Methodological support for business process redesign in health care: A literature review protocol

International Journal of Care Pathways

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 119-126

  Vanwersch, R J B ^a   Shahzad, K ^b   Vanhaecht, K ^c,d   Grefen, P W P J ^a   Pintelon, L M ^c   Mendling, J ^e   van Merode, G G ^f   Reijers, H A ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d Center for Health Services and Nursing Research School of Public Health Leuven   (Norway)

^e VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

^f MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857341722     PISSN: 20404026     EISSN: 20404034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jicp.2011.011025     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Grover V. From business reengineering to business process change management: a longitudinal study of trends and practices. IEEE T Eng Manage 1999;46:36-46
2. Fink A. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 3rd edn. London: SAGE Publication, 2010
3. Rowley J, Slack F. Conducting a literature review. Manag Res News 2004;27:31-9
4. Torraco RJ. Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resource Dev Rev 2005;4:356-67
5. Kitchenham BA. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele: Keele University, Technical Report No. TR/SE-0401, 2004
6. Vos L, Van Oostenbrugge RJ, Limburg M, et al. How to implement process-oriented care: a case study on the implementation of process-oriented in-hospital stroke care. Accred Qual Assur 2009;14:5-13
7. Reijers HA, Mansar SL. Best practices in business process redesign: an overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics. Omega 2005;33:283-306
8. Jansen-Vullers MH, Kleingeld PAM, Netjes M. Quantifying the performance of workflows. IS Manag 2008;25:332-43
9. Netjes M. Process Improvement: The Creation and Evaluation of Process Alternatives. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University Press, 2010
10. Grunert KG, Ellegaard C. The concept of key success factors: theory and method. Aarhus: Aarhus University, MAPP working paper no. 4, 1992
11. DeNisi AS, Kluger AN. Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Acad Manage Rev 2000;14:129-39
12. Webster J, Watson RT. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quart 2002;26:13-23
13. Levy Y, Ellis TJ. A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Sci J 2006;9:181-212
14. Okoli C, Schabram K. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers Inform Sys 2010;10:1-49
15. Randolph JJ. A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Pract Assess Res Eval 2009;14:1-13
16. Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, et al. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Softw 2007;80:571-83
17. Adesola S, Baines T. Developing and evaluating a methodology for business process improvement. Business Process Manag J 2005;11:37-46
18. Grover V, Malhorta MK. Business process reengineering: a tutorial on the concept, evolution, method, technology and application. J Oper Manag 1997;15:193-213
19. Hammer M. Reengineering work: don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Bus Rev 1990;68:104-12
20. Davenport TH, Short J. The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign. SLOAN Manage Rev 1990;31:11-27
21. Grimshaw J, McAuley LM, Bero LA, et al. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:298-303
22. Walsh D, Downe S. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. J Adv Nurs 2005;50:204-11
23. Mistiaen P, Francke AL, Poot E. Interventions aimed at reducing problems in adult patients discharged from hospital to home: a systematic meta-review. BMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:47-67