Searching for answers: Networks of practice among public administrators

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 202-225

  Binz Scharf, Maria Christina ^a   Lazer, David ^b   Mergel, Ines ^c  

^a CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

case study; cross jurisdictional knowledge sharing; diffusion; innovation; network of practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857224147     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074011398956     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Agranoff, R. (1996). Managing intergovernmental processes. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 131-147). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Agranoff R.Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers.Public Administration Review. 2006;66:56-65.
3. Agranoff R.,McGuire M.Big questions in public network management research.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2001;11:295-326.
4. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10). Greenwich, CT: J.A.I. Press.
5. Anand V.,Glick W. H.,Manz C. C.Thriving on the knowledge of outsiders: Tapping organizational social capital.Academy of Management Executive. 2002;16 (1): 87-101.
6. Ansell C.,Gash A.Collaborative governance in theory and practice.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;18:543-571.
7. Bardach E.Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings; 1999:.
8. Bardach E.Developmental dynamics: Interagency collaboration as an emergent phenomenon.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2001;11:149.
9. Bieber, F. R. (2004). Science and technology of forensic DNA profiling: current use and future directions. In D. M. Lazer (Ed.), The technology of justice: DNA and the criminal justice system (pp. 23-62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Binz-Scharf M. C.Exploration and exploitation: Toward a theory of knowledge sharing in digital government projects. Saarbruecken, Germany: SVH Verlag; 2008:.
11. Blau P. M.The dynamics of bureaucracy. 1963). The dynamics of bureaucracy (2nd rev. ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1963:.
12. Brown J. S.,Duguid P.Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation.Organization Science. 1991;2 (1): 40-57.
13. Brown J. S.,Duguid P.Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective.Organization Science. 2001;12:198-213.
14. Burt R. S.Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1992:.
15. ButlerJ. (2005). NIST research update. 11th CODIS conference. Crystal City, VA. Retrieved from http://www.cstl.nist.gov/strbase/pub_pres/Butler_CODIS2005.pdf.
16. Coleman J. S.Social capital in the creation of human capital.American Journal of Sociology. 1988;94:S95-S120.
17. Coleman J. S.,Fararo T. J.Rational choice theory: Advocacy and critique. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1992:.
18. Constant D.,Sproull L.,Kiesler S.The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice.Organization Science. 1996;7:119-135.
19. Cross R.,Parker A.,Prusak A.,Borgatti S. P.Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks.Organizational Dynamics. 2001;30:100-120.
20. Cummings J. N.Works groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization.Management Science. 2004;50:352-364.
21. DiMaggio P. J.,Powell W. W.The iron cage revisited - institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review. 1983;48:147-160.
22. Duguid P."The art of knowing": Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice.Information Society. 2005;21:109-118.
23. Eglene O.,Dawes S. S.,Schneider C. A.Authority and leadership patterns in public sector knowledge networks.American Review of Public Administration. 2007;37:91-113.
24. Elster J.Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies.University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. 1999;2:345-421.
25. Emerson R. M.,Fretz R. I.,Shaw L. L.Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicage Press; 1995:.
26. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2001). Participant observation and fieldnotes. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27. Feld S. L.The focused organization of social ties.American Journal of Sociology. 1981;86:1015-1035.
28. Fountain J. E.Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings; 2001:.
29. Girard, M., & Stark, D. (2007). Socio-technologies of assembly: Sense making and demonstration in rebuilding Lower Manhattan. In V. Mayer-Schönberger & D. M. Lazer (Eds.), Governance and information technology: From electronic government to information government (pp. 145-176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Gouldner A. W.The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement.American Sociological Review. 1960;25:161-178.
31. Granovetter M. S.Strength of weak ties.American Journal of Sociology. 1973;78:1360-1380.
32. Grant R. M.Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.Strategic Management Journal. 1996;17:109-122.
33. Gray P. H.,Meister D. B.Knowledge sourcing effectiveness.Management Science. 2004;50:821-834.
34. Hansen M. T.The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1999;44 (1): 82-111.
35. Hansen M. T.Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies.Organization Science. 2002;13:232-248.
36. Hargadon A. B.,Bechky B. A.When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work.Organization Science. 2006;17:484-500.
37. Hinds P. J.,Bailey D. E.Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams.Organization Science. 2003;14:615-632.
38. Ibarra H.,Andrews S. B.Power, social influence, and sense making-Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1993;38:277-303.
39. Isett K.,Mergel I.,LeRoux K.,Mischen P.,Rethemeyer K.Networks in public administration scholarship: Understanding where we are and where we need to go.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2011;21:i157-i173.
40. Kaplan A.The conduct of inquiry. Scranton, PA: Chandler; 1964:.
41. Kiesler S.,Sproull L. S.Group decision-making and communication technology.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1992;52:96-123.
42. Knoke D.,Burt R. S.Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE; 1983:.
43. Krackhardt D.,Hanson J. R.Informal networks: The company behind the chart.Harvard Business Review. 1993;71:104-111.
44. Krackhardt D.,Kilduff M.Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;76:770-782.
45. Krackhardt D.,Stern R.Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation.Social Psychology Quarterly. 1988;51:123-140.
