 5:35-54. doi: 10.1177/030631277500500103
60. O'Neill J, Holland A et al (2008) Environmental values. Routledge, Abingdon
61. Peterson M (2007) On multi-attribute risk analysis. In: Lewens T (ed) Risk: Philosophical perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 68-83
62. Pidgeon N, Rodgers-Hayden T (2007) Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or 'upstream engagement'? Health Risk Soc 9(2):191-210. doi: 10.1080/13698570701306906
63. Plutowski U, Jester SS et al (2007) DNA-based self-Sorting of nanoparticles on gold surfaces. Adv Mater 19(15):1951-1956. doi: 10.1002/ adma.200602169
64. Powell MC (2007) New risk or old risk, high risk or no risk? How scientists' standpoints shape their nanotechnology risk frames. Health Risk Soc 9(2):173-190. doi: 10.1080/13698570701306872
65. Puchner EM, Kufer SK et al (2008) Nanoparticle self-assembly on a DNA-Scaffold written by single-molecule cut-and-paste. Nano Lett 8(11):3692-3695. doi: 10.1021/nl8018627
66. Ravetz JR (1993) The sin of science: Ignorance of ignorance. Knowledge: creation, diffusion. Utilization 15(12):157-165
67. Renn O, Roco MC (2006) Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. J Nanopart Res 8(2):153-191. doi: 10.1007/s11051-006-9092-7
68. Rip A (2006) The tension between fiction and precaution in nanotechnology. In: Fisher E, Jones J, von Schomberg R (eds) Implementing the precautionary principle: Perspectives and prospects. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 270-283
69. Roco MC (2004) Nanoscale science and engineering: Unifying and transforming tools. AIChE J 50(5):890-897. doi: 10.1002/aic.10087
70. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Springer
71. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2003) Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/London
72. Rose N (1999) The powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
73. Rose N (2001) The politics of life itself. Theory Cult Soc 18(1):1-30. doi: 10.1177/02632760122051607
74. Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 7:385-403. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
75. Schummer J (2001) Ethics of chemical synthesis. Hyle 7(2):103-124
76. Stirling A (2007) Risk, precaution and science: Towards a more constructive policy debate. EMBO Rep 8(4):309-315. doi: 10.1038/ sj.embor.7400953
77. Tallacchini M (2004) Before and beyond the precautionary principle: epistemology of uncertainty in science and the law. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 197(3):646-651
78. Throne-Holst H, Stø E (2008) Who should be precautionary? Governance of nanotechnology in the risk society. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 20(1):99-112. doi: 10.1080/09537320701726726
79. UK Government (2003) The future of air transport. London, Department for Transport
80. Uskokovic V (2007) Nanotechnologies: What we do not know. Technol Soc 29(1):43-61. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.005
81. Vaidhyanathan S (2006) Nanotechnologies and the law of patents: A collision course. In: Hunt G, MehRa MD (eds) Nanotechnology: risk, ethics and law. Earthscan, London, pp 225-236
82. Walker WE, Harremös P et al (2003) Defining uncertainty: A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assess 4(1):5-17. doi: 10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466
83. Webster A (2004) Risk, science and policy: Researching the social management of uncertainty. Policy Stud 25(1):5-15. doi: 10.1080/ 0144287042000208206
84. Wolff J (2006) Risk, fear, shame, blame and the regulation of public safety. Econ Philos 22(3):409-427. doi: 10.1017/S0266267106001040
85. Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning - reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environ Change 2(2):111-127
86. Wynne B (2002) Risk and environment as legitimatory discourses of technology: Reflexivity inside out? Curr Sociol 50(3):459-477. doi: 10.1177/0011392102050003010
87. Wynne B (2005) Risk as globalizing 'democratic' discourse? Framing subjects and citizens. In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement. Zed Books, London, pp 66-82
88. Žižek S (1989) Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel and the critique of ideology. Duke University Press, Durham