Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Tóth, Géza ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE SENSITIVITIES; FISHER INFORMATION; HIGH-PRECISION; MAXIMUM SENSITIVITY; MULTIPARTITE ENTANGLEMENTS; PHASE ESTIMATION;

FISHER INFORMATION MATRIX; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

ELECTRON ENERGY ANALYZERS;

EID: 84857287842     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022322     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35000514 403, 515 (2000). (Pubitemid 30082190)
2. M. Bourennane, M. Eibl, C. Kurtsiefer, S. Gaertner, H. Weinfurter, O. Gühne, P. Hyllus, D. Bruß, M. Lewenstein, and A. Sanpera, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.087902 92, 087902 (2004).
3. N. Kiesel, C. Schmid, U. Weber, G. Tóth, O. Gühne, R. Ursin, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95. 210502 95, 210502 (2005). (Pubitemid 41777026)
4. N. Kiesel, C. Schmid, G. Tóth, E. Solano, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.063604 98, 063604 (2007). (Pubitemid 46226911)
5. W. Wieczorek, R. Krischek, N. Kiesel, P. Michelberger, G. Tóth, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103. 020504 103, 020504 (2009);
6. G. Tóth, W. Wieczorek, R. Krischek, N. Kiesel, P. Michelberger, and H. Weinfurter, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/11/8/083002 11, 083002 (2009).
7. R. Prevedel, G. Cronenberg, M. S. Tame, M. Paternostro, P. Walther, M. S. Kim, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 103.020503 103, 020503 (2009);
8. S. Campbell, M. S. Tame, and M. Paternostro, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/073039 11, 073039 (2009).
9. C. A. Sackett, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35005011 404, 256 (2000). (Pubitemid 30163535)
10. H. Häffner, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature04279 438, 643 (2005). (Pubitemid 41740570)
11. O. Mandel, M. Greiner, A. Widera, T. Rom, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature02008 425, 937 (2003). (Pubitemid 37376920)
12. A. Acín, D. Bruß, M. Lewenstein, and A. Sanpera, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.040401 87, 040401 (2001).
13. O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 474, 1 (2009).
14. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1104149 306, 1330 (2004). (Pubitemid 39534415)
15. A. S. Holevo, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspect of Quantum Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982).
16. C. W. Helstrom, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1976).
17. L. Pezzé and A. Smerzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.100401 102, 100401 (2009).
18. P. Hyllus, O. Gühne, and A. Smerzi, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.012337 82, 012337 (2010).
19. A. S. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4431 86, 4431 (2001). (Pubitemid 32471356)
20. For entanglement witnesses, see M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2 223, 1 (1996);
21. B. M. Terhal, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00401- 1 271, 319 (2000);
22. M. Lewenstein, B. Kraus, J.I. Cirac, and P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052310 62, 052310 (2000); (Pubitemid 32023274)
23. D. Bruß, J.I. Cirac, P. Horodecki, F. Hulpke, B. Kraus, M. Lewenstein, and A. Sanpera, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/ 09500340110105975 49, 1399 (2002);
24. for the detection of genuine multipartite entanglement, see M. Bourennane, M. Eibl, C. Kurtsiefer, S. Gaertner, H. Weinfurter, O. Gühne, P. Hyllus, D. Bruß, M. Lewenstein, and A. Sanpera, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.087902 92, 087902 (2004);
25. G. Tóth and O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.060501 94, 060501 (2005); (Pubitemid 40620758)
26. G. A. Durkin and C. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.180402 95, 180402 (2005). (Pubitemid 41777253)
27. It has also been worked out how to detect the genuine multipartite entanglement that can be obtained in a selected part of a very large quantum system through local operations around the boundary of that selected part. This makes it possible to study multipartite entanglement in the three-, four-, and five-particle blocks of a large quantum system and produce an entanglement map. See E. Alba, G. Tóth, and J. J. García-Ripoll, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.062321 82, 062321 (2010).
28. Recently, via semidefinite programming, it has become possible to find an entanglement witness detecting genuine multipartite entanglement for a given quantum state. See B. Jungnitsch, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.190502 106, 190502 (2011).