46. Lave J.,Wenger E.Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1991:.
47. Lee F.When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1997;72:336-363.
48. Lindenberg S.An assessment for the new political economy: Its potential for the social sciences and sociology in particular.Sociological Theory. 1985;3:99-114.
49. Lindenberg S.Homo socio-economicus: The emergence of a general model of man in the social sciences.Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 1990;146:727-748.
50. Mandell, M. P. (2001). The impact of network structures on community-building efforts: The Los Angeles roundtable for children community studies. In M. P. Mandell (Ed.), Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management (pp. 129-153). Westport, CT: Quorum.
51. McGuire M.Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it.Public Administration Review. 2002;62:599-609.
52. Meier K. J.,O'Toole L. J.Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: A model with evidence from US public education.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2001;11:271-293.
53. Mergel I. A.,Lazer D. M.,Binz-Scharf M. C.Lending a helping hand: Voluntary engagement in a network of professionals.International Journal of Learning and Change. 2008;3 (1): 5-22.
54. Merton R. K.Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1957:.
55. Miles M. B.,Huberman A. M.Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1994:.
56. Milward H. B.,Provan K. G.Governing the hollow state.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2000;10:359-379.
57. Nebus J.Building collegial information networks: A theory of advice network generation.Academy of Management Review. 2006;31:615-637.
58. Nelson M. W.,Bloomfield R. J.,Hales J. W.,Libby R.The effect of information strength and weight on behavior in financial markets.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2001;86:168-196.
59. Nonaka I.A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.Organization Science. 1994;5 (1): 14-37.
60. NVivo. (2006). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 7th). Melbourne, Australia: QSR International.
61. The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century. O'Leary R.Bingham L. B., ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2009:.
62. O'Toole L. J.Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration.Public Administration Review. 1997;57 (1): 45-52.
63. O'Toole L. J.,Meier K. J.Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2004;14:469-494.
64. Orlikowski W. J.Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing.Organization Science. 2002;13:249-273.
65. Podolny J. M.,Page K. L.Network forms of organization.Annual Review of Sociology. 1998;24:57-76.
66. Polanyi M.Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks; 1962:.
67. Polanyi M.The tacit dimension. London, UK: Routledge; 1966:.
68. Powell W. W.,Koput K. W.,Smith-Doerr L.Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1996;41:116-145.
69. Provan K. G.,Huang K.,Milward H. B.The evolution of structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed health and human services network.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2009;19:873-893.
70. Provan K. G.,Isett K.,Milward H. B.Cooperation and compromise: A network response to conflicting institutional pressures in community mental health.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2004;33:489-514.
71. Provan K. G.,Kenis P.Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;18:229-252.
72. Rittel H. W. J.,Webber M.Dilemmas in a general theory of planning.Policy Sciences. 1973;4:155-169.
73. Rogers E. M.Diffusion of innovations. 1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.New York, NY: The Free Press; 1995:.
74. Schofield J.The old ways are the best? The durability and usefulness of bureaucracy in public sector management.Organization. 2001;8 (1): 77-96.
75. Schreiber, C., & Carley, K. M. (2003). The impact of databases on knowledge transfer: Simulation providing theory. Paper presented at the NAACSOS Conference 2003, Pittsburgh, PA.
76. Smith, C. P., Feld, S. C., & Franz, C. E. (1992). Methodological considerations: Steps in research employing content analysis systems. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 515-536). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
77. Soss J.,Schram S. F.,Vartanian T. P.,O'Brien E.Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution.American Journal of Political Science. 2001;45:378-395.
78. Spender J. C.Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm.Strategic Management Journal. 1996;17:45-62.
79. Spender J. C.,Grant R. M.Knowledge and the firm: Overview.Strategic Management Journal. 1996;17:5-9.
80. Sproull L.,Kiesler S.Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication.Management Science. 1986;32:1492-1512.
81. Strauss A. L.Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1987:.
82. Suddaby R.From the editors: What grounded theory is not.Academy of Management Journal. 2006;49:633-642.
83. Tichy N.,Fombrun C.Network analysis in organizational settings.Human Relations. 1979;32:923-965.
84. Uzzi B.Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1997;42 (1): 35-67.
85. Vaast E.,Walsham G.Trans-situated learning: Supporting a network of practice with an information infrastructure.Information Systems Research. 2009;20:547-564.
86. Volden C.States as policy laboratories: Emulating success in the children's health insurance program.American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50:294-312.
87. Walker J. L.The diffusion of innovations among the American states.The American Political Science Review. 1969;63:880-899.
88. Weber E. P.,Khademian A. M.Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings.Public Administration Review. 2008;68:334-349.
89. Weber M.Economy and society. New York, NY: Bedminster Press; 1968:.
90. Wenger E.Communities of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
91. West M. A.Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups.Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2002;51:355-387.
92. Willing R."CSI effect" has juries wanting more evidence.USA Today. 2004;:.
93. Wilson J. Q.Bureaucracy. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1991:.
94. Woodman R. W.,Sawyer J. E.,Griffin R. W.Toward a theory of organizational creativity.Academy of Management Review. 1993;18:293-321.
95. Yin R. K.Case study research: Design and methods. 1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1994:.