Measuring pain and analgesic response

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 399-400

  Myles, Paul S ^a,b   Christelis, Nicholas ^a  

^a ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; FENTANYL; MORPHINE; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; OPIATE;

11 POINT NUMERICAL RATING SCALE; ANALGESIA; ANXIETY; BLEEDING; CONSTIPATION; COPING BEHAVIOR; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEAR; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; KIDNEY INJURY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MOOD; NOCICEPTION; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PEPTIC ULCER; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGNOSIS; RATING SCALE; RESPIRATION DEPRESSION; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RISK REDUCTION; SEDATION; SELF REPORT; SIDE EFFECT; SLEEP DISORDER; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ANALGESICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;

EID: 79959715856     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834592a8     Document Type: Note

References (25)

1. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes, definitions of pain terms. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASPPress; 1994.
2. Bonica JJ. The need of a taxonomy. Pain 2006; 6:247-252.
3. Anand KJS, Craid KDN. New perspectives on the definition of pain. Pain 1996; 67:3-6. (Pubitemid 26319630)
4. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 1986; 27:117-126. (Pubitemid 16003213)
5. Scott DA, McDonald WM. Assessment, measurement and history. In: Macintyre PE, Rowbotham D, Walker S, editors. Textbook of clinical pain management: acute pain. 2nd ed. London: Hodder Education; 2008; 99-101.
6. Macintyre PE, Schug SA, Scott DA, Visser EJ, Walker SM. APM:SE Working Group of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Faculty of Pain Medicine. Acute Pain Management: Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Melbourne: ANZCA & FPM; 2010; 36-40.
7. Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MIJ. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976; 31:1191-1198.
8. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, et al. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1978; 37:378-381. (Pubitemid 9017965)
9. Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 1994; 56:217-226. (Pubitemid 24067851)
10. DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stiff JL. The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:102-106. (Pubitemid 28040099)
11. Campbell WI, Patterson CC. Quantifying meaningful changes in pain. Anaesthesia 1998; 53:121-125. (Pubitemid 28052355)
12. Myles PS, Troedel S, Boquest M, Reeves M. The pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear? Anesth Analg 1999; 89:1517-1520.
13. Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, et al. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology 2001; 95:1356-1361. (Pubitemid 33126746)
14. Cepada MS, Africano JM, Polo R, et al. What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain 2003; 105:151-157. (Pubitemid 37162484)
15. Aubrun F, Langeron O, Quesnel C, et al. Relationships between measurement of pain using visual analog score and morphine requirements during postoperative intravenous morphine titration. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:1415-1421. (Pubitemid 36622475)
16. Moore A, Moore O, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: use of pain intensity and visual analogue scales. Pain 1997; 69:311-315. (Pubitemid 27096413)
17. Plummer JL, Owen H, Ilsley AH, Tordoff K. Sustained-release ibuprofen as an adjunct to morphine patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:92-96. (Pubitemid 26225380)
18. Moore RA, Mhuircheartaigh RJN, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Mean analgesic consumption is inappropriate for testing analgesic efficacy in postoperative pain: analysis and alternative suggestion. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:427-432.
19. Tramer MR, Walder B. Number needed to treat (or harm). World J Surg 2005; 29:576-578.
20. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Note for guidance on clinical investigation of medicinal products for treatment of nociceptive pain. London: The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicine Products; 2002.
21. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, et al. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:11-15. (Pubitemid 30009299)
22. Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung F. A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2007; 105:63-69. (Pubitemid 46975849)
23. Kluivers KB, Riphagen I, Vierhout ME, et al. Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery 2008; 143:206-215.
24. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005; 113:9-19. (Pubitemid 40038441)
25. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, McDermottMP, et al. Analyzing multiple endpoints in clinical trials of pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2008; 139:485-493.