29. For device independent entanglement witnesses for multipartite entanglement, see J.-D. Bancal, N. Gisin, Y.-C. Liang, and S. Pironio, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.250404 106, 250404 (2011).
30. J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, NY) 1, 195 (1964).
31. N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65. 1838 65, 1838 (1990).
32. N. Gisin and H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00516-7 246, 1 (1998).
33. M. Seevinck and J. Uffink, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012107 65, 012107 (2001).
34. D. Collins, N. Gisin, S. Popescu, D. Roberts, and V. Scarani, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.170405 88, 170405 (2002).
35. K. Nagata, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.260401 89, 260401 (2002).
36. J. Uffink, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88. 230406 88, 230406 (2002).
37. J.I. de Vicente and M. Huber, Phys. Rev. A 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.84. 062306 84, 062306 (2011).
38. M. Seevinck and O. Gühne, New J. Phys. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/053002 12, 053002 (2010).
39. M. Huber, F. Mintert, A. Gabriel, and B. C. Hiesmayr, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.210501 104, 210501 (2010).
40. G. Tóth, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B JOBPDE 0740-3224 10.1364/JOSAB.24. 000275 24, 275 (2007). (Pubitemid 46421071)
41. G. Vitagliano, P. Hyllus, I. L. Egusquiza, and G. Tóth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.240502 107, 240502 (2011).
42. L.-M. Duan, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107. 180502 107, 180502 (2011).
43. Z. Chen, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052302 71, 052302 (2005). (Pubitemid 41481365)
44. D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, Am. J. Phys. AJPIAS 0002-9505 10.1119/1.16243 58, 1131 (1990).
45. O. Gühne, G. Tóth, and H. J. Briegel, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/229 7, 229 (2005). (Pubitemid 41568742)
46. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3439 72, 3439 (1994).
47. For the general theory of entanglement detection with uncertainty relations, see H. F. Hofmann and S. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.032103 68, 032103 (2003);
48. O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92. 117903 92, 117903 (2004).
49. G. Tóth, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052327 69, 052327 (2004).
50. G. Tóth, C. Knapp, O. Gühne, and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042334 79, 042334 (2009).
51. X. Yin, X. Wang, J. Ma, and X. Wang, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. JPAPEH 0953-4075 10.1088/0953-4075/44/1/015501 44, 015501 (2011).
52. The calculations have been made with qubit4matlab v3.0. See G. Tóth, Comput. Phys. Comm. CPHCBZ 0010-4655 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.03.007 179, 430 (2008).
53. G. Tóth and M. W. Mitchell, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/053007 12, 053007 (2010).
54. M. Wieniak, V. Vedral, and . Brukner, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/258 7, 258 (2005).
55. D. Petz (private communication).
56. D. Petz, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/35/4/ 305 35, 929 (2002). (Pubitemid 37026753)
57. S.-L. Luo, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91. 180403 91, 180403 (2003).
58. E. P. Wigner and M. M. Yanase, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.49.6.910 49, 910 (1963).
59. Zh. Ma, e-print arXiv: 0908.1291.
60. P. Hyllus, W. Laskowski, R. Krischek, C. Schwemmer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, L. Pezzé, and A. Smerzi, preceding paper, Phys. Rev. A 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022321 85, 022321 (2012);
61. see also R. Krischek, C. Schwemmer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, P. Hyllus, L. Pezzé, and A. Smerzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.080504 107, 080504 (2011).
62. O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92. 117903 92, 117903 (2004).
63. O. Gühne, P. Hyllus, O. Gittsovich, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.130504 99, 130504 (2007). (Pubitemid 47510859)
64. L.-M. Duan, G. Giedke, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2722 84, 2722 (2000).
65. R. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2726 84, 2726 (2000).
66. R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277 40, 4277 (1989).
67. G. Tóth, C. Knapp, O. Gühne, and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.250405 99, 250405 (2007). (Pubitemid 350281277)