Use of DNA barcodes to identify invasive armyworm Spodoptera species in Florida

Journal of Insect Science

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Nagoshi, Rodney N ^a   Brambila, Julieta ^b   Meagher, Robert L ^a  

^a CENTER FOR MEDICAL   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

COI; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I; Invasive pests; Mitochondrial DNA

Indexed keywords

HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; NOCTUIDAE; SPODOPTERA; SPODOPTERA LITTORALIS; SPODOPTERA LITURA;

ANIMAL; ARMYWORM; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA BARCODING; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GENETICS; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MALE; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FLORIDA; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MALE; SPODOPTERA;

EID: 84857279330     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15362442     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1673/031.011.15401     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Armstrong KF, Ball SL. 2005. DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 360: 1813-1823. (Pubitemid 44365042)
2. Ball SL, Armstrong KF. 2006. DNA barcodes for insect pest identification: A test case with tussock moths (Lepidoptera : Lymantriidae). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 337-350. (Pubitemid 43774128)
3. Behere GT, Russell D, Batterham P, Tay WT. 2007. Two species into one: Bottleneck history of Helicoverpa zea from Helicoverpa armigera revealed by DNA barcoding. Journal of Insect Science 7:29. Available online, http://insectscience.org/7.29
4. Darling J, Blum M. 2007. DNA-based methods for monitoring invasive species: a review and prospectus. Biological Invasions 9: 751-765. (Pubitemid 47414776)
5. Dasmahapatra KK, Elias M, Hill RI, Hoffman JI, Mallet J. 2010. Mitochondrial DNA barcoding detects some species that are real, and some that are not. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 264-273.
6. Elias M, Hill RI, Willmott KR, Dasmahapatra KK, Brower AVZ, Mallet J, Jiggins CD. 2007. Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B-Biological Sciences 274: 2881-2889. (Pubitemid 350057943)
7. Ellis, S. E. 2004. New Pest Response Guidelines: Noctuidae: Spodoptera. USDA APHIS PPQ PDMP. Available online, http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/manuals/
8. Floyd R, Lima J, deWaard J, Humble L, Hanner R. 2010. Common goals: policy implications of DNA barcoding as a protocol for identification of arthropod pests. Biological Invasions 12: 2947-2954.
9. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B-Biological Sciences 270: 313-321. (Pubitemid 36228536)
10. Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biology 2(10): e312. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio. 0020312 (Pubitemid 39532927)
11. Heppner JB. 1998. Spodoptera armyworms in Florida (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomology Circular 390: 1-5.
12. Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Blandin P, Burns JM, Cadiou JM, Chacon I, Dapkey T, Deans AR, Epstein ME, Espinoza B, Franclemont JG, Haber WA, Hajibabaei M, Hall JPW, Hebert PDN, Gauld ID, Harvey DJ, Hausmann A, Kitching IJ, Lafontaine D, Landry JF, Lemaire C, Miller JY, Miller JS, Miller L, Miller SE, Montero J, Munroe E, Green SR, Ratnasingham S, Rawlins JE, Robbins RK, Rodriguez JJ, Rougerie R, Sharkey MJ, Smith MA, Solis MA, Sullivan JB, Thiaucourt P, Wahl DB, Weller SJ, Whitfield JB, Willmott KR, Wood DM, Woodley NE, Wilson JJ. 2009. Integration of DNA barcoding into an ongoing inventory of complex tropical biodiversity. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 1-26.
13. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120. (Pubitemid 11166431)
14. Librado P, Rozas J. 2009. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451-1452.
15. Lou M, Golding GB. 2010. Assigning sequences to species in the absence of large interspecific differences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56: 187-194.
16. Luginbill P. 1928. The fall armyworm. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 34: 1-91.
17. Meagher RL, Brambila J, Hung E. 2008. Monitoring for Exotic Spodoptera Species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Florida. Florida Entomologist 91: 517-522.
18. Mochida O. 1973. Two important insect pests, Spodoptera litura (F.) and S. littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae), on various crops-Morphological discrimination of the adult, pupal, and larval stages. Applied Entomology and Zoology 8: 205-214.
19. Nagoshi RN, Silvie P, Meagher Jr RL. 2007. Comparison of haplotype frequencies differentiate fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) corn-strain populations from Florida and Brazil. Journal of Economic Entomology 100: 954-961. (Pubitemid 46960198)
20. Nagoshi RN, Meagher RL, Adamczyk JJ, Braman SK, Brandenburg RL, Nuessly G. 2006. New restriction fragment length polymorphisms in the cytochrome oxidase I gene facilitate host strain identification of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae) populations in the southeastern United States. Journal of Economic Entomology 99: 671-677. (Pubitemid 44638053)
21. Nemoto H, Takahashi K, Kubota A. 1980. Reduction of the population-density of Spodoptera litura (F) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) using a synthetic sex-pheromone. 1. Experiment in taro field. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 24: 211-216.
22. Neumark S, Waters RM, Jacobson M, Teich I. 1977. Relative attractiveness of several synthetic formulations of Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera- Noctuidae) pheromone to male moths. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A-Environmental Science and Engineering and Toxic and Hazardous Substance Control 12: 259-276. (Pubitemid 8141825)
23. Pogue MG. 2002. A world revision of the genus Spodoptera Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Memoirs of the American Entomological Society 43: 1-202.
24. Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K. 2006. A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for "barcoding" identification. Journal of Heredity 97: 581-594. (Pubitemid 46033025)
25. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The Neighbor-Joining method - a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406-425.
26. Silva-Brandao KL, Lyra ML, Freitas AVL. 2009. Barcoding Lepidoptera: Current situation and perspectives on the usefulness of a contentious technique. Neotropical Entomology 38: 441-451.
27. USDA-APHIS-PPQ. 2010. Agriculture Quarantine Activity System Pest ID database.
28. USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2008. Floriculture: Top 5 States by Value of Sales, US. Available online, http://www.nass.usda.gov/Charts- and-Maps/Floriculture-Crops/USDA-NASS
29. Virgilio M, Backeljau T, Nevado B, De Meyer M. 2010. Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders. Bmc Bioinformatics 11:206. Available online, http://biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/206
30. Wiemers M, Fiedler K. 2007. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? - a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Frontiers in Zoology 4: 8.