Simplified postoperative nausea and vomiting impact scale for audit and post-discharge review

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 423-429

  Myles, P S ^a,b   Wengritzky, R ^a  

^a ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

ambulatory surgery; anaesthesia; patient rating; patient reported outcomes; postoperative nausea; vomiting

Indexed keywords

ANTIEMETIC AGENT;

ADULT; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONVALESCENCE; DATA ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84857274705     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer505     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gan TJ, Meyer TA, Apfel CC, et al. Society for ambulatory anesthesia guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1615-28 (Pubitemid 350190555)
2. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, et al. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 83-90 (Pubitemid 29025152)
3. Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 652-8 (Pubitemid 29409815)
4. Gupta A, Wu CL, Elkassabany N, Krug CE, Parker SD, Fleisher LA. Does the routine prophylactic use of antiemetics affect the incidence of postdischarge nausea and vomiting following ambulatory surgery?: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 488-95 (Pubitemid 36909577)
5. Revicki DA, Cella D, Hays RD, Sloan JA, Lenderking WR, Aaronson NK. Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 70
6. Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY, Wang YH, et al. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 486-92
7. Cepeda M. What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain 2003; 105: 151-7 (Pubitemid 37162484)
8. Myles PS, Christelis N. Measuring pain and analgesic response. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 399-400
9. Moore A, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics. Pain 1996; 66: 229-37 (Pubitemid 26283992)
10. Revicki DA, Gnanasakthy A, Weinfurt K. Documenting the rationale and psychometric characteristics of patient reported outcomes for labeling and promotional claims: the PRO Evidence Dossier. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 717-23 (Pubitemid 46474951)
11. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Guidance for Industry on Patient-reported Outcome Measures Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Food and Drug Administration Federal Register, 2009; 1-30
12. Wengritzky R, Mettho T, Myles PS, Burke J, Kakos A. Development and validation of a postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity scale. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 158-66
13. Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 693-700 (Pubitemid 29418651)
14. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, Solly R, Woodward D, Kelly S. Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 862-7 (Pubitemid 32939108)
15. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 11-5 (Pubitemid 30009299)
16. Somers R. A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables.. Am Sociological Rev 1962; 27: 799-811
17. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27: S178-